Crocodiles
Training crocodiles

A blog about Business & Finance, Family & Home, and Politics.
About Malcolmkyle


Real Name:
malcolm kyle
Gender:
male
Member Since:
September 07, 2006
Last Signed In:
June 17, 2009
Profile Views:
4911
Blog Views:
12787
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
My favorite church wins out against the Feds
The Colombianization of Africa
Latin America finaly says ENOUGH! and calls for an end to U.S. prohibition policies
Three major British Colombia newspapers call for Canada to consider legalizing drugs.
One Cop To Another: Don't Arrest Phelps for Bong Photo
More than 70% say drug war is a waste of taxpayer dollars
UN admits that drug money was used to keep the banks afloat.
For the full-blown money squandering, idiotic socialists amongst us
Who was Nimrod?
Yes; the party is well & truly over!
Archives
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
December 09
January 10
February 10
March 10
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


Malcolmkyle - > Crocodiles -> Three major British Colombia newspapers call for Canada to consider legalizing drugs.
Three major British Colombia newspapers call for Canada to consider legalizing drugs.

 In the past few days three major British Colombia newspapers have called for Canada to consider legalizing drugs.

The Province published an editorial Sunday "Legalization Needs Study". The editorial starts by plainly stating "This newspaper has traditionally opposed the legalization of drugs, and then goes on to say that now is time to debate the issue.

Then Monday the Victoria Times-Colonist published an editorial "Gun Epidemic Prescriptions" which ends stating:

"And it is time to recognize that gangs and guns are linked inextricably to the huge profits in the drug trade. Those profits are possible because of a failed, prohibition-based drug strategy. It's time to begin legalizing and controlling distribution as part of an entirely new approach to reducing the damage done by guns."

And Ian Mulgrew, Vancouver Sun columnist, addressed the same topic Monday with Time for Answers on Gang Violence.

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by Malcolmkyle on Wednesday, February 11, 2009 at 09:58 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 87 times
16 comments from 7 users

1

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Feb 11, 2009 at 02:44 PM

It sounded to me like an editorial in the Californian today was calling for a change in marijuana laws too. I was shocked.

 

There was also a story about 2 people that were robbed of their weed at gunpoint and were arrested after that. I guess it's not only a crime to be in possession of pot, but it's a crime to have it stolen from you as well.

posted by CurtDalton on Feb 11, 2009 at 02:53 PM

"...gangs and guns are linked inextricably to the huge profits in the drug trade."

Funny, I always thought it was people buying the drugs!   The real problem is the pseudo-acceptability of drug use portrayed by the media and gangsta rap (I refuse to call it music).

For the past thirty years, Hollywood has portrayed drug use as a harmless lifestyle. Actors, actresses and recording artists celebrate the use of drugs.    Gee, and we wonder why drug use hasn't declined?

PUT THE STIGMA BACK INTO DRUG USE AND STOP GLORFYING (AND PROMOTING)&nbs p; DRUG USE IN THE MEDIA AND YOU WILL SEE A PROPORTIONAL DECREASE IN DRUG USE.  

There's a reason businesses advertise their product - It works.  The media's glorification of drug use is nothing more than free advertisment for the drug cartels.

Without the record labels and Hollywoods cooperation any attempt to reign in drug use will ultimately fail.

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Feb 11, 2009 at 04:18 PM

Wow Curt, I had no idea you were an expert on Gangsta Rap?

You'd be surprised at how much old music they sample in some of those songs. 

 

What I think you fail to understand is that (some) music and movies are a by-product of drug use, not the reason people use them. I guess it is easier to blame the arts rather than just admit some people like to alter their minds.

posted by VirgilAnderson on Feb 11, 2009 at 04:25 PM

 

Curt is a Libertarian. 

He'll tell you so.  Just ask him.

--virgil

posted by NancyII on Feb 11, 2009 at 04:27 PM

Thanks Curt...good post.

posted by sagefever on Feb 11, 2009 at 04:38 PM

Wonder how Curt's theory fits in with that bit in the paper showing use going down among young people?

There are just as many movies that show the ill effects of drug use, as those that "glorify it". Look at actors like Robert Downy Jr. who were a mess,then cleaned up and really hit their stride as actors....that sends a message to those so inclined to listen.

Personally I follow my own moral compass~ so far so good. And I love me some arts.

 

posted by AudreyB on Feb 11, 2009 at 04:48 PM

I must have missed the scenes in the movies I watched which showed drugs being glorified.

FYI Curt  Hollywood has also does some darn fine movies detailing the horrors of drug and alcohol abuse.  To wit:

Clean and Sober

The Basketball Diaries

Less Than Zero

Traffic

Leaving Las Vegas

Lady Sings The  Blues

My Name is Bill W

Days of Wine and Roses

Postcards From the Edge

These are just a few of dozens of films detailing wrecked and lost lives due to drug abuse.

posted by Malcolmkyle on Feb 13, 2009 at 08:52 AM

 

 

Curtdalton; It's disappointing to see that you don't bother to ask yourself  how today's prohibition is similar to the original prohibition with alcohol, which not only led to a rise in the consumption of alcohol, but also mirrored the violence, gang activity, deadly bath-tub tainted concoctions, and the corruption of law enforcement that we are now witnessing with the prohibition of these other drugs. 

Alcohol prohibition's only achievement was to escalate undesirable consequences and now the sequel is even worse, except this time it's on an international scale.  

Please join us Curt, in calling for credible drug law reform that will help cut the main funding to gangs and terrorists thus adding stability safety and making it possible to utilize the additional tax money for the good of all of us.

 

posted by NancyII on Feb 13, 2009 at 09:18 PM

Here's a song for ya.  Enjoy....

 

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

 

 

posted by VirgilAnderson on Feb 13, 2009 at 09:43 PM

 

Here's a better one for ya ... it says more, I think.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

--virgil

posted by Malcolmkyle on Feb 15, 2009 at 08:02 AM

 

 

Nancy; if only I knew you had broad band, then I would have shown you this weeks ago:

                                 http://www.youtube.com/watc...

We have reached the point in our society where our reactions to drug use have become even more irrational and immature than the behaviors of the drug users themselves. It's time for all of us to grow up and quit intruding on and destroying the private lives of our citizens.

 

posted by NancyII on Feb 15, 2009 at 08:14 AM

I disagree completey Malcom (no surprise I know).  I believe people are finally becoming educated on the devastating effects of drug use and abuse as well as addiction.  Drug addiction benefits no one.

While you may feel people have a right to sit quietly in their homes and get loaded, it rarely stays there.  Sure there are some who don't affect the outside world but, for the most part, it greatly affects everyone.

Mind and mood altering drug use is not an isolated experience.

posted by Malcolmkyle on Feb 15, 2009 at 08:44 AM

 

Nancy;  most thinking people are finally becoming educated on the devastating effects of locking their neighbors up in cages just for using the 'wrong' plants.

Do you honestly  feel, you have the right to sit quietly at home, drinking Martinis while deciding what other people should be able to do with their own bodies? You ruin the lives of otherwise honest folk, just because they won't comply with your cultural bias. And I agree; it does indeed rarely stay there Nancy; if you'd have taken the time to follow the link, then you would have learned that at least 10 million Americans -thr greatest percentage of which are Afro Americans- are no longer able to participate in the economy, and this alone, is more than enough to seriously impact the economy.

American Drug War-Last White Hope Part 1 of 12

 You simply cannot have drug prohibition without the consequences that come with it.

American Drug War-Last White Hope Part 2 of 12

 

 

 

 

posted by Malcolmkyle on Feb 15, 2009 at 05:16 PM

 

Nancy; Thank you; for all the times you've been gracious enough to lock horns with me!

            God bless and may life be gentle

 

posted by VirgilAnderson on Feb 15, 2009 at 06:51 PM

 

"Mind and mood altering drug use is not an isolated experience"

 

Neither is putting a person who smokes marijuana or uses cocaine into jail.

Which  is better: working with chemical dependency as it occurs or throwing those afflicted with that condition into jail?

--virgil

posted by Malcolmkyle on Feb 16, 2009 at 05:33 AM

 

Thank you too Virgil for all your contributions!

 

There are two competing sets of harms relative to the drug problem. The damage that a drug user does to himself, and the extra harm the policy of prohibition does. A hardened meth, alcohol or crack addict, generally, not only ruins his own life, but also that of his close family. Now, that's never been in dispute here. But the prohibitionist approach to drugs carries an extra set of harms, which duly affects us all, and is now totally priced beyond our means. 

Approximately 2.4 million people are currently incarcerated; roughly 20 percent of state prisoners and 50 percent of federal prisoners, are doing time for a drug offense.  775,000 people were arrested for marijuana possession last year alone. The estimated cost of incarcerating these drug offenders is $15 billion annually. So yes; addiction destroys lives and families, but prison adds to this misery, particularly long, mandatory-minimum sentences for minor offenses that are a direct consequence of political demagoguery rather than sane policy. 

It costs $25,000 yearly in tax money to house a drug offender. This would provide three addicts with substance abuse treatment. A Rand Corp. study in 1994 found that $7 in societal costs were saved for every dollar invested in treatment. So where would you rather your hard earned money be spent? 

Meanwhile, drugs of all varieties are still cheap and plentiful, and the basic economics of drug dealing remain: Take one dealer off the street, and another takes his place. Something that simply doesn't happen for other more real crimes, such as murder, embezzlement or burglary. 

Historically, the prohibition of any mind altering substance has never succeeded in providing what is needed, which is a safer environment for the addict, the family and society at large. It always has, and always will, spawn far worse conditions than those it claims to be able to alleviate.

Maybe it's time to try something that works again.  

 

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement