|
CNBC:The ‘Real’ Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed Forget The Emails, Code Discusses “Artificially Adjusted” Temperatures BBC Climate Correspondent Was Forwarded CRU Emails Five Weeks Before They Were Made Public Climate Alarmists Finally Admit The Debate Is Not Over New EU President Rompuy announces 2009 as “first year of global governance” London Guardian: Global body needed to direct green technology, G77 says Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud Implodes Couple Busted for Refusing to Pay Tip Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate! ANOTHER BLOW TO THE MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING RELIGION June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 "IF YOUR'E GOING TO PUT YOUR FAMILY IN A NURSING HOME... YOU BETTER VISIT THEM AT LEAST EVERY TWO DAYS, YOU BETTER LIVE NEAR THEM, YOU BETTER BRING THEM LUNCH, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND WATCH TV WITH THEM, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND RUB THERE FEET AND LOVE YOUR PARENTS (voice raises in anger) THAT WIPED YOUR BUTT, THAT TOOK CARE OF YOU, YOU SCUMBAG YUPPIES!!!"
"What a bunch of garbage, liberal, Democratic, conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" --Alex Jones We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries. Author: David Rockefeller, Source: Trilateral Commission meeting, June, 1991
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Feds Prepare To Tax Toilet Paper In Name Of Climate Change
The government wants to shake us down for our visits to the lavatory
The vampiric and gluttonous feeding frenzy currently being enjoyed by the federal government under the pretext of climate change is set to be expanded with a range of new taxes on products disposed of via waste water, including cosmetics, toothpaste and toilet paper. The “Water Protection and Reinvestment Act,” H.R.3202, introduced last week by Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore), will be “financed broadly by small fees on such things as bottled beverages, products disposed of in wastewater, corporate profits, and the pharmaceutical industry,” according to Blumenauer’s fact sheet. Though the taxes are “designed to be collected at the manufacturer level,” only the most naive would doubt that multinational corporations would just pass the cost on to the consumer in the form of higher prices, as is routine. Items disposed of in wastewater, such as toothpaste, cosmetics, toilet paper and cooking oil will be subject to a 3% excise tax, while water beverages will be hit with a 4% tax, “because these products wind up in the water stream and require clean up by sewage treatment plants,” according to the bill. The legislation also cites “climate change mitigation” as a justification for imposing the taxes. The Feds’ new feeding frenzy will rake in around $10 billion dollars a year. The bill even defines “toilet tissue” in section 4172. “The rulemaking to define what rises to the level of a bottom-wipe is in the name of a good cause: to tax the stuff,” writes Chris Horner. “The current band of feds don’t think you’ve paid enough tax — this has been established ad nauseam — and now want a dedicated revenue, er, stream, to pay to replace corroded pipes and overburdened sewer systems nationwide.” The necessity of cleaning up a water supply poisoned with the toxic soup of human disposals seems like a reasonable proposal, especially in light of evidence that antiandrogens in our rivers and lakes are contributing to global sperm reduction and essentially chemically sterilizing men, and yet when the filters are ready to be installed at water treatment facilities that would remove this junk, the government steps in and blocks them under the justification that they contribute to CO2 emissions. The fact that the global warming feeding frenzy has now reached a level of insanity to the point where the federal government is essentially preparing to tax us to defecate and urinate shows how far down the line we really are. What’s next? A tax on breathing? After all, we humans exhale that evil life-giving poisonous gas carbon dioxide. The New York Times actually introduced the idea of the government imposing a tax on breathing in a March 2007 editorial. As we are lectured about the necessity of why we must have every aspect of our lives regulated and taxed in order to save the earth, we learn that the government’s last efforts to do so, during the ozone layer scare of the 80’s and 90’s, actually harmed the environment. The Washington Post reported on Monday that hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), introduced in the 90’s to replace ozone-depleting gases in deodorants, fridges and air conditioners, actually “act like “super” greenhouse gases, with a heat-trapping power that can be 4,470 times that of carbon dioxide.” So while the government was brow-beating us about the evils of emitting CO2 because it apparently caused global warming, they were actually mandating that we use a gas which contributed to global warming to an substantially greater degree. Paul Joseph Watson www.prisonplanet.com/feds-prepare-to-tax-toilet-p aper-in-name-of-climate-change.html
8 comments from 6 users
1
posted by
witterpitters
on Jul 21, 2009 at 06:01 PM
posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 21, 2009 at 06:44 PM
Info: This is hilarious. And my question would be how this article will be taxed. Would it be a use tax? I'd suggest we start growing corn in a hurry. Then we can just use corn cobs. And why not build our own outhouses? Oh, I know -- too many emissions, too much air pollution, etc. But then honey wagons would come back into being, and a whole new job force could be created. Nothing surprises me anymore. Well, almost nothing. posted by
Lingtaowoo
on Jul 21, 2009 at 06:51 PM
posted by
UncleToad
on Jul 21, 2009 at 06:53 PM
Yes, we must fight this. The only way to save our sewer systems is to privatize them, and return them to the hands of responisble patriots! DOWN WITH THE SOCIALIST WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM! IT IS ROBBING US OF OUR& nbsp;VITAL ESSENCE! posted by
Infowar
on Jul 21, 2009 at 07:31 PM
I don't think this is funny, I mean it could be.....but it's not. How much more are we going to take? posted by
Infowar
on Jul 21, 2009 at 07:34 PM
posted by
paxchristi3
on Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41 PM
Good thing Americans are waking up to smell the toilet paper, and not a moment too soon. We just may end up kicking the liberals' harebrained cap-and-trade hustle to the curb and down the drain if the polls are any indication: http://www.wnd.com/index.ph... posted by
Infowar
on Jul 21, 2009 at 08:59 PM
Pax are you not aware of how many so called conservatives (Neo-Cons) are helping to bring this country down?
1
Advertisement |