A blog about News.
About BreakingNewsTeam


Member Since:
February 13, 2008
Last Signed In:
November 22, 2009
Profile Views:
19962
Blog Views:
1939421
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Fleeing biker crashes in Lake Isabella
Saturday's Eureka Street victim ID'd; info sought
Kernville man detained for alleged bomb threat
Police release photos of suspects in credit card theft
Maricopa police bust one for meth sales
House fire put out in east Bakersfield
Arrest log for November 19
Police bust members of new gang, blame them for 50+ burglaries
Police looking for man who groped girl
Boxes stacked on stove sets apartment building on fire
Archives
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09

 

Who are we?


Steve E. Swenson

Phone: 661-395-7367

sswenson@bakersfield.com

 

Davin McHenry

Phone: 661-395-7374

dmchenry@bakersfield.com

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


BreakingNewsTeam - > Breaking News -> Acquitted! Of murder! In Kern County!
Acquitted! Of murder! In Kern County!

 Elizabeth Conley finally uttered three words she had been waiting to say for the past 26 months -- “He’s coming home.”

 

Conley stood outside a courtroom Tuesday wiping tears from her face and talking to family members on her cell phone. Her son, John Henry Bryant, was found not guilty for the 2006 shooting death of Meko Seward at Rockin’ Rodeo. The nightclub was located on Rosedale Highway and has since closed because of the shooting and other incidents, according to a previous Californian report.

 

Bryant and Anthony Lee Taylor were found guilty in 2007 for Seward’s death, but a judge granted Bryant a retrial when he determined Deputy District Attorney Ken Russell breached the defendant’s constitutional rights during closing arguments. Russell had told jurors Bryant did not speak to police about the shooting when in fact he spoke with investigators twice in the 14 months after his first statement. 

 

Taylor’s verdict remained guilty and he was sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole.

 

This doesn't happen a lot in Kern County. What do y'all think?

 

(Here's the full story.)

 

--Chris George

Assistant Team Leader

Breaking News Team

Posted in the News interest group.
Topics: John Henry Bryant, Elizabeth Conley, Anthony Lee Taylor, Rockin' Rodeo, shooting, death
posted by BreakingNewsTeam on Tuesday, August 12, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 363 times
8 comments from 7 users

1

posted by ArnieTSP on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:26 PM

Good job Bakersfield! Another murderer roaming the street due to a mistrial!! Maybe he can take our tax dollars for a bad arrest like Bruce Sons......by the by, Your title, "Aquited! Of Murder! In Kern County!" is pretty insulting. It insinuates that this isn't something that is the norm; unfortunately. Does anyone really think (if they followed this case) that he didn't do it?

posted by timec on Aug 13, 2008 at 07:17 AM

I feel he is innocent......He said he was innocent from the very beginning. You can see Mr. Taylor on the video actually shooting at the crowd. Everyone that is arrested is not guilty. Kern County has a problem with believing that. If Kern County DA's would start abiding by the law we wouldn't continue to have this problem. This just tells me that Vincent Brothers is next to walk. John aka Scooter was paralyzed years ago...he would have been pretty stupid to shoot someone from a wheelchair.

Kern Justice is Crooked Justice....

posted by melro on Aug 13, 2008 at 09:59 AM

I trust the jury.  After all, it was those people who heard the evidence.  I'm more concerned about the misconduct that seems to be pretty much of a regular thing from this DA's office.  Somebody over there needs to clean up their act!

posted by NancyII on Aug 13, 2008 at 10:03 AM

Melro, would that we were all so honest.  Most of us base our opinion on guilt or innocence on feelings.  Or what we read in the paper.  Or what other people say.  We have no real clue what evidence they have that they don't share with the public nor do we know what's said in the jury room.

I'm like most everyone else, I form my opinion and that's it.  Tha'ts why I know I would make a terrible juror.

 

posted by dawnimz on Aug 13, 2008 at 03:42 PM

The most accurate comment on this blog so far is comment #2. If the DA's office would not breach constitutional rights, would conduct more thorough investigations as soon as the crime is committed and if they would actually provide concrete evidence & credible witnesses, maybe there would be a higher probability of justice and closure. You cannot however sit back as a mere reader of the newspaper and claim this man is guilty of murder. The video that is plastered all over the media is of Anthony Taylor shooting. Anthony Taylor has been charged and is in prison. The video shows nothing proving John Henry Bryant is a murderer. Like #2 said, everyone that is arrested is not guilty. This man may have been involved with the wrong crowd, but that isn't enough to charge him with murder.
This is the justice system. For a full panel of qualified citizens to base conviction on evidence & proof, not outside opinion. Thank God! Imagine if everyone was tried & convicted based on uneducated public opinion? It'd be an even messier world than it already is.
It is far more important and our civic duty to get the facts before crucifying someone for something they may not have done.

posted by soltini on Aug 13, 2008 at 04:02 PM

Got rope ...will travel


posted by Dodgerfan08 on Aug 13, 2008 at 05:31 PM

The evidence against him was strong, but circumstantial.  On the other hand, the "misconduct" by the DA's office was ridiculous.  He said something he shouldn't have, there were objections, and he very clearly corrected himself.  He didn't mean to say it, and it didn't affect the jury in any way.  The DA isn't the bad guy here.  Also, the original trial was quite a bit longer than one day, and so if some of the original witnesses weren't called, it is completely understandable that he was found not guilty. 

posted by dawnimz on Aug 14, 2008 at 10:00 AM

This trial was not 1 day either. It was 4!
Of course the DA isn't the bad guy, but he doesn't help his cause by not producing enough stable evidence for 12 people to convict someone of murder.  His one comment that he shouldn't have made in the first trial, wasn't his only mistake.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement