You must sign in to take advantage of that feature. Enter your user name and password below. No user ID yet? Get one for free.
|
Wind, Valley and Driver Road. Won't you be my Neighbor(hood Development)? Concrete Crush Again Concrete Crush Evacuation plan - some maps County budget report - Q1 2009-2010 budget Isabella Dam evacuation plan Supervising growth plans. Health Agency - will supes bless merger? Supes morning. July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Sign up to get a downloadable, printable magazine of this blog with the Quirks of Kern Printcast.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Concrete Crush Again
We're on at the board of Supervisors. Kern County Planning Department chief Jim Ellis is delivering the staff report on the M&B Land Development concrete-crushing project. Both the businessman who proposed the project - Mark Polhamus - and neighbors have appealed the decision of the Kern County Planning Commission to approve a two-year use permit with a re-review of the project after that time. Neighbors don't want the project approved at all. Polhamus wants more than two years to operate this add-on to his flat-bed truck rental business.
17 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 02:30 PM
A couple of interesting twists — conditions of approval that would limit truck trips and limit the amount of material that could be delivered to the site. Ellis is also noting one of the big rubs for both sides in this dispute - that development in the area in the last 10 to 20 years have put industrial zoning on Rosedale Lane cheek by jowl to surrounding residential development.\
posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 02:33 PM
Ellis said the use, for the zoning, is "pretty benign." There are much worse uses that could be approved there. posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 02:37 PM
McQuiston is laying out the ground rules. Both appealants will be allowed to state their case. Then public comment. Then rebuttal from the two appelants. Roger McIntosh is speaking for M&B. He's making the point that the industrial zone has been in the area for decades. The homes are new. City and county officials justified allowing homes in the area becaus there were buffers between them and the potential industrial groups - railroad tracks run along Santa Fe Way to the west and the Mosquito and Vector Control District has it's airfield to the east. posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 02:42 PM
McIntosh is saying its not economically feasible to put the project in only to risk losing the right to operate the crusher onsite two years later.
posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 02:46 PM
Curtis Pierce, speaking for the neighbors, is up. Recycling is good...but not for their neighborhood. You find yourself in a position to fix a situation that never should have happened. This was an industrial area. Homes should have never been allowed to be built here," Pierce said. posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Catherine Jones is speaking. She's arguing that controls on the type of concrete Polhamus will be allowed to crush need to be stronger and that without sample testing there is no way to assure substances like asbestos aren't pulverised and pushed up into the air. posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:06 PM
Carol Bender is speaking. "Quite simply put it's too close to neighborhoods," she said in summarizing the case of the neighbors.
posted by
airqualityguy
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:10 PM
Catherine Jones should have brought up the coal ash often used in concrete contains many heavy metals like mercury. County staff should be aware of that because of the pending Calash application. It is usually considered ok because concrete is so stable. But, not when it is crushed! posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:15 PM
There were a lot of passionate arguements against the project - air quality, noise, traffic, zoning. Now we have people speaking in support of the project. Cathy Merlo - a resident is speaking in support of the staff recommendation. Of course she suggested the two year provisional permit during public comments at the Plan Comm meeting.... posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:17 PM
posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:21 PM
McIntosh agreed to ban all coated feed stocks on the project and staff immediately recommended a condition to implement that suggestion. Watson is up. posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:26 PM
"Our responsibility is to make sure we protect public health and safety," Watson said. But they also have to protect property rights. He's saying that federal air quality standards must be me if the project is approved before the air control district or the project doesn't open. posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:39 PM
"My thought is that the applicant has the right to do most of what he wants to do without a conditional use permit," Watson said. "At this point I am not willing to support it." He's asking if the applicant wants to respond. McIntosh jumped up. Watson said he'd like to limit the number of days the crushing plant was in operation. Oviatt is saying staff can't make findings to support that idea. Watson is pushing for a continuence to increase the amount of material that can be crushed in one day so the number of days the crushing can go on may be reduced. posted by
Barneyman
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Our "zoning" sucks. Why this conflict in uses was every allowed is a mystery or is it just good political planning by the Board? posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:53 PM
Rubio will support Watson's recommendation. Maggard said he doesn't think there is a win-win in this situation. He said the decisions that have put this zoning conflict in place are responsible for that. The stink of those decisions stick to both the city and county, he said. Planning chief Lorelei Oviatt said staff are hoping to fix some of the glaring zoning conflicts in the community through the General Plan update process. posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 03:56 PM
posted by
Jburger
on Nov 3, 2009 at 04:09 PM
1
Advertisement |