|
One you can Count on CHUCK BALDWIN FOR PRESIDENT Turning out the lights Campaign for Liberty Fireworks...Henry... Rubio...? SCREW OBAMA & McCAIN Gay 'Weir'd Thompson Wrong Choice January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Gay
So, Ms. Barnett has suspended all marriages. This is a bold move. I have wondered whether or not to support her decision. So? The fact of the matter is that Ms. Barnett reports to the people. She is an elected official. Just like Ken Weir must report to the people. I have been urging for the recall of Ken Weir, but I am not sure about recalling Ann Barnett just yet. Ms. Barnett can decide to do her job or not. The bottom line is that if it doesn't meet the expectations of the people (her boss), then she should be fired. Although she has been somewhat quiet on the issue, I feel that she should not be recalled. I support her decision. There are numerous other ways for couples to get married. The alternatives do not have to be more expensive, and in all reality they are not. However, if the people conclude that Ms. Barnett has not acted according to her 'contract' with the people, then she should be fired. If the people have a problem with her job performance then they need to get the recall going and let the people vote. That is one recall petition that I will not sign. SUPPORT ANN BARNETT 6 comments from 6 users
1
posted by
OldBlue56
on Jun 16, 2008 at 08:50 PM
posted by
TomW
on Jun 16, 2008 at 10:18 PM
Either she's lying about her motives or she's not very good at her job. Either way, I don't support her, but wouldn't support a recall either.
posted by
bakonative
on Jun 16, 2008 at 10:20 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jun 17, 2008 at 08:02 AM
If not, it'll be one more item to add to the list of reasons for removal. This whole thing was handled badly from the start. posted by
dutchlady
on Jun 17, 2008 at 08:07 AM
We are led to believe that Ms. Barnett uses her religious beliefs to not have marriages performed in city hall. And because she is silent on the issue, we truly don't know the truth. Which leads me to wonder, if this is about her Biblical belief system, then my Bible also states many things along these lines, such as "Thou shalt not lie" and to render unto Caesar (in other words, follow the law of the land.) So many people take Biblical concepts out of context and apply it to what they want to believe, or have us believe. With elected officials, this isn't to be. They are elected to represent all of us, including gays, the elderly, and anyone else alive and breathing in Kern County. Elected officials have taken it to mean that once elected, they then apply their own belief system to their voting on issues, and this begins at the very top in Washington. Sadly, it has now filtered down to Ms. Barnett. Regardless of her reasons, she was very communicative when wanting to be elected; she now hides behind her silence. Not acceptable for elected officials. posted by
lucy
on Jun 17, 2008 at 08:25 AM
She is getting paid to do her job. If I refused to do my job I would be fired.
1
Advertisement |