A blog about Politics.
About ChicoEsquela


Real Name:
Chico Esquela
Address:
23543 Avenue 56, Ducor, CA
Biggest Butler Bldg=>TeePee
Ducor, CA 93218
Cell:
(esc)uch-enes
Date of Birth:
December 14, 1945
Member Since:
July 31, 2007
Last Signed In:
September 06, 2008
Profile Views:
2408
Blog Views:
20402
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Gustavo -- Is God telling us to ignore the Republican Convention?
Could it be a woman will show us the way?
Vets for Freedom Ad -- One of the best I've seen.......
Who will McCain choose?
I just watched the Obama-McCain Saddleback Forum and.........
The Obamasiuhhhh........... 10 reasons not to vote for him......
It really IS as simple as THIS...............
Swimming & Drooling............ You Gotta LOVE This Dog!
Obama Will Revive Redistributionism.................
Did Anyone see the Asteroid reported on KCAL9?
Archives
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08

http://www.sounddogs.com/pr... 

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


ChicoEsquela - > MOO! -> New Body Armor - Its About Time!
New Body Armor - Its About Time!
Soldiers Test New Body Armor Design
Army News Service | Maj. Wayne Marotto | January 25, 2008

BAUMHOLDER, Germany -- For as long as the Army has used Interceptor Body Armor, Soldiers have complained that it is too heavy, too hot and too cumbersome.

But those complaints may be a thing of the past for Soldiers in U.S. Army Europe's 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division. Those Soldiers recently donned the Army's newest body armor -- the Improved Outer Tactical Vest.

"The IOTV is a lot more comfortable because of the mesh lining inside," said Sgt. Brian Freeman, a tanker with 2nd BCT's 1st Battalion, 35th Armor. "The waist strap also makes it fit better by redistributing the weight off my shoulders and moving it around my waist."

Freeman ought to know. He deployed with the 2nd BCT for the first iteration of Operation Iraqi Freedom carrying woodland camouflage pattern IBA.

"We didn't even get small arms protection insert plates until the fifth month in country," said Freeman. "I like the mesh lining; it makes it more comfortable."

The mesh is intended to keep the wearer's body cooler by improving ventilation.

The IOTV is the Army's latest evolution of body armor designed to protect the Soldier's torso area.

According to information released by the Army's Program Executive Office Soldier, the agency in charge of developing and fielding new equipment, the IOTV meets PEO Soldier's goals of providing troops the most advanced protective gear available, while also improving comfort and mission effectiveness.

The Army spent a good deal of time asking Soldiers for suggestions and feedback about existing body armor, and then tested new designs based on their responses.

As a result, the IOTV has several advantages over its predecessor. It is three pounds lighter; it provides more coverage in the small of the back; it sits higher around the armpit area; and it sits lower on the torso, said Tony Perez, Team 5 fielding leader for Engineering Solution Products, the contractor selected by the Army to field the IOTV to the 2nd BCT.

Perez noted that the new design addresses one of the biggest complaints about earlier body armor models -- that the addition of side SAPI plates forced the Soldier's arms awkwardly away from his body.

"The side plates on the IOTV are in a better position, decreasing the profile and allowing better arm movement," Perez said.

Brigade Soldiers who tried on the IOTV called it a welcome improvement.

"The IBA had zero cushioning inside, especially on the shoulders," Freeman said. "The IOTV fits better and it has a quick release, which makes it better than the IBA."

The quick-release cable feature allows Soldiers to get out of the IOTV with one pull by disassembling the vest into two parts that fall to the ground. That innovation should help a Soldier get out of the IOTV quickly when needed -- such as when a military vehicle rolls over into water -- allowing him to escape the submerging vehicle or be pulled more easily to safety. The quick release should also help medics to treat injured or wounded Soldiers quickly.

Pfc. Tony Gonzales, a tank driver for 1-35th Armor, said the IOTV "is a lot better, because it fits better around the body and is more comfortable."

Pfc. William Fraleigh, an infantryman from the 2nd BCT's A Company, 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry, conceded that the IOTV allows for better flexibility and movement, and even admitted that the quick-release could prove invaluable if needed during an emergency. But giving up his IBA will be like throwing away a comfortable pair of old shoes, and he was a bit superstitious about the idea.

"It always worked for me in combat and I felt comfortable in it," said Fraleigh.

"I liked the IBA better, because it is easier to put on than the IOTV. I don't like the emergency quick-release, because it might get snagged on something during a patrol and the body armor comes undone. You don't have time to put it back together while patrolling."

The 2nd BCT continues its preparation for its scheduled spring deployment to Iraq.

(Maj. Wayne Marotto is the public affairs officer for 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division.)

 

Learn more about Army service opportunities.

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by ChicoEsquela on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 08:06 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 41 times
10 comments from 5 users

1

posted by ChicoEsquela on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:08 AM

Now this is the kind of innovation I like to see!

Couldn't happen to a better bunch of folks!

posted by ChicoEsquela on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:10 AM

Check out www.military.com 

You can find your old buds from the service.

Even "blog" about stuff.

I've looked up several buds from VN, boot camp, AIT, etc.

Very kewl IMHO

posted by TomW on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:21 AM

If McCain wins, we may even have time to deploy this armor.  :)

Seriously, I'm glad that they are testing new armor.  What ever happened to Dragon Skin?  I know the contractors were all using it.

posted by ChicoEsquela on Jan 31, 2008 at 09:56 AM

Army: Dragon Skin armor failed battery of tests

Findings released after NBC reports it could be superior to military gear

getCSS("3088867") WASHINGTON - In a rare move, the U.S. Army on Monday released a barrage of test results showing that a privately sold flexible body armor that some families have sought for their soldiers failed extensive military testing.

Pieces of the hefty Dragon Skin armor, with ragged holes torn through its yellow inner skin, were propped up on the floor in the Pentagon, as Army officials systematically detailed the battery of ammunition and temperature testing the armor failed.

Although the tests were done nearly a year ago, the Army declined to release details until Monday, after recent NBC News reports suggested that the Dragon Skin may be better than the Army-issued Interceptor armor.

posted by mattloch on Jan 31, 2008 at 12:59 PM

I'd like to know how the military "tested" the Dragon Skin. Is this M-16-style "testing", or actual testing?

posted by TomW on Jan 31, 2008 at 03:18 PM

Mattloch, a bit of reading makes it seem like the vests have issues at temperatures over 120 degrees.

posted by Lingtaowoo on Jan 31, 2008 at 03:24 PM

FINALLY...body armor that works??? I hope it doesn't cost more than a 4 thousand dollar hammer.... how did they test it ~Chico~.....

posted by ChicoEsquela on Jan 31, 2008 at 04:55 PM

The M-16 wasn't a bad weapon Matt. I don't care what some of its detractors say.

And it doesn't have "accidental discharges" either. Even with the charging handle

Not sure if thats what you were talking about but I once started a whole sh*tload of consternation by telling a trooper from Iraq who was complaining about getting an Art 15 for an "accidental" M-16 discharge into a bbl designed for that purpose. And he was an officer.

There are no "accidentla" discharges. The 16 was loaded in a place where it shouldn't have been (mess hall) and the bbls are only precautionary for screw ups. Youi have still screwed up and are subject to the art 15.

posted by mattloch on Jan 31, 2008 at 06:00 PM

No Chico. Read about what it took to get the M-16 into service. The Army generals in charge of testing did everything they could to rig the "tests" so that the rifle would fail. This wasn't failure testing, this was testing to fail. Removing parts, using faulty ammo, incorrect weather testing, etc.

Tom, the Dragon Skin vests have ceramic plates in them. Are they saying that ceramic has problems at 120*F? How do they think they make ceramic?

posted by Oenghus on Jan 31, 2008 at 10:27 PM

Dragon Skin doesn't meet NIJ standards. It has serious endurance issues.

I recently had a rep from Pinnacle try to talk me into changing from my current armor supplier to Pinnacle. I wouldn't do it. If the company can't meet NIJ standards soon, it may not even exist in a couple of years, or if it does, all its sales will be foreign.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: