|
Gustavo -- Is God telling us to ignore the Republican Convention? Could it be a woman will show us the way? Vets for Freedom Ad -- One of the best I've seen....... Who will McCain choose? I just watched the Obama-McCain Saddleback Forum and......... The Obamasiuhhhh........... 10 reasons not to vote for him...... It really IS as simple as THIS............... Swimming & Drooling............ You Gotta LOVE This Dog! Obama Will Revive Redistributionism................. Did Anyone see the Asteroid reported on KCAL9? July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 http://www.sounddogs.com/pr...
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
New Body Armor - Its About Time!
Soldiers Test New Body Armor Design
Army News Service | Maj. Wayne Marotto | January 25, 2008
Learn more about Army service opportunities.
10 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:08 AM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:10 AM
Check out www.military.com You can find your old buds from the service. Even "blog" about stuff. I've looked up several buds from VN, boot camp, AIT, etc. Very kewl IMHO posted by
TomW
on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:21 AM
If McCain wins, we may even have time to deploy this armor. :) Seriously, I'm glad that they are testing new armor. What ever happened to Dragon Skin? I know the contractors were all using it. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 31, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Army: Dragon Skin armor failed battery of testsFindings released after NBC reports it could be superior to military geargetCSS("3088867") WASHINGTON - In a rare move, the U.S. Army on Monday released a barrage of test results showing that a privately sold flexible body armor that some families have sought for their soldiers failed extensive military testing.Pieces of the hefty Dragon Skin armor, with ragged holes torn through its yellow inner skin, were propped up on the floor in the Pentagon, as Army officials systematically detailed the battery of ammunition and temperature testing the armor failed. Although the tests were done nearly a year ago, the Army declined to release details until Monday, after recent NBC News reports suggested that the Dragon Skin may be better than the Army-issued Interceptor armor. posted by
mattloch
on Jan 31, 2008 at 12:59 PM
I'd like to know how the military "tested" the Dragon Skin. Is this M-16-style "testing", or actual testing? posted by
TomW
on Jan 31, 2008 at 03:18 PM
Mattloch, a bit of reading makes it seem like the vests have issues at temperatures over 120 degrees. posted by
Lingtaowoo
on Jan 31, 2008 at 03:24 PM
FINALLY...body armor that works??? I hope it doesn't cost more than a 4 thousand dollar hammer.... how did they test it ~Chico~..... posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 31, 2008 at 04:55 PM
The M-16 wasn't a bad weapon Matt. I don't care what some of its detractors say. And it doesn't have "accidental discharges" either. Even with the charging handle Not sure if thats what you were talking about but I once started a whole sh*tload of consternation by telling a trooper from Iraq who was complaining about getting an Art 15 for an "accidental" M-16 discharge into a bbl designed for that purpose. And he was an officer. There are no "accidentla" discharges. The 16 was loaded in a place where it shouldn't have been (mess hall) and the bbls are only precautionary for screw ups. Youi have still screwed up and are subject to the art 15. posted by
mattloch
on Jan 31, 2008 at 06:00 PM
No Chico. Read about what it took to get the M-16 into service. The Army generals in charge of testing did everything they could to rig the "tests" so that the rifle would fail. This wasn't failure testing, this was testing to fail. Removing parts, using faulty ammo, incorrect weather testing, etc. posted by
Oenghus
on Jan 31, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Dragon Skin doesn't meet NIJ standards. It has serious endurance issues. I recently had a rep from Pinnacle try to talk me into changing from my current armor supplier to Pinnacle. I wouldn't do it. If the company can't meet NIJ standards soon, it may not even exist in a couple of years, or if it does, all its sales will be foreign.
1
Our readers recommend: |