|
Gay Marriage Based On Religious Freedom Must Be Consistent A "Christian Nation" -- Impossible Even By Religious Right's Criteria The Only Gay Marriage Argument You'll Ever Need My Thoughts on the In God We Trust Scare A Spooky (And True) Story of Precognition World's 3rd Richest Man Says Taxes on the Rich Are Too Low New Right's War on the Constitution: The Under-Reported Truth Religious Right Group's Belief in Religious Freedom Does Not Extend to Others Take The Time To Fight Phishing Creationist Betrays True Motives (Again) July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 News, views, and professional iconoclasm from the green side of libertarianism. About the graphic: Created by Yours Truly using Ray Dream Studio. - Take The Time To Fight Phishing
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
More Philosophical Nuts to Crack
Since the previous post of this nature was so much fun, let's try another ride on the Starship into the ionosphere of thought. __________________________
__________________________
__________________________
_________________________
__________________________
__________________________
43 comments from 10 users
1
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 12, 2007 at 04:40 PM
If God is eternal, then God existed for an infinite duration of time before deciding to create the universe. What was God doing in this infinite amount of time?
Careful, Hardliner. You invite Augustine's rebuttal to *THAT* one. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 12, 2007 at 04:43 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 12, 2007 at 04:47 PM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 12, 2007 at 04:48 PM
posted by
woofwoof
on Jun 12, 2007 at 05:14 PM
Really, I feel like this is a scene in Animal House with Donald Sutherland.... Anywho, why, when I play Yahtzee, do I always roll 3's and 6's? posted by
sagefever
on Jun 12, 2007 at 05:47 PM
posted by
Katatak
on Jun 12, 2007 at 06:08 PM
To me, the intellectual and philosophical speculations about God are quite separate from beliefs. The speculative questions are by their very nature unanswerable in my view, and in the view of many, though utterly fascinating to mull over. Where belief becomes important to me is in how it operates and how it is operated on by the changes we go through in our lives. I have a "personalized" relationship to God that is useful to others as well as myself. My beliefs come into play when someone is close to suicide, feeling murderous, or otherwise filled with the worst this world can dish out. It is ready in time of need and there isn't any pat speech but there is a useful "something" that can help in dire situations: Hope that there is meaning and purpose for suffering and a reason to find another, better path. Sometimes, just to survive one more day. I am willing to believe that hope is an evidence of something unseen, for the sake of goodness. Unfortunately, as I have been compelled to acquire in a peas and cups' life: the road to "hell" is paved with abundant experience of identifying cups that lack the pea every time. I am pretty good at that. Sam, in his blog, pulls the tablecloths out from underneath life's table settings continuously, those cups and peas, and I have concluded, maybe even similar to him, we don't know what we don't know and the rest falls into the realm of beliefs, opinions, and speculations based on degrees of evidence subjected to scrutiny. Such pitfalls kept in mind, a particular pleasure I get in talking to children is watching their faces light up when I tell them they are made of the same "stuff" as the stars that twinkle in the night. What an amazing, mind expanding thing for a child to entertain in his or her imagination. And, what is even better, it is the truth. I gain intense pleasure from the mysteries of life but I live for what is greater than the sum of its' parts, and that, my friend, is a gift indeed. I liked your blog, thanks.
posted by
sagefever
on Jun 12, 2007 at 06:11 PM
posted by
buffoo
on Jun 12, 2007 at 08:56 PM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 12, 2007 at 09:04 PM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 12, 2007 at 09:08 PM
posted by
mattloch
on Jun 12, 2007 at 09:27 PM
I'm still waiting. posted by
anonymous
on Jun 12, 2007 at 09:31 PM
For the question of the existence of God, I'll grab a bottle of good red wine and a nice piece of smoked Monterey Jack cheese, and mull over Epicurus's three questions:
Is he [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then is he impotent. Is he able but not willing? Then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil? posted by
buffoo
on Jun 12, 2007 at 10:29 PM
posted by
woofwoof
on Jun 12, 2007 at 10:30 PM
posted by
buffoo
on Jun 12, 2007 at 10:33 PM
posted by
Katatak
on Jun 13, 2007 at 06:24 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 13, 2007 at 07:21 AM
posted by
mattloch
on Jun 13, 2007 at 08:48 AM
posted by
buffoo
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:08 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:16 AM
posted by
steveeswenson
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:27 AM
I don't know what God was doing before he created the universe, but I'm suspecting he got bored and created it for entertainment. God knows what we are going to do. That doesn't make it predetermined. We have choices (free will) and that doesn't go away just because he knows which choice we take. I don't know what out of time means. Raising Himself back to life seems to me to be a miracle. There's not an unknown phenomenon that would account for that, especially on a three-day time table. God bless all of your for you thoughts and participation in His world. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Of course, if we keep playing games, we're only helping to convince Buffoo that all we have is a bluff.
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:32 AM
Steve wrote, "I don't know what out of time means. " Google this: http://www.google.com/searc... Particularly, this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wik... It's quite an old argument and theory that remains popular today.
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:42 AM
Steve postulated, "God knows what we are going to do. That doesn't make it predetermined. We have choices (free will) and that doesn't go away just because he knows which choice we take." Well, let's run with that. If we have true free will, then our future actions cannot be predicted with 100% certainty -- by anyone. On the other hand, if external influences constrain our ranges of choices, then our actions become more predictable. Here's a thought-provoker: If we have no immediate desire to commit suicide, do we truly have the free will to jump off of a tall building? I'm not so sure. Mentally place yourself in that situation -- and realize that, just maybe, you don't. Determinism, specifically causal determinism, asserts that every cause has only one possible outcome. For God to know each and every action that we will ever take, would seem to imply that in each and every waking moment, each of our actions represent the only possible outcome of the situation that we find ourselves in. There is no free will when there is only one possible course of action. Just something to think about.
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:42 AM
Buffoo can't *PROVE* that I don't have absolute proof of God's nonexistence, H4F. If he produces proof of God, I'll produce my counterproof that God doesn't exist.
posted by
mattloch
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:44 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:47 AM
Buffoo, the problem with "you can't prove God doesn't exist is that it applies equally to *EVERY* God. You can't prove that YHWH doesn't exist. You can't prove that Kali doesn't exist. You can't prove that Zeus, Thor, Ahura Mazda, Xenu don't exist. You can't prove that fairies, leprechauns, or smurfs don't exist. That's why the burden of proof is on *YOU*, not us. You're the one claiming things which cannot be seen, felt, smelled, or detected on radar. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 13, 2007 at 09:57 AM
Speaking of God and freewill, here is something from the Reformed faith, which tries to have it both ways. From the Westminster Confession of Faith: http://www.mbrem.com/confes... And here: http://www.fpcr.org/blue_ba... "This view taught by the Westminster divines is the Calvinistic concept of “determinism” (19-21). The word determinism often carries with it an evil connotation, but this should not be the case. In actuality, determinism expresses a very biblical and high view of God, and it gives us the only plausible theodicy. God determines or decrees every event of history and every action of man." Read the whole paper. This guy is freakin' scary. And it's worth noting that this branch of Christianity -- the "Christian Determinist" branch -- is home to the most militant theocratic force in American politics today.
posted by
steveeswenson
on Jun 13, 2007 at 10:24 AM
With regard to out of time, I read the above links and still don't understand the concept. Maybe it's too big for me to wrap my little mind around. It's also not relevant to my view of life. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 13, 2007 at 10:31 AM
The "outside of time" argument isn't really worth your time, IMHO. I'd say that something that is all-knowing can only know the knowable. Free will introduces unknowability. posted by
mattloch
on Jun 13, 2007 at 10:38 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 13, 2007 at 10:51 AM
I don't see where God's omniscience obviates free will. I think of it as a movie of say "a day in the life" of someone. You've seen the movie, so you know how it ends and how it got there. But during the filming, the subject had free will to choose its course. . God, of course, is responsible for creating the conditions which led to that course. So He does create beings He knows have no chance of avoiding Hell, because He's already seen the movie and set the rules up ahead of time so they'd lose. Kind of like a mean little kid with the magnifying glass at the anthill. The ants are "free" to choose any course they want, but they're still going to fry in the end. He doesn't ask the ant's opinion. Now me, I wouldn't feel right worshipping such a mean little kid. posted by
woofwoof
on Jun 13, 2007 at 11:00 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jun 13, 2007 at 11:27 AM
"I don't see where God's omniscience obviates free will. I think of it as a movie of say "a day in the life" of someone. You've seen the movie, so you know how it ends and how it got there. But during the filming, the subject had free will to choose its course." Ah, but with a movie, you're watching a re-run of the past. There is only one possible outcome of what has already happened: that which happened. (Then, there is the matter of following the script. A good actor makes it look like free will, but in reality, the actor abides by the script.) I understand, though, why most people have little trouble reconciling free will with a God who knows in advance our every action. I'm not saying that their widely held view is philosophically sound -- only a most difficult point to argue convincingly its unsoundness. As I noted to Steve, a God that is omniscient can still be considered omniscient if he knows all that is knowable -- while still leaving unsettled those matters that are unknowable.
posted by
anonymous
on Jun 13, 2007 at 11:35 AM
What if there is a deity of some sort, but there is no personal afterlife? Under such circumstances, does the existence of a deity really matter?
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 13, 2007 at 11:40 AM
Hardliner, what if said God doesn't *KNOW* that there are things He doesn't know--because that is unknowable? . Hey, what if all Cretans are liars? :) posted by
sagefever
on Jun 13, 2007 at 11:44 AM
"If God exists outside of time, can He be anything other than an inert, frozen entity?" Proof positive: Dove bars. posted by
blognroll
on Jun 13, 2007 at 02:47 PM
The answer, once again, is that I don't know. These lyrics are the first thing that come to mind: At night, when all the world's asleep, Supertramp: The Logical Song posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 13, 2007 at 02:50 PM
Dove bars are frozen but hardly inert, sage. . BLT, watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal. posted by
blognroll
on Jun 13, 2007 at 02:53 PM
LOL : ) Actually, I've already been called an "environmental whacko" today, so I wouldn't be surprised if that's the next thing that happens. posted by
sagefever
on Jun 13, 2007 at 08:00 PM
posted by
woofwoof
on Jun 13, 2007 at 08:16 PM
Interesting....
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |