A blog about Politics, News, and Kern County.
About Infowar


Gender:
male
Member Since:
June 04, 2008
Last Signed In:
November 24, 2009
Profile Views:
1070
Blog Views:
44839
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
CNBC:The ‘Real’ Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
Forget The Emails, Code Discusses “Artificially Adjusted” Temperatures
BBC Climate Correspondent Was Forwarded CRU Emails Five Weeks Before They Were Made Public
Climate Alarmists Finally Admit The Debate Is Not Over
New EU President Rompuy announces 2009 as “first year of global governance”
London Guardian: Global body needed to direct green technology, G77 says
Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud Implodes
Couple Busted for Refusing to Pay Tip
Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate!
ANOTHER BLOW TO THE MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING RELIGION
Archives
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09

"IF YOUR'E GOING TO PUT YOUR FAMILY IN A NURSING HOME... YOU BETTER VISIT THEM AT LEAST EVERY TWO DAYS, YOU BETTER LIVE NEAR THEM, YOU BETTER BRING THEM LUNCH, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND WATCH TV WITH THEM, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND RUB THERE FEET AND LOVE YOUR PARENTS (voice raises in anger) THAT WIPED YOUR BUTT, THAT TOOK CARE OF YOU, YOU SCUMBAG YUPPIES!!!"

-Alex Jones speaking to yuppies (and all Americans for that matter)

 

"What a bunch of garbage, liberal, Democratic, conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!"

--Alex Jones

 

We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.

Author: David Rockefeller, Source: Trilateral Commission meeting, June, 1991

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


Infowar - > Crashing through the phony left-right paradigm -> Obama To Fund Forced Abortions
Obama To Fund Forced Abortions

Obama will fund global family planning: US lawmaker

WASHINGTON (AFP) — US president-elect Barack Obama will lift a freeze on funding for global family planning programs imposed by the outgoing administration, a US lawmaker said Wednesday.

"We are about to see major cultural change in Washington," Democratic lawmaker Carolyn Maloney told reporters at the launch of the UN population agency's (UNFPA) annual State of World Population report.

"One big change is that UNFPA will be funded," added the congresswoman to applause.

"And I am confident that the recommendations in this report will be taken to heart and listened to and studied by our new president," Maloney said of this year's report, which looks at how to promote women's rights by working within the limits of different cultures.

The Obama transition team has not said exactly what the president-elect intends to do upon taking office January 20, though transition co-chair John Podesta said Sunday the incoming adminstration was reviewing "virtually every agency to see where we can move forward."

Outgoing President George W. Bush blocked funding for the UNFPA during his two terms in office, saying the UN agency supports coercive abortion methods in China, a report issued in June by the Guttmacher Institute research group said.

In support of the funding freeze, the Bush administration cited a US law passed in 1985 which prohibits US foreign aid for any organization that the president determines "supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization."

"UNFPA operates in more than 150 poor countries, but does not provide or pay for abortion services in any of them," the Guttmacher report said.

"Instead, UNFPA works to reduce the need for abortion by promoting voluntary family planning," it said.

The Bush administration also backed abstinence-only sex education programs in US schools.

"The new administration will face a lot of challenges but we hope that they support and encourage our programs, especially in family planning and AIDS," said UNAIDS senior adviser Pauline Muchina at the launch of the UNFPA report.

"We believe that family planning is very important... it's not a luxury of whether or not you're going to have premarital sex. People need to have access to certain services," said senior UNFPA culture adviser Azza Karam.

According to the State of World Population report, 60 percent of the world's poorest people are women and girls; two-thirds of the 960 million adults around the world who cannot read are women; and 70 percent of children who do not go to school are girls.

Even when laws are enacted to protect women and girls, such as legislation banning child marriage or female genital mutilation, they are sometimes ignored because of cultural practices, Karam said.

"Sometimes, culture is an issue of life or death. One woman dies every minute somewhere in the world because of complications during birth," she said.

But foisting Western solutions on other cultures will not always help.

"We should not impose our own ideologies, our own systems on any other country. The current administration has proven that just does not work," said Maloney.

"To bring about change," she said, reprising an Obama campaign mantra, "We have to be culturally sensitive."

Building maternity clinics in Bolivia would probably not reduce maternal deaths because women in the Andean country prefer having their babies at home, the aid officials at the launch said.

But a UNFPA program to teach Eritrean and Ethiopian clerics about the potentially deadly effects of child marriage on girls -- they get pregnant very early, go on to have many children and run an increased risk of death from birth complications -- led to an agreement from them to stop blessing the marriages.

"Once fathers understand the impact a practice will have on their daughters, they will act differently," said Muchina.

Maloney, who was re-elected to a ninth congressional term last week, said she was "very hopeful, in many ways" about the Obama presidency.

"Six times under Bush, the House of Representatives and the Senate passed funding to continue the critical work of the UNFPA," she said.

"President Obama will have to do nothing but let the will of Congress go through."

___________________________________

 

Obama to fund forced abortions

De-funded during the Bush Administration, US money for the UN Population Fund that supports China's policy of coercive abortion will flow again during the Obama Administrations, say supporters.

By CNA 

www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp

Supporters of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) are confident that President-elect Barack Obama will reverse the Bush administration’s 2002 decision to stop the $40 million it received in U.S. funding. The policy was instated because of UNFPA’s support for China’s one-child policy, which includes coercive abortion practices.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D – N.Y.) said the funding will be approved by the Democratic majority Congress. Her comments came while speaking Wednesday at a press conference at the National Press Club where the 2008 U.N. report on world population was released.

“You know the president will have to do nothing,” said Maloney. “He will just have to let the will of Congress go through. One of the changes is that UNFPA will be funded,” CNSNews.com reports.

The Bush administration in 2002 had stopped funding the organization, citing the Kemp-Kasten Amendment which prohibits funds from being available to organizations or programs determined to be supporting or participating in coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization programs.

In July of 2008, Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte announced that for the sixth year in a row, the government had determined that “UNFPA provides support for and participates in the management of the Chinese government’s program of coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization.”

Rep. Maloney reported that she discusses UNFPA funding controversies in her book “Rumors of Our Progress are Greatly Exaggerated.” She said the UNFPA was founded “with American leadership” and “was supported strongly by George Bush’s father.”

The new UN report, “Reaching Common Ground: Culture, Gender and Human Rights,” calls for “cultural sensitivity” to “mitigate and overcome cultural resistance to couples and individuals using modern contraception.” It claims to prepare for the empowerment of women with control over their fertility.

Nevertheless, Rep. Maloney claimed the U.S. will no longer “impose our own ideology” under the UNFPA funding changes.

She said Obama “has already said his administration will change the way we do business in Washington and that improving the role of women around the world is going to be one of his prominent priorities.

“I am thrilled with this report, and I am really thrilled at the new direction of our government,” Maloney said, according to CNSNews.com.

 

______________________________________

 

Congress Will Fund UNFPA, Forced Abortions for Obama, Representative Says


by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
November 13
, 2008

www.lifenews.com/int984.html

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- One of the leading pro-abortion members of the House of Representatives says Congress will do the dirty work for incoming president Barack Obama when it comes to funding the UNFPA and forced abortions. Rep. Carolyn Maloney held a press conference Wednesday discussing the taxpayer funding.

Maloney told reporters that the Democratic-controlled Congress, run by abortion advocates, will restore the $40 million annual funding to the UNFPA with Obama's support.

“You know the president will have to do nothing,” Maloney said, according to CNS News. “He will just have to let the will of Congress go through. One of the changes is that UNFPA will be funded.”

Maloney's press conference coincided with a new United Nation's report on population and she told reporters that a major change in attitude towards the pro-abortion United Nations will come into play with Obama in the White House.

“This report could not be more timely,” CNS reporting Maloney saying.

“It’s all about cultural change, and we are really about to see major cultural change in Washington. Part of that hope and change will be a new attitude toward reports like this one, and I am confident we can be very sure (the report) will be taken to heart and listened and studied by our new president," she added.

She said she is "thrilled" with the new pro-abortion direction the Obama administration will take and said the United States will no longer “impose our own ideology” against abortion.

If Congress or the Obama administration restore the UNFPA funding, Douglas Johnson, the legislative director for National Right to Life, tells LifeNews.com it would be looking the other way at a federal law prohibiting the funding of groups that are involved in forced abortion programs.

"Since 1985, U.S. law has prohibited funding any organization that supports a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization," Johnson explained.

"The UNFPA has been a cheerleader for, and participant in, China's coercive population control program. In order to restore funding to the UNFPA, Obama will have to turn a blind eye to the law," Johnson added.

The Kemp-Kasten Anti-Coercion law prohibits U.S. "population assistance" funds from going to any organization that “supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”

The last time Congress voted on the law was in September 2007, when the Senate , in crafting the Fiscal Year 2008 State-Foreign Operations Appropriations Bill, removed the traditional Kemp-Kasten language and replaced it with a far weaker provision.

When the bill reached the Senate floor, pro-life Senator Sam Brownback, a Kansas Republican, offered an amendment to restore the traditional Kemp-Kasten anti-coercion language.

The Brownback Amendment passed, 48 to 45, but the Senate's membership will lack as many pro-life votes next year and it will be easier for abortion advocates to restore UNFPA funding.

The last House vote came in June 2005 when Maloney an amendment to prohibit enforcement of "any provision of law that prohibits or restricts funding for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)."

The Maloney amendment failed 233 to 192, but pro-abortion gains in the House will make it easier to adopt the Maloney amendment or remove it if inserted in the budget during the committee markup.

Pro-life advocates may have to rely on a filibuster from pro-life senators to hold up any language in the bill which weakens the Kemp-Kasten law or restores the funding unless it is removed.

______________________________________

 


Commentary & research by Infowar:



This is horrible news. This is all part of the plan to depopulate the planet. China is the model for the New World Order. I can't believe how so many of you blindly support the elites pro-death propaganda.  The world is screwed up because of the elite scumbags who run the planet. Families like the Rockefeller's & Rothschilds make me sick! Just read the U.N. Convention On Biodiversity plan and find out the shocking truth. Dig deep....the text is long and bland. Running a google search yields tons of info.
 Read an article about the Bio diversity plan here: www.freedom.org/reports/srbio.htm
(Google search for: Convention on Biological Diversity)

There is a film out called EndGame that details the elites plan to depopulate the earth of it's human occupants.
The documentary is available on google video here:
video.google.com/videoplay

More info about the film at this link: www.endgamethemovie.com/biblio01.html

Here are a few quotes: (yes these quotes are real,look them up)

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

- Founder of what became Planned Parenthood: Margaret Sanger

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

thinkexist.com/quotes/margaret_sanger/

www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/m/margaretsa391 151.html


"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
- Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter

www.aim.org/wls/five-percent-of-the-present-popul ation-would-be-ideal/

Source: You Don't Say, by Fred Gielow, 1999, page 189.
Hardcopy: Copy of page 189 from Gielow's book.
Where: During an interview with Audubon magazine.

Read an interesting article about Ted Turner from TIME Magazine (1992)

The article is 9 pages long. Here is an excerpt from the article (Page 8)

"He used to talk about war as an efficient way to weed out the weak members of society"

He invented the Turner Tomorrow Awards to inspire writers the world over to write about "positive solutions to global problems," but the contest this year degenerated into a spat over who should get the $500,000 prize. He has issued what some are calling the Ted Commandments, a list of 10 voluntary initiatives that would make the world a better place. (It includes "I promise to have no more than two children" -- a belated pledge, since he has five.) He has told intimates he hopes to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.

Article Link:www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,974622- 1,00.html


"Human happiness, and certainly human fecundity, is not as important as a wild and healthy planets.Some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."
- David Graber, biologist, National Park Service
calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/photographer_query

"One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God's selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death."
- Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard - member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Marx_Hubbard.



“The Aids epidemic, rather than being a scourge,
is a welcome development in the inevitable reduction of human population…
If it didn’t exist, radical environmentalists would have to invent it.”
-Dave Foreman

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Foreman


"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation"

Prince Philip

- Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA)

August, 1988

american_almanac.tripod.com/cull.htm




There are many more quotes and info but for the sake of your attention span I will post more info later.  Oh yeah....one more thing. Google search the term Eugenics.

Check out transhumanism too.

Posted in these Groups: News, Politics
Topics: Obama, war, crisis, False Flag, media, Terrorism, CIA, mccain, New World Order, brainwashed, dumbed down, abortion, population control, eugenics
posted by Infowar on Monday, November 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 132 times
7 comments from 3 users

1

posted by lucy on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:22 AM

So can you give some examples (or even one) of the "FORCED ABORTION" programs you are talking about?

posted by ghostriter on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:26 AM

B. S.!

Talk about your slippery slope...oh, brother.

posted by Infowar on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:33 AM

Slippery slope?.....do the research. I doubt you will. Whether you want to research the info I put together or not, the fact remains...Obama supports forced abortions.

Even if he doesn't support a one child policy, continuing the funding for UNFPA is extremely questionable. Obama's wife supports partial birth abortion....need I say more? Sick.....

 

posted by Infowar on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:41 AM

The UNFPA promotes the one child policy & worse.

Here is an interesting article from the Cato institute (1999)

 

___________________________

 

Don't Fund UNFPA Population Control

by Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore is director of fiscal policy studies at the Cato Institute.

www.cato.org/pub_display.php

Stephen Moore is director of fiscal policy studies at the Cato Institute.

Added to cato.org on May 15, 1999

Washington Times on May 9, 1999.>

Within the next week or so Congress will vote on whether to restore $60 million of U.S. taxpayer funding over the next two years for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). For at least 30 years the UNFPA has been a complicit partner in some of the most unspeakably brutal population control programs around the globe -- including China's genocidal one-couple, one-child policy. Almost universally, women and children -- at least hundreds of thousands of them -- have been the victims of this fanatical crusade. The UNFPA should not be re-funded. It should be universally condemned for the evil acts in which it has participated.

These days almost no sane person gives any credence to the population bomb hysteria that was all the rage in the 1960s and 1970s. Every prediction of massive starvations, eco-catastrophes of biblical proportions and $100 a barrel oil has been discredited by the global economic and environmental progress of the past quarter century. Intellectually, the Malthusian limits to growth menace is stone dead.

But within the Clinton-Gore State Department, Malthusianism flourishes. The Clinton administration still allocates almost $300 million a year to international population control -- or what is euphemistically described these days as "family planning." In countries ranging from India to Mexico to Nigeria to Brazil, the basic human right of couples to control their own fertility and determine their own family size has been trampled upon by the state, thanks in larger part to flows of dollars and deluges of false limits-to-growth propaganda supplied by the American government.

The UNFPA, however, has had a particularly demon-like presence in developing nations. Back in the Reagan years, Congress sensibly pulled out of the UNFPA because of its complicity in some of the most inhumane forms of population containment. Today the UNFPA ludicrously maintains the fiction that the agency has fought coercive policies. How does one explain then, that UNFPA once gave an award to the Chinese government for the effectiveness of its genocidal one child per couple policy?

To this day no one knows precisely how many babies and women have died at the hands of the population control fanatics in China. What we do know is that this program will go down in history as one of the greatest abuses of human rights in the 20th century (see table). The Chinese government's birth control policy has already claimed an estimated 5-10 million victims. I say already because this is an ongoing genocide. An estimated 80-90 percent of the victims have been girls. UNFPA still spends millions each year on population control programs in China.

Incredibly the members of Congress leading the campaign to restore funding for the UNFPA tend to be "pro-choice" women -- principally Carolyn Maloney of New York, Cynthia McKinney of Georgia and Connie Morella of Maryland. But how in the world can an agency that participates in programs that sterilize women against their will or that tells women they have an ecological responsibility to have only one or at most two children possibly be called pro-choice? Last year the U.S. Senate Committee on Human Rights heard from witnesses of the China population program, who related how rural women are forcibly strapped to steel tables in "hospitals" and their babies aborted -- in some cases in the 7th, 8th and 9th months of pregnancy. Ms. Maloney may fantasize that the UNFPA promotes "reproductive rights," but there are quite literally millions of women in China, India and Mexico who would beg to differ.

These programs were never about giving women reproductive choice. Just the opposite. Population control programs have been from their inception about preventing couples from having "too many" babies. Moreover, these "family planning" services do not promote women's and children's health; they come at its expense. There are many Third World hospitals that lack bandages, needles and basic medicines but are filled to the brim with boxes of condoms -- stamped UNFPA or USAID.

Rep. Maloney believes that population control is necessary to "stop hunger and preserve our world's resources." In Maloney's dim world view, human beings are not resources. They are destroyers of resources. Yes, the spirit of Malthus is alive and well in the U.S. Congress.

A vote for the UNFPA is a vote for a fanatical anti-people creed that holds that we should celebrate the planting of a tree, or a litter of three baby seals, but that we should regard the birth of a human couple's third baby in China or India or even the United States as eco-terrorism. This is a fundamentally anti-Christian philosophy and it explains why groups like UNFPA, Zero Population Growth and Planned Parenthood view the Catholic Church as "the evil empire."

The cause of world hunger and environmental disasters in the world today is not too many people. It is too much statism. Almost all of the greatest ecological damage of the past 50 years was perpetrated by the socialists behind the iron curtain.

Reagan had it right when he declared 15 years ago that economic growth is "the best contraceptive." The UNFPA is at best irrelevant to economic development and probably a deterrent. To help women and children in the developing world, the United States should be exporting capitalism, not condoms.

posted by Infowar on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM

I like Cynthia McKinney.... it's a damn shame she supports the UNFPA.  

McKinney is anti-gun too.Sigh.....

She makes some great points against the war but she is way off on a few issues;

posted by Infowar on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:59 AM

Interesting commentary:

 

 

Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Defends Partial-birth Abortion


By Donna, published Oct 24, 2006

 Full article at the following link:

www.associatedcontent.com/article/77500/barack_hu ssein_obama_jr_defends_partialbirth.html


posted by Infowar on Nov 17, 2008 at 12:15 PM

To Lucy: The UNFPA funded China's one child policy program. So by continuing the funding to the UNFPA Obama by proxy supports the one child policy. Of course Obama's PR experts will spin it in his favor.

Look up ' Kemp-Kasten anti-coercion'

www.nrlc.org/Federal/ForeignAid/UNFPAresponse.htm l

 

One child policy = coercive-forced abortions

 

 

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement