|
TV Environmentalist Goes Nuts Over ClimateGate CNBC:The ‘Real’ Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed Forget The Emails, Code Discusses “Artificially Adjusted” Temperatures BBC Climate Correspondent Was Forwarded CRU Emails Five Weeks Before They Were Made Public Climate Alarmists Finally Admit The Debate Is Not Over New EU President Rompuy announces 2009 as “first year of global governance” London Guardian: Global body needed to direct green technology, G77 says Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud Implodes Couple Busted for Refusing to Pay Tip Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate! June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 "IF YOUR'E GOING TO PUT YOUR FAMILY IN A NURSING HOME... YOU BETTER VISIT THEM AT LEAST EVERY TWO DAYS, YOU BETTER LIVE NEAR THEM, YOU BETTER BRING THEM LUNCH, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND WATCH TV WITH THEM, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND RUB THERE FEET AND LOVE YOUR PARENTS (voice raises in anger) THAT WIPED YOUR BUTT, THAT TOOK CARE OF YOU, YOU SCUMBAG YUPPIES!!!"
"What a bunch of garbage, liberal, Democratic, conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" --Alex Jones We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries. Author: David Rockefeller, Source: Trilateral Commission meeting, June, 1991
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Neo-Cons Are Cheerleading For A Terrorist Who Helped Kill Hundreds Of U.S. Marines
The new “patriotism” - Phony conservatives throw their support behind Butcher of Beirut who directed bloody terror campaign against U.S.
The horrible irony to arise out of the riots and protests in Iran is that many Neo-Cons and phony conservatives, in their unified effort to enthusiastically embrace the Anglo-American establishment’s agenda for regime change, are cheerleading for a brutal thug who directed a terrorist campaign that killed hundreds of U.S. Marines in the 1980’s. This once again proves that slack-jawed Neo-Con twits, ditto-heads for phony conservative media whores like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, have no loyalty whatsoever to America, but only to the corrupt power structure which they like to believe they are a part of. Apparently, the new form of ‘patriotism’, the new incarnation of ’support the troops’ - is to support someone who helped massacre hundreds of U.S. troops just two decades ago. We are referring of course to Mir-Hossein Mousavi, the former Prime Minister of Iran who directed the bloody attacks on the U.S. embassy and Marine Corps barracks in Beirut in 1983. Sold by the media and hailed by Neo-Cons as the avatar of Iranian democracy, Mousavi was also “fingered Mousavi for the 1988 truck bombing of the U.S. Navy’s Fleet Center in Naples, Italy, that killed five persons, including the first Navy woman to die in a terrorist attack,” reports CQ Politics. Regarding the Beirut bombings, which killed 220 U.S. Marines, CIA Middle East field officer Bob Baer wrote in TIME Magazine that Mousavi, “Dealt directly with Imad Mughniyah,” who ran the Beirut terrorist campaign and was “the man largely held responsible for both attacks.” As Paul Craig Roberts writes, “The American media’s one-sided and propagandistic coverage of the Iranian election has made an American hero out of the defeated candidate, Mousavi.” This charade has been vigorously amplified by phony right-wingers. As Raw Story notes, Neo-Cons have sided with the opposition against the boogeyman Ahmedinajed, to the point of grunting with delight at scenes broadcast by Fox News of police being beaten to a pulp by rioters. This makes for an odd contrast to their usual sentiment, towards anti-war protesters in the U.S. for example, for whom their newly found concern about police brutality towards demonstrators goes out of the window. Similar feigned concern for demonstrators is being played out by TV talking heads across the networks. Take this former CIA agent for example, who informs Wolf Blitzer of his worries about how the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are treating protesters, warning that dissidents will be “disappeared”. Oh the irony! For it was the CIA that trained the brutal Savak security force, copying techniques used by the Nazis to train the Gestapo, following the CIA’s overthrow of the democratically elected Mosaddeq government in 1953. Savak engaged in the systematic torture, disappearance, and execution of thousands of the new puppet regime’s opponents before the 1979 revolution, all with the blessing of the United States government. Neo-Cons and establishment media figures have also seized upon the tragic death of “Neda” as another reason why regime change is needed, aghast at shocking scenes of an innocent women dying. This new found emotion at the sight of Middle Easterners bleeding to death on the streets was strangely absent during “shock and awe” and the eight year combined occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, during which hundreds of thousands have died in similar circumstances. In a Free Republic thread about possible CIA involvement in Iran - which is a proven fact and not even up for debate - “Freepers” express their desire to see a little more meddling by way of CIA support for the opposition and the demonstrators - presumably by way of more money for Al-Qaeda offshoot terrorist groups like Jundullah and Mujahedeen-e Khalq to carry out more bombings and kill more people as part of the CIA’s now public destabilization program in Iran. Of course, the talking heads, the establishment media whores, and the Neo-Con morons don’t really give a snap! about the protesters or the opposition in Iran and indeed probably want them to be beaten and suppressed so that their real cause can be advanced - the demonization of the current Iranian government in the eyes of the world and a greasing of the skids for military invasion on behalf of the U.S., Britain and Israel.
Paul Joseph Watson 6 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
girlsmom
on Jun 24, 2009 at 09:15 PM
one should really learn how to spell prior to making a public protest sign! ;o) posted by
motopoet
on Jun 24, 2009 at 09:19 PM
Um..You OBVIOUSLY don't listen to any of the hosts you mentioned. If you actually did, you would know that they aren't in the least, warm and fuzzy about Mousavi. For some of the reasons you mentioned AND that he was the biggest cheerleader for Iran's enriched nuclear material program. If you actually researched viable stories and stopped channeling, you would know that those hosts, like the vast majority of the Iranians protesting, just want change, and right now, they will take what they can get. It would also be useful to remember that those hosts, as well as the conservatives in general, are NOT in power in America. There is no secret army with flame throwers and tanks waiting in underground bunkers in Wyoming to take over Washington while everyone is focused on Iranian instability. The CIA doesn't answer to much of anyone, really, but they damned sure don't answer to Rush or Hannity. Also, what does what is happening in Iran have to do with the patriotism of conservative talk show hosts? I say that Obama, who is ready to send a "strong message"(what BALLS, huh?)to Iran, rather than offer to help further the cause of democracy as JFK promised the world we would do, is the one liberal patriots should be harassing. Maybe HE understands that Mousavi is just another Jihadist, just operating with a different stance, but ultimately, the same goals. NAW...Obama is just in over his head..AGAIN
posted by
motopoet
on Jun 24, 2009 at 09:21 PM
The Butcher of Beiruit? Didn't Arnie play him in a movie once?..OH..That was the Butcher of Bakersfield...nevermind. posted by
Infowar
on Jun 25, 2009 at 07:25 AM
yeah run a spell speck before you go through all of the trouble to make a sign. Most likely the guy holding the 'moran' sign is a Hannity fan. Those folks have a proven track record for being certified morons. posted by
NancyII
on Jun 25, 2009 at 07:33 AM
Sweeping generalizations with no real basis...again. Sure, base your opinion so all conservatives on a sign holding "moran" Considering your penchant for conspiracy theories this one holds about as much water as my spaghetti strainer. posted by
wndrwoman27
on Jun 25, 2009 at 09:36 AM
LOL Nancy...I totally agree with you. But don't you know if one person who claims to be a conservative does it, that means we all do it? And Democrats are moral and don't make generalizations?
1
Advertisement |