A blog about Business & Finance.
About MoneyTalks


Member Since:
January 29, 2008
Last Signed In:
September 04, 2008
Profile Views:
1002
Blog Views:
46944
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Sheep may safely graze?
Veterans, Boomers, Xers and Yers at work
Lender gambled trust...literally
Winning MEGA Millions ticket still unclaimed, Lotto says
Bringing business to Kern ...
How low will prices go? Check out our latest home sales map
Housing: What you're paying, right now
People in Business: A who's who for Aug. 29
58 homes! Check out our home sales map
People in Business: A who's who for Aug. 22
Archives
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
The team

Contact us with your news and information:

Team leader:

Christine Peterson, cpeterson@bakersfield.com, 395-7418

Assistant team leader:

John Cox, jcox@bakersfield.com, 395- 7345

Reporters:

Courtenay Edelhart, cedelhart@bakersfield.com, 395-7372

Jenny Shearer, jshearer@bakersfield.com, 395-7234

Gretchen Wenner, gwenner@bakersfield.com, 395-7368

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


MoneyTalks - > Money Talks -> Windows Vista vs. Windows XP
Windows Vista vs. Windows XP

In a bid to nudge reluctant consumers over to Vista, Microsoft Corp. has announced it is taking Windows XP off store shelves.

Have you used both operating systems?  What do you think of them?

Reporter Courtenay Edelhart would like to talk to you if you have strong opinions one way or the other. (661) 395-7372.

--Courtenay Edelhart

Posted in the Business & Finance interest group.
Topics: computers, software
posted by MoneyTalks on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 at 02:19 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 171 times
18 comments from 15 users

1

posted by pedigo328 on Jul 2, 2008 at 02:53 PM

Vista is nice, with the exception of having to buy a higher performance machine to run it then that of XP. They both definitely have their quirks though.


posted by johnburnssucks on Jul 2, 2008 at 03:06 PM

From what several people have told me, Vista isn't that much better than XP to make it worth the extra money. Some people have to have the latest in everything no matter what, some don't.

posted by TSM on Jul 2, 2008 at 03:17 PM

 

MS may be removing XP from store shelves, but Dell and other the major computer makers are still providing it upon request.

The federal government has refused MS' request to have their new computer purchases loaded with Vista and will continue to provide XP licenses.

I have a desktop with XP and a laptop with Vista. XP is much more stable and easier to use. Vista's only improvement is on multimedia tasks, it lags in everything else.

 

posted by randomfactor on Jul 2, 2008 at 03:26 PM

I won't give up XP until I absolutely have to.

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jul 2, 2008 at 03:44 PM

Neither one is good, but I have used XP quite a bit more. Vista is really only good if you have a new computer. My suggestion...Get a MAC and don't worry about viruses or malware or the "computer not responding" message. Their resale value (yes people really do buy used macs) makes up for the price difference.

 

 

posted by Jayh1 on Jul 2, 2008 at 05:13 PM

Vista isn't much of an improvement from XP, it certainly isn't worth the hundreds of dollars they charge you for it!

posted by Rickldo on Jul 2, 2008 at 05:17 PM

They'll take away my XP when they pry it from my cold dead hands! Vista STINKS! My office computer has Vista, my desk top at home has XP, I use both, but if I need something quickly, XP it is. I'll buy extra copies of XP. I hope the next "improvement" is exactly that...

posted by bakonative on Jul 2, 2008 at 05:26 PM

XP for me. I've heard of problems with programs on Vista

posted by AudreyB on Jul 2, 2008 at 05:58 PM

It's XP for me.

posted by witterpitters on Jul 2, 2008 at 08:04 PM

I have both! XP on my main home computer and VISTA on my lap top.  Honestly, I can't tell you the difference except the lap top goes with me - the other one is too big!!!!  

posted by bakonative on Jul 2, 2008 at 09:51 PM

Mr Lo, is it true Vista has problems with Adobe Acrobat? Not reader, but the actual acrobat. (which I have, and love)

posted by Shwaine on Jul 2, 2008 at 11:52 PM

Do we have to choose from XP or Vista? Because I'd opt for neither. I use Linux at home and at work. If Windows is absolutely needed, I fire up a VMWare virtual machine with either 2000 or XP.

posted by NancyII on Jul 3, 2008 at 06:39 AM

I have XP on my desktop, Vista on my new laptop.  Couldn't tell you the difference since I'm technoligcally challenged anyway.  As long as I can get to the internet and have a word processing program, I'm good to go.

The kids and I had a discussion last night about how far we've come and how different the operating systems are since my first.  It was a Commodore 64.  My second one didn't have Windows either and I used Basic and thought I was on a roll.  I could search for anything on my computer with just a few commands and could search in my checkbook book with less than more than keys.   It took 17 floppys (5 1/4) to back up my information.  If we'd stayed with that, I probably would have learned more but when Windows came along it became a relative no brainer.  And that worked for me.

posted by randomfactor on Jul 3, 2008 at 07:54 AM

Comedian on Bob&Tom just noted that someone upgraded Bill Gates from XP to Vista as a going-away "gag gift."

I had a C-64 too, with the cassette drive to store files.  Ah, the old days.

posted by TSM on Jul 3, 2008 at 08:59 AM

is it true Vista has problems with Adobe Acrobat? Not reader, but the actual acrobat.

There are some problems with Acrobat Standard version 6, and with the Standard and Professional versions of  7, but version 8 seems to be stable on Vista.  The problems I ran into with version 6 & 7 of Acrobat had to do with printing and rouge DLLs not removing themselves from the services after shutting down Acrobat. The DLLs would interfer with MS Word and OpenOffice, causing them to be unstable. The Reader versions don't seem to have any problems on Vista.

Make sure you get the latest (June 2008) patch for which ever version you're running (including the Reader version). There's a critical security issue that has been found in the wild it fixes.

My first computer was the MITS Altair 8800. You had to put it together yourself. My current desktop is an IBM AS400 mini-mainframe running an enterprise version of XP and Red Hat.

 

posted by sparkie1946 on Jul 4, 2008 at 06:52 AM

I have a Gateway running vista Home Premium.  The only software on it is a surveillance program called Geovision that monitors security cameras.  Vista will give me a blue screen every 2 to 3 days, shut down and restart.  Bottom line -- not happy with Vista.

posted by Phil42 on Jul 5, 2008 at 10:24 AM

I have both Vista Home Premium and XP Pro on the same computer but on different drives. After building this system I found that a lot of software I had would not run under Vista and some hardware was not compatible. I have a Canon camera with a USB interface that won’t work and also an ATI HDTV card. What is funny is all my old Microsoft software seem to work.

posted by sagefever on Jul 5, 2008 at 03:24 PM

I ran beta Vista,both 1 and 2. You need major GB and if your a business ~ its the way to go. Home users XP.

 

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: