|
Brothers' attorneys face contempt hearing Judge: Brothers deserves to die Jury recommends Brothers should receive the death penalty VERDICT IN DEATH PENALTY No Verdict This Week Jury begins deliberations in Brothers penalty phase Defense attorney finishes closing argument Defense continues closing argument Defense attorney begins his closing argument Prosecutor finishes closing argument February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Prosecutor finishes closing argument
“Why was Vincent Brothers able to give the same kind of attention to his own daughter Margaret...why did Mr. brothers attend his niece Tanya’s eighth grade graduation and not his own daughter’s,” Green said.
“It was that they only know Vincent Brothers in a professional capacity, none of them, not one of them knew him. This man did not have any friends...If the truth be told nobody knew him. The co-workers testimony mirrored that of the women he slept with...he really had no friends,” Green said this was the same as his childhood friends. “That he was studious, polite, shy, athletic, but not one of them had any contact with him in adulthood...they came here to stand up and testify from memory...the boy that these men described is not the same man you’ve seen and heard from in this courtroom the man who testified in this courtroom...They don’t want to believe he could have changed....but each and every one of you know better and you said so in your verdict.” “Would you expect them to believe that someone they know and liked 25 years ago would would do something like this?” Green told the jurors. “Who would believe that someone they know is capable of what happened in this face, capable of killing their entire family.” “They did not see him often and when they did there is no evidence their relationship is close,” Green said, speaking so quietly, her voice was at times inaudible from the audience. “Is any of that enough to cause you to return a verdict of life...does any of what they said mitigate waht he did. Does anything they said make you think Brothers deserves to spend the rest of his life eating, drinking, laughing,” “The boy who did that 30 years ago, that person does not exist any more, you know that,” Green said. “The man you see before you is the face of evil. There is no sugarcoating that. Is there anything about what the defendant’s 25 witnesses offered that cause you to say this is an extenuating circumstance that justifies voting for life,” “My answer is no, never,” Green said. “Vincent Brothers took an oath to tell the truth and he looked you in the eye and he lied” Green said. “He made up a story that he was in Columbus Ohio when he was in (California) killing his family.” “When Mr. Bryan argues lingering doubt, you remember that he lied,” Green said Brothers’ demeanor on the stand will erase any lingering doubt. Green shows the jurors the video of the crime scene the day the Harper family was found. The courtroom stood still as Green played the video that panned past the bodies and through the house. “When Mr. Bryan gets up here....In a loving home often pictures are displayed on the wall...when Mr. Bryan brings up all these pictures the defendant had just remember the photos he had were not out, were not displayed...They were in a bin on the floor in that apartment.” Green told the jurors that one juror said life in prison gives you time to take care of your soul. “I think while that may be true as to some people...it is not true of Vincent Brothers...your conscience is a part of your soul and you can’t take care of your sould if you don’t have a conscience. “When Vincent Brothers walked in that room with the intent of killing his entire family that is what he saw was three sleeping children,” Green displays once again the photo montage of the family. “In the space of an afternoon the lives of three children were brought to an end...the hopes and dreams of the people they would become were gone,” “If you don’t believes these crimes impacted the community...you need only look at that photo and the testimony of Vincent Brothers who said more than 2,000 people attended that memorial,” Green said. Bryan will ask you “to show Vincent brothers mercy and to allow him the rest of his life behind bars. I have heard it said that justice is getting what you deserve and mercy is getting what you don’t deserve. Vincent Brothers deserves as much mercy as he showed his victims and that is none,” Green said. “If not the death penalty for this case than which case, if not the death penalty for these victims, for which victims, if not the death penalty for Vincent Brothers,” “In the killing of these women and these children...I will not stand up here and talk about how many times they are shot because I know you know...Only the most soulless coward could commit crimes such as these. Are there any more innocent victims,” Green said that if they don’t vote for the death penalty they will be sending a message to the community that this is tollerated. 11 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
anonymous
on May 28, 2007 at 07:55 AM
Anon !:50 Also explain why you followed this case. Do you have a prior relationship with Brothers that may taint your objectivity? I'm afraid allthe appeals in the world won't change the final outcome of this case nor should it. The facts of the case show that Brothers plotted a murder and constructed an alibi that fell through. It is what it is. Life for the rest of us goes on, life for Mr. Brother's victims- does not. posted by
anonymous
on May 27, 2007 at 06:59 PM
01:50, You say that you're a "respected attorney." I find that an odd thing for one to say about oneself. May I ask just who respects you? I know that this sounds like a confrontational question. I do, however, request the answer to satisfy my legitimate curiosity. posted by
anonymous
on May 27, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Excuse me, I thought Vincent Brothers had no appeal, well in Kern anyway.
posted by
sagefever
on May 27, 2007 at 02:21 PM
posted by
anonymous
on May 27, 2007 at 01:50 PM
Yes Vincent Brothers will receive the Appeal that he deserves because Judge Bush made so many errors in his rulings. The first and biggest one is that he let himself remain as the judge when he was asked to recuse himself. DA Greene assisted in Mr. Bush's journey to his judges throne and more than that they are "buddies" to an extent that any Appeals Court, even the 5th District, will be bound to grant an appeal on that fact alone. There are many many more. Each and every time that the defense asked for a mistrial was the groundsetting for an appealable argument and more than 90% were legitimate. And before you accuse, yes I am an attorney and NO I am not a criminal defense attorney.....I am a respected litigation attorney who followed this miscarriage of justice from beginning to end. posted by
anonymous
on May 27, 2007 at 01:10 PM
Like anybody cars, mean justice has been served, live with it! We don't need no stinking evidence for our convictions.
posted by
anonymous
on May 27, 2007 at 01:07 PM
With no believeable alibi, Brothers won't get an appeal. P.S. in an appeal is the burden of proof on the prosecution? Since Brothers is no longer "innocent" doesn't the appeal give HIM the chance to prove why his trial was unjust- if he believes it was unjust. The best way to prove that is to say I wasn't here because I was here. Without Troy or his "frat brother" confirming Brother's alibi- I don't see the taxpayers wasting their money and risking putting this convicted killer of children back on the streets.
posted by
anonymous
on May 26, 2007 at 11:44 AM
When this case is tossed back to the trial judge after being successfully appealed, Brothers will have the sense not to testify, and then, without new evidence, I'd bet by 2 cents, he is acquitted.
posted by
anonymous
on May 26, 2007 at 10:51 AM
The Prosecutor implied that Vincent Brothers is the face of evil, in Prosecutor presents closing argument - posted Wedns. May 23, 2007 at 02:01 p.m. Are the real faces of evil being convicted? Prosecutor stated, I do not have the burden of proof any longer. " The Prosecutor had the burden of proof. She had an obligation to have him convicted and she succeeded in convincing the jury to convict him. Testimony posed April 24,2007 at 3:41 p. m., found in May 2007 archives includes more information than the testimoney posted 04-30-07 at 11.23 a.m. Prosecution questions Brothers about trips to Ohio - posted on Wedns. April 25, 2007 at 02:23 p.m., found in April 2007 archives, there is a lot of missing information in questioning and referring to locations, leaving from , destinations and when?
posted by
culvermoon
on May 23, 2007 at 10:11 PM
Peggyp...........yes we obeyed the laws of the land, but God did not mean to have two wrongs make a right. Actually the jury has a choice and either choice will satisy the law of the land. I used to believe in the death penalty, when I became saved, I knew God did not mean take a life to pay for a life. Mr. Brothers will be absolutely miserable if he got life without parole. Prisoners have their own rules, you do not kill children and live very long on death row. You have to remember that lifers in prison have nothing to lose, one blind spot in prison, one mistake by Brothers, and they will take him out in a pine box. He deserves to die Peggyp, but I wouldn't vote for it if i was a juror, only because I know for a fact prison is pure hell, he will die a miserable man. Tears still fall down my cheeks when I think of seeing those little graves with those little children that never got a chance to love, fall in love, have friends, or have a life other then their few precious years on this earth. posted by
peggyp
on May 23, 2007 at 06:25 PM
I'm not God But I love him, & it says to abide by the laws of the land & if he were to get the death penalty for the crime he commited then I would say "we have obayed the laws of the land"
1
|