|
ANOTHER BLOW TO THE MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING RELIGION Fed Sicks Attack Dogs On Ron Paul After Audit Amendment Passes CNN Propaganda Segment on Oath Keepers Demonizes Fall of the Republic With Hurricanes At Thirty Year Low, Gore Turns To Photoshop Another Example Of How Our Country Is Sinking Into The Depths Of Serfdom(wait until happens here) Listen to the Alex Jones Radio Show (Live Now) Tune in Purging The Undesirables: ADL Attempts To Pin A Yellow Star On Grass Roots America Bill O’Reilly: “I Don’t Care About The Constitution” Illegal Alien Amnesty Thugs Attack Tea Party Protesters in Ft. Lauderdale Gore’s presentation on climate change draws 800 as 200 protestors gather outside June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 "IF YOUR'E GOING TO PUT YOUR FAMILY IN A NURSING HOME... YOU BETTER VISIT THEM AT LEAST EVERY TWO DAYS, YOU BETTER LIVE NEAR THEM, YOU BETTER BRING THEM LUNCH, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND WATCH TV WITH THEM, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND RUB THERE FEET AND LOVE YOUR PARENTS (voice raises in anger) THAT WIPED YOUR BUTT, THAT TOOK CARE OF YOU, YOU SCUMBAG YUPPIES!!!"
"What a bunch of garbage, liberal, Democratic, conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" --Alex Jones We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries. Author: David Rockefeller, Source: Trilateral Commission meeting, June, 1991
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Obama's Science Czar Said Infants Are Not Human Beings
The infamous Holdren quotes from the 1977 ‘Ecoscience’ textbook, proposing forced sterilizations and other draconian measures to bring about mass death, are no incidental exercises in academic frivolity. In the 1973 publication ‘Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions’, co-authored by his old buddies, the Ehrlichs, Holdren wrote quite candidly about his basic view on human life, providing us with a peek at the decaying undergrowth out of which the Ecoscience document has emerged, proposing among other things a ‘planetary regime’ to assume command of matters of life and death. In chapter 8 of the ‘Human Ecology’-document, page 235, Holdren gives us his definition of human life: “The fetus“, Holdren writes, “given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being.” In other words, Holdren argues that people during the early years after birth, cannot yet be defined as human beings. Given this presumption by Obama’s science advisor, it may not come as a surprise that he does not shy away from coercive abortion policies or other such measures to scale back the population. After all, if an infant cannot be construed as being a human being, as Holdren argues, God-given rights do not apply to them nor does constitutional protection- and therefore they can be deemed as completely at the government’s mercy. Just like in Ecoscience, Holdren and the demonic duo, the Ehrlichs, present the case for involuntary fertility control in the Human Ecology monstrosity: “Several coercive proposals deserve discussion mainly because societies may ultimately have to resort to them unless trends in birth rates are rapidly reversed by other means.” Although the authors deem “compulsory control of family size” as being “unpalatable”, they nevertheless prefer it to other methods: “(…) the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1970s, we may well find them demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to begin now with milder methods of influencing family size preferences, while ensuring that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly perhaps the need for involuntary or repressive measures can be averted.” One has to wear ear pads the size of Texas Choice grapefruits to miss the threatening implications of these words. Just as Holdren’s comments have not been penned down in a vacuum, Holdren himself does not stand alone in his chilling stance. There is an entire subgroup within the scientific community consisting of a neo-Malthusian cast of characters, filling all kinds of official functions in public and private life. But when one of these demons (with a rap sheet listing numerous examples of an abject disregard for human life) occupies a key position within the government there should be some consequence- preferably a dethronement followed by an unequivocal denouncement on the part of the President. Out of which sublevel place do these rats come crawling up onto the surface of respectability? The answer: a very unwholesome place indeed, with a lineage that can be traced straight back to the Rockefeller-funded eugenics and- family planning apparatus, set in motion many decades before. The fact that the writings of John P. Holdren and company haven’t generated the massive outrage they deserve is an outrage in its own right. Taking into account that the author is Obama’s chief science advisor, serious thought should be given to legal steps against Mr. Holdren- effectively resulting in the removal of this individual from his current position and exposing the neo-Malthusian tendency to worm their way into both the scientific and political establishments. Sources:
http://www.questia.com/PM.q... http://www.cnsnews.com/publ...
Jurriaan Maessen www.prisonplanet.com/holdren-infants-not-human-be ings.html
8 comments from 8 users
1
posted by
savvydude
on Aug 8, 2009 at 12:28 AM
Hardly a surprise. Obama himself is avidly hostile towards the unborn. Lest we forget, he voted, while serving in the Illinois state house, to deny emergency care for any baby who might survive an abortion. Then his first act after being swore in as President was to reverse President Bush's executive order that banned the use of federal funds for abortions for persons in foreign countries. So, if you are pro-life, Obama doesn't care. And if you are yet born, he's got it in for you. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Aug 8, 2009 at 07:09 AM
hes starting at the root of the evil...systematic destruction of the young and elderly..making room for the ones he deems are deserved to walk this earth alongside him and his lovely wife (??) Michelle.. however he forgets one thing..he too shall be old someday..then what? oops thats right..if your a politician your granted life love and the pursuit of happiness..not too mention a great health care plan..if theres not something shady going on why cant we just join theirs.. posted by
violet
on Aug 8, 2009 at 07:43 AM
And you forgot to mention the other sly piece of legislation the Obama administration will be introducing. He and his "science" advisors are introducing a new renewable food source called Soylent Green. Don't believe me. Do your own research. posted by
ALICEN
on Aug 8, 2009 at 10:00 AM
sioux: please don't ask me for a link (I know you won't), but I believe Holdren also expressed the opinion that babies up to two years old aren't really people because they aren't completely formed -- or words to that effect. In other words, a two-year-old is quite expendable. Who needs it??? It's just too bad his mama didn't feel the same way. That's my opinion. posted by
UncleToad
on Aug 8, 2009 at 12:44 PM
See, linking to a document you have to pay for? Hmmmm. I think he's getting kickbacks from Questia, and then collecting on the people who don't then man up and read the context he's extracting it from. Let me give you a clue: Sociology, not biology. So, once again, the tools at PrisonPlanet take an exerpt, apply some fear-spin, and make it into what they want to say. At least this guy isn't citing himself. That makes him a fearmonger, rather than a moron. posted by
Ppopgun
on Aug 8, 2009 at 03:46 PM
Wonder how those internment camps are coming along. I understand those who are against abortion and challenge ideologues like Holdren might find themselves recipients of government-
posted by
FloridaStateGrad
on Aug 9, 2009 at 08:22 AM
posted by
DumbGuy
on Aug 9, 2009 at 06:36 PM
I guess it depends on how a person defines "human beings." Was Terri Schiavo a human being when she had no brain activity? I'd say no. Are infants human beings? Sure. They've got sufficient brain activity. But not as much as dogs do. http://www.newser.com/story... By the way, I hate dogs. And infants.
1
Advertisement |