Member Since: February 13, 2007 Last Signed In: September 27, 2007 Profile Views: 4355 Blog Views: 84735 Brothers' attorneys face contempt hearing Judge: Brothers deserves to die Jury recommends Brothers should receive the death penalty VERDICT IN DEATH PENALTY No Verdict This Week Jury begins deliberations in Brothers penalty phase Defense attorney finishes closing argument Defense continues closing argument Defense attorney begins his closing argument Prosecutor finishes closing argument February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 
RSS 2.0    Share!
|
|
|
Jury begins deliberations in Brothers penalty phase
The jury has begun deliberating in the penalty phase of the Vincent Brothers trial.
The jury has already convicted Brothers of killing his wife, three children and his mother-in-law. The jury will now decide if Brothers should live or die. 17 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
anonymous
on May 23, 2007 at 04:35 PM
Let him live in misery,.......or maybe sweat it out with the death penalty.
posted by
anonymous
on May 23, 2007 at 06:23 PM
Deliberations, in a Black Kern murder case? They are just deciding the size of the needle!!
posted by
anonymous
on May 23, 2007 at 08:18 PM
anon2, what's your theory on who really did it? Maybe it was the same person that killed Nicole Brown? I am glad in Kern County our DA gets the job done! Good Work Lisa Green!!!!! posted by
anonymous
on May 23, 2007 at 08:31 PM
Testimony posted 04-24-07 3:41p,m, April 07 archives. Verdict reached .... May 07 archives. Evidence? & nbsp; &n bsp; &nb sp; &nbs p; ; & nbsp; &n bsp; &nb sp; &nbs p; ; posted by
anonymous
on May 23, 2007 at 11:17 PM
Lisa Green did it! And yes they get the job done, wrong person, but done to Kern Standards.
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 07:03 AM
Excuse me....didn't Brothers all but admit to being the guilty party when he lipped his apologies and prayers to Eddie Harper (son, brother, and uncle of the victims)???? He's lied so much on the stand that even HE doesn't know when he's telling the truth anymore!! Way to go Lisa Green!!! She did an exellent job...and as a lone soldier!! It took 2 different defense attorneys to try and keep his lying butt out of jail!! And they STILL FAILED! Lisa did her homework for months and came out ready to prosecute....and prosecute she did!! posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 08:46 AM
I agree Lisa did a great job, but one of the high school kids who participate in the mock trials could have made Gardina and Bryan look like the goofs they are...
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 12:39 PM
Anon 6:23 The race card playa. I noticed yesterday nobody on these boards played the race card. It was also curious that that also happened to be the day all Brothers old friends were in court talking about how nice he was 27 years ago. What a coincidence that when his old buddies are in court and away from their computers, there's no race card played on these boards. Once they are out of court, here's the race card again. Sort of makes me say HUMMMMM?!
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 12:45 PM
How disingenuous to say that brother confessed to harper, he could have said F**k**%, and none would know the difference, you are just assuming that because the greelady said so, it is so. He probably said he did not do it, who knows, are you a lip reader or a lip syncher?
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 12:48 PM
Or else the probation department did a "sweep", and they were "temporarily unavailable".
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 01:08 PM
It wasn't clear what he was saying when Eddie Harper was leaving the stand, but it was obvious he was in a praying position. He could have been praying to god. how did EB come to the conclusion that it appeared to be a threat?
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 01:19 PM
Praying, or preying, how do you know? Assuming as usual.
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 01:33 PM
Compare the testimony posted 04-30-07 at 11:23 a.m. which seems to be missing information compared to Testimony posted April 24, 2007 at 3:41 p.m. Both testimonies found in April 2007 archives.
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 01:49 PM
You all are a bunch of lamos! You guys have nothing better to do than to sit up here all day talking crap about a man you do not know!
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 01:51 PM
Kind of like all his friends who testified they "know" him....
posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 05:46 PM
01:49, I'm always amused with those who act indignant over an activity of which they are--by the vary act of indignation--partaking. posted by
anonymous
on May 24, 2007 at 05:51 PM
"...talking crap about a man you do not know!" I don't WANT to know him...but we all know OF him because of his abhorrent, sub-human behavior.
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS: Loading Stories
|