About Hardliner4freedom


Gender:
male
Member Since:
July 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
March 15, 2008
Profile Views:
26807
Blog Views:
13713
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Gay Marriage Based On Religious Freedom Must Be Consistent
A "Christian Nation" -- Impossible Even By Religious Right's Criteria
The Only Gay Marriage Argument You'll Ever Need
My Thoughts on the In God We Trust Scare
A Spooky (And True) Story of Precognition
World's 3rd Richest Man Says Taxes on the Rich Are Too Low
New Right's War on the Constitution: The Under-Reported Truth
Religious Right Group's Belief in Religious Freedom Does Not Extend to Others
Take The Time To Fight Phishing
Creationist Betrays True Motives (Again)
Archives
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
Onward Bound

News, views, and professional iconoclasm from the green side of libertarianism.

About the graphic:  Created by Yours Truly using Ray Dream Studio.

-

Take The Time To Fight Phishing

 

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


Hardliner4freedom - > Starship Sigma +5 -> Another Interesting Story of War-Related Intolerance
Another Interesting Story of War-Related Intolerance

Here's an interesting story of intolerance for free speech that has a close parallel on what some would consider the "other side of the political fence":

http://www.contracostatimes...

"War display has varied meanings

"The objections to the crosses erected across from the Lafayette BART station are very puzzling. How can people who are so supportive of troops going to Iraq to establish democracy find the exercise of free speech so offensive?"

And http://edition.cnn.com/2006...

"Hillside crosses marking fallen soldiers stir debate

"LAFAYETTE, California (AP) -- Hundreds of white wooden crosses planted on a quiet suburban hillside have prompted a debate over whether they honor or exploit the memory of troops killed in Iraq.

Jeff Heaton, who along with local peace group members started putting up the crosses in early November, sees the effort as a simple tribute.

"It seemed like it would be a touching way to make people aware of the true costs of the war," he said.

But to others, the display, on private property opposite a commuter train station and visible from the heavily traveled highway to San Francisco, is an affront that uses personal grief for political ends."

And more info, not quoted here:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-b...

http://www.sacbee.com/110/s...

Now, here's the parallel.

Does that field of crosses remind you of anything?

Something each January?

On church yards?

Abortion stops a beating heart?

That's it.  It reminds me of those fields of crosses erected by pro-life advocates to memorialize the millions of unborn babies killed since the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973.

I, for one, can't get upset over the church displays, because the pro-lifer in me will never die.  It has simply become more pragmatic and realistic, leavened by age and, I would like to think, a better view of the bigger picture.

But among people who are insulted by these churches' political statements each January, I haven't heard any demands by abortion-rights supporters to curtail these churches' free speech.

Someone tell me, have there been acts of vandalism against these pro-life displays over the years?  Has anyone tried to suppress these churches' rights to free speech?

Or is the desire to suppress controversial speech a one-sided ailment in our culture?

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by Hardliner4freedom on Friday, December 1, 2006 at 07:48 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 238 times
3 comments from 3 users

1

posted by Hardliner4freedom on Dec 1, 2006 at 01:35 PM

And another possible blog bug.

I rough-drafted the blog post this morning, but only published it today.

In the past, it would appear at the top of the "New Posts" list.

Now, it appears far down the list -- even though I posted it just three minutes ago, at the time of this writing.

It's as if the New Posts list is now sorted by the time that it was first saved, rather than the time it was first published.

 

posted by TomW on Dec 1, 2006 at 01:42 PM
H4F, don't sweat it.  Most of the people here go by recent posts, not recent blogs.  They go for the action.  All you have to do it post a comment and people show up.

As for the display, I think that it's amazing people would object to "an affront that uses personal grief for political ends."  I mean, isn't that the entire Bush Presidency?
posted by mattloch on Dec 1, 2006 at 01:43 PM
Good thing we're not allowed to see pictures of the flag-draped coffins returning, because that might cause people to think about this war. How dare those soldiers die and be remembered for the political attrocities that got them killed. (Damn exploitive Arlington Cemetery.)  And all those soldiers who died in Vietnam shouldn't be held against LBJ's and Nixon's political legacies, right? It's a sad day when remembering (honoring) soldiers who have died is considered an "exploitive" act of politics.
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement