Look, Listen, and Learn

A blog about Kern County, Politics, and Schools & Education.
About OjoReal


Member Since:
January 28, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 23, 2009
Profile Views:
413
Blog Views:
1372
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
"Straw Man" Propositions Defeated
Who Benefits From Federal Bailout? A Short Sad Story
Score One For Ann Barnett
TBC Recommends Candidate Early??
BCSD Can Meet In Auditorium
What's Up? The Reign of Terror By Gangs
Weir, Todd, Ross, Kapral, and....Turnipseed?
Is Ken Weir Representing the People of the Third Ward?
How Much Is A Billion Dollars? Check Your TAX BILL
Judge Bush For District Attorney
Archives
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


OjoReal - > Look, Listen, and Learn -> Score One For Ann Barnett
Score One For Ann Barnett

On July 3, TBC ran an article regarding Ann Barnett, Kern County Auditor-Controller in which it was pointed out that she stated that by ending civil marriage ceremonies, the county would save $18,000.  Later, it was determined by Ron Errea, CAO for the BoS, that figure was more like $171.  Regardless of where you stand on the issue of same-sex marriage, that's a whopping error of $17,829.  Ann Barnett took the heat for her personal stand as well as that "error."

In today's paper, on page B3 - the continuation of "Supervisors hash out budget plan" article - it states that Ann Barnett "discovered" an additional $3.2 million that had been "accidentally counted as an expense twice" in the budget.

This information brings a few questions to mind:  This year is unquestionably a lean one for the county budget and by necessity supervisors, the CAO, and the County Auditor-controller are going over it with a finetooth comb.  But what of the years fat with taxpayer dollars?  Any "accidental" double expenses sneak through then?

Who made the error?  $3,2 million is not cookie jar cash.  Shouldn't that person be reprmanded and encouraged to enroll in one of the new Algebra classes being mandated by the State School Board for all eighth grade students?

And finally.  Is anyone going to congratulate Ann Barnett for discovering the error?  Seems like regardless of her personal beliefs, she did save the BoS from making some very difficult cuts.

Posted in these Groups: News, Kern County
Topics: Kern County Budget, Algebra for All
posted by OjoReal on Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 213 times
37 comments from 16 users

1

posted by blognroll on Jul 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM

 Is anyone going to congratulate Ann Barnett for discovering the error? 

I hate to do it, but I must give credit where credit is due.  Congratulations! 

 

posted by TSM on Jul 24, 2008 at 12:37 PM

Is anyone going to congratulate Ann Barnett for discovering the error? 

It depends.

Was the error found in her department?

 

posted by s810 on Jul 24, 2008 at 12:56 PM

I don't think somebody really needs to be congratulated for doing their job. She is the auditor-controller.

This is the same mentality of tipping people at service counters.

Mr. Incredible had it right: "When are we going to stop rewarding mediocrity?".

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jul 24, 2008 at 01:24 PM

Congratulate her for spending more time talking to lawyers about how she can avoid portions of her elected duties than actually doing her job? I'm sorry, but Barnett has already cost the county too much money.

 

Step Down Ann Barnett, and let someone better suited for the job do it.

posted by OjoReal on Jul 24, 2008 at 01:38 PM

Actually, we ignore mediocrity; we reward incompetency.  How else can anyone reconcile the fact that Radio One CEO, Liggins was given a 70 percent raise ($980,000 annual base salary) AND a 5.8 million bonus for LEADING the company to a $387.1 million loss last year?

Perhaps I should not have used the word "congratulate."  But I do think that if people are not at least recognized for doing a good job, they will eventually say, "What the hay?" and settle for doing a mediocre one. 

posted by blognroll on Jul 24, 2008 at 01:41 PM

No, Ann, don't do it.  Don't give in to peer, oops, I mean ProgressivePete pressure.  You've done nothing wrong.  You were crucified for 3 consecutive days on the front page of the Bakersfield Californian.  Now, if that weren't punishment enough, they want you to lose your job. 

posted by antiextremism on Jul 24, 2008 at 02:45 PM

Well, we all fantasize about honest politicians Doc. Regardless of her job performance, or her personal beliefs, she ended civil marriages here not because of budgets, but because of her personal religious beliefs. I'd have more respect for her if she just yelled to the masses, "I'm not gonna marry gays!"

posted by siouxcityranch on Jul 24, 2008 at 02:58 PM

anti wrote:  "I'm not gonna marry gays!"

Like that wouldn't have been a law suit in the makings..she had to show diplomacy while achieving her means to and end..still don't see the big issue except people just like to B**ch and whine..

If me or mine ever went to the court house to get married it sure would show that marriage was on rocky ground from the start so why even do it?? A friends backyard ..a park or on a sandy beach would be better than that..complain complain thats all it is.,..

posted by randomfactor on Jul 24, 2008 at 02:59 PM

It would quite *PROPERLY* have spawned a lawsuit.  In order to advance bigotry without paying a personal price for it, she decided to inconvenience both gays and straights alike.

I swear, so many Christianist folks want to be martyrs but don't want to feel the arrows personally.

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jul 24, 2008 at 03:08 PM

BLT, do you know about her authorizing the purchase of $5 million dollars worth of uncertified voting machines that are now useless (not that they weren't useless before). She's done plenty wrong, and has cost the county millions. I understand as a fellow Christian, you feel obligated to stand up for her, but her poor job performance goes way beyond gay marriage. I am a little surprised that you would defend someone that is clearly lying. 

posted by randomfactor on Jul 24, 2008 at 03:11 PM

Field Poll, Prop 8 (the Hate Amendment) going down 51-42 at the moment.

http://field.com/fieldpollo...

Oddly enough, Catholics seem less bigoted on the issue than Protestants.  Even the Central Valley is only polling 5-4 in favor of hate.

 

posted by nooneisabovethelaw on Jul 24, 2008 at 03:23 PM

Yeah, it's kinda odd that her religion forbids her from performing marriage ceremonies but it's okay to lie about the reasons why she won't do marriage ceremonies anymore.

posted by antiextremism on Jul 24, 2008 at 03:25 PM

Probably true Sioux, but it's still a lie.

I don't see it as that big of an issue either, there are plenty of ways to get married. Unfortunately, even if you consider gay marriage as dirty water, she threw the baby out with it.

posted by Ray_Harwick on Jul 24, 2008 at 03:36 PM

I wonder what the people who attend her church have to say about having to drive to Tulare to get a marriage license. It was 30 bucks in Bakersfield. Hell, the gasoline expense alone for driving to Tulare would be in the neighborhood of an extra 8 to 10 bucks for the two gallons of gas needed for the trip, not to mention the wear and tear on the vehicle, and not to mention having to take off work to go if Tulare's county office is closed after 5:00 pm and not open on the weekend.  She's doing Kern County a favor?

In 10 years when Kern County is part of the LA metro, there will be 200K  people in Bakersfield alone. If you compare Bakesfield's growth with say, Fresno, which is a good comparison, you're looking at half a million people inside of 50 years. We can't just plan for today. We have to plan for the future of our children. This interruption of civil marriage services is like turning over the county to a Luddite who doesn't expect or want change.

posted by allRED on Jul 24, 2008 at 03:49 PM

H/M   they can get a marriage license here and get married here    But not @ her office       All they have to do is find a [edit.] Pastor that's out of the will of God

posted by randomfactor on Jul 24, 2008 at 03:59 PM

You know, Ron, you raise a valid point.  By eliminating all civil ceremonies, Barnett is forcing those of us with no need of any god to visit a minister (or a judge, if you can find one) in order to be married.  Wonder if there's a discrimination lawsuit in that...

posted by Maggiepoo on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:06 PM

Forceable religion contact...

 

sounds nasty---- and Catholic

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:15 PM

HM - last I checked, the Bakersfield population was above the 320K mark..

posted by antiextremism on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:25 PM

I'll bet that if you count the Greater Bakersfield area, and the illegals, Bakersfield has close to half a million

posted by allRED on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:33 PM

Let's see Random: You are not forced to go to a minister of God    you still have the Gay ministers of Satan they are licensed to perform [edit.] marriages  I see no discrimination    You wouldn't go to a man of God any way Buddy  so I don't see a suit here buddy   Freedom of Choice

posted by randomfactor on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35 PM

Oh, I'd much prefer a Satanist to someone who discriminates against homosexuals.

Your "god" would, too.

posted by allRED on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:38 PM

Then why you Bitching   go to Vegas they seem to take anyone   go to the corner of Baker street and Calif   they have pastors that will perform your 1st night @ the marriage bed

posted by Ray_Harwick on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:42 PM

Boy! It was only like yesterday that Bakersfield, proper, was about 100.000.  Must be the water.

Found this: Estimated population in July 2006: 308,392.  That was about the population of Fresno when I moved there in 1979. Now it's pushing 600K.

[Edit] As of 2008, Fresno has an estimated population of 501,525

posted by allRED on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:42 PM

I know alot of pastors in this town that will marry you for nothing   (if your a MAN and a Woman)

posted by Ray_Harwick on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:44 PM

How can you be a man AND a woman?

posted by randomfactor on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:53 PM

Why am I bitching?  Because the County Clerk of Kern County is a bigot, that's why. 

posted by allRED on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:55 PM

H/M: I have let you slide because you dont seem to be the pushy type    You are more the womenly type    Peter has a verse for you   seeing you have claimed to be a christian in your life

Like Dogs they return to their Vomit      In the Words of God    You are deceived  you are Blinded     I have read your post and I feel sorry for you   @ a point in your life you made the decision to turn from God you held off for years about being Gay but you gave in    On this net you sound so easy going and understanding you have come in as a Angel of Light but have Satan the false Angel of Light behind you     

[edit.]

posted by allRED on Jul 24, 2008 at 04:57 PM

NOW NOW Random she is only doing her JOB   she is saving us tax payers money Buddy

posted by learnem on Jul 24, 2008 at 05:12 PM

hey now ..i think everybody can agree that we can learn alot from history..

 

the downfall of the roman empire.......of the many things...what one current hot topic was among them??

 

anyone

anyone

progressive??

random?? (like you know god...pa...leeze)

posted by Ray_Harwick on Jul 24, 2008 at 06:10 PM

Who IS making that claim?

The thing about English is that when you look in the dictionary, you notice that for most words, it gives different definitions based on what is called the "sense" of the word. Another way of understanding "sense" is to instead use the concept of "context" of a word.  

So, since no one but you is referring to homosexuals in that old and hurtful "sense" of the "Q-word" except for you, what can you expect us to think of the sense of that word?  Do you mean it in the sense of "odd"?

Apparently not. Especially when you then direct comments toward the ONE homosexual participating in this discussion in the form of:

H/M: I have let you slide because you dont seem to be the pushy type    You are more the womenly type    Peter has a verse for you   seeing you have claimed to be a christian in your life

Like Dogs they return to their Vomit      In the Words of God    You are deceived  you are Blinded     I have read your post and I feel sorry for you   @ a point in your life you made the decision to turn from God you held off for years about being Gay but you gave in    On this net you sound so easy going and understanding you have come in as a Angel of Light but have Satan the false Angel of Light behind you     

 

You are using it in the sense of a noun, not as an adjective. It's a deliberate slur, Sir. You intend to always maintain at least a suggestion of negativity about homosexuals when you speak of them. By doing so, you just divert the whole discussion into something completely unrelated to the context it had when it began. Using the most modest amount of respect, you could avoid that.

posted by drilnliftcrude on Jul 24, 2008 at 07:58 PM

Ann Barnett continues to show she is a woman with principle.  Great going, Ann.  Should she choose to run, she will be re-elected overwhelmingly.  Maybe the Homosexual/lesbian/transgender/questionable/pedop hile/bestial/liberal/progressive/Californian editorial page lobby can field a gayley cross dressed opponent for her in the next election.  Then you can see just how wonderfully backward our county can be.

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jul 24, 2008 at 09:18 PM

A true woman of principle would have shown respect for the authority of her office.


posted by drilnliftcrude on Jul 24, 2008 at 09:28 PM

Run against her in the next election, FSG.

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jul 24, 2008 at 09:44 PM

drilnlift - what Ann Barnett lacks in respect for the office she holds, she makes up for in experience and understanding of her position itself.  I would not make a good candidate for her job, but I'll most definitely be supporting someone who does have both the experience and the character needed to fill such an office.

posted by antiextremism on Jul 25, 2008 at 09:54 AM

Since when is lying a measure of good principles?

posted by nooneisabovethelaw on Jul 25, 2008 at 10:28 AM

Learnem, the downfall of the Roman Empire coincides with a massive conversion to Christianity. A coincidence? You decide.

posted by jpatto on Jul 25, 2008 at 09:23 PM

Ann needs to be recalled!!!!! She was placed in her seat by the people... She needs to serve her seat for the people....Now she needs to leave her seat by the people to releave the people........We do not need anyone who takes a personal thought into their own hands and penalizes everyone!!!!!!!!!  She does not deserve our paycheck any longer.......Ann Barnett You SUCK!

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement