|
Suspect arrested for killing girlfriend whose body was found in Kern River Murdered woman found in Kern River identified 1-year-old girl possibly drowns Police conducting checkpoint Friday Riot at Lerdo Jail 'Something was wrong with his bike' Man blames ex-wife for 11 felonies, ex-wife calls him "wacko" Man stabbed by Bakersfield woman Attempted robbery at Chester Lane 7-Eleven Santa Ana inmate missing from Taft minimum security correctional camp February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 |
|
|
Bath tub drowning ruled accident
DROWNING DEATH 21 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
WESLEYSMOMMY
on Jul 15, 2008 at 05:11 PM
posted by
vanityfair
on Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22 PM
posted by
NEOCONGUY
on Jul 15, 2008 at 05:28 PM
Did we really need all the coverage! Shame on the local media!!!!! and my prayers go out to the family posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jul 15, 2008 at 06:14 PM
Well, there goes my drug theory. Why was this severely handicapped girl left alone in a bathtub? Neo, this is a Bakersfield newspaper; it's not like it's L.A. or S.F. or San Diego where real news happens. They gotta report on what they can... posted by
michele1075
on Jul 15, 2008 at 06:18 PM
posted by
meandpete
on Jul 15, 2008 at 07:05 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Jul 15, 2008 at 07:16 PM
It's a bad day all around. With all due respect JBS~ "cerebral palsy as a significant condition contributing to the death but not related to the cause of death." From the picture you can not tell how "severe" her condition was. Kelsey died at the same age. posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jul 15, 2008 at 08:03 PM
I wasn't talking about how severe her cerebral palsy was; cerbral palsy per se is a serious disability. Drowning caused her death; cerebral palsy was the cause of said drowning, thus the use of the term, "significant." posted by
sagefever
on Jul 15, 2008 at 08:10 PM
JBS~ *thumps your arm,really really hard*...Folks with CP range from smart minds trapped in totally useless bodies,to nearly "normal"...but I am sure you know more about this "condition" than I do....not.*thumps you again for good measure* not in the mood for silly arguments,sorry. posted by
Pup
on Jul 15, 2008 at 08:24 PM
posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jul 15, 2008 at 08:28 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Jul 15, 2008 at 09:03 PM
"An autopsy done Tuesday determined Angela Horton’s death was from accidental drowning. The coroner’s office determined Horton’s cerebral palsy contributed to her death but did not cause her to drown. Horton’s cerebral palsy qualified her for Kern Regional Center’s services. The center helps residents with developmental disabilities. “(Angela) was a sweet, genuine girl,” Madigan said. Horton attended Liberty High School and was well loved by everyone there, special education teacher Elizabeth Landeros said as she fought back tears. Horton loved music and dancing and she smiled all the time. “She was just always very cheerful,” Landeros said. “I never saw her get upset about anything.” It seemed like Horton always had the same, happy demeanor day after day, said former Liberty mathematics teacher John Goetjen. “I never saw her disappointed,” Goetjen said." From this story posted by
vanityfair
on Jul 15, 2008 at 10:25 PM
TBC ... why did you publish her name on your original "Breaking News"? She is a minor. And, it seems, a developmentally disabled minor at that. You won't reveal names of minors in cases of sexual molestation, but it was okay for you to broadcast the name and address of this family. edited for spelling posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jul 15, 2008 at 10:42 PM
Because revealing the name of a minor who is still living under those circumstances is done to protect said minor. In this particular case, the minor was dead, and therefore can suffer no adverse effects from having her name printed, just like the 12-year-old in Vermont who was kidnapped as a sex slave and then murdered. posted by
JustAThought
on Jul 15, 2008 at 10:45 PM
The biggest question here is why was the child left alone in the bathtub? Something about this situation is not right. posted by
vanityfair
on Jul 15, 2008 at 10:52 PM
I see your point, JBS, but the "adverse effects" can be felt by the family. The reports were irresponsible. When did you become TBC cheerleader?
posted by
sagefever
on Jul 15, 2008 at 10:56 PM
Just an observation,as my son was severely affected with CP, I am aware that the children who attend Liberty High School are considered "high functioning".The article says she could dance,she had a math teacher. Young people like my son,who only danced in his chair with wheels if I danced with him,who could not hold a pencil,let alone have a math teacher, attend E.B. If you must speculate,perhaps it would be wise to await further details.
posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jul 15, 2008 at 11:08 PM
I'm not a TBC cheerleader; I was a journalism major at Fresno State, and I understand that although it may be painful, the news must still be reported. A story like this has a time limit on it; wait too long and it's no longer news. I don't see it as being irresponsible; on the contrary, I see it as being completely responsible, as long as the girl's parents were notified of her death prior to the publication of the story. Life is shorter for some than others, and newspaper editors can't let their emotions get in the way of allowing them to do their jobs. Cynicism is invaluable when it comes to reporting this type of news, just as having the ability to take a punch is a invaluable to a fighter. posted by
vanityfair
on Jul 15, 2008 at 11:20 PM
But was it news? When did it become news? How does the accident of a special needs child affect anyone except her family? Again, I still don't see why it was okay to publish her name. Well, like you said before, there isn't any "real" news here like LA, SF, etc.
posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jul 15, 2008 at 11:34 PM
You hit the nail on the head. Bako has to take what it can get as far as local news. If a 17-year-old lost control of her car in the rain and had a fatal accident, her name would be published, even if the only people affected would be her family. It's not exactly what would be considered riveting news, but it is news, and this is a Bakersfield newspaper. posted by
vanityfair
on Jul 15, 2008 at 11:46 PM
Fair enough and that makes sense. It was the uncertainty and speculation in this case that I think was inappropriate. It wasn't a report of a fatal accident publishing the name of a minor, it was the dragging out of the story via "raw reports/breaking news" over a period of time that bothers me. Also, if a minor lost control of her car and had a fatal accident, her home address is never published. I think there is a certain sensitivity lacking here.
1
Our readers recommend: |