The Dirt
Polluted air, scarce water, dumping, sprawl. In The Dirt, reporter Stacey Shepard examines the numerous environmental problems facing Bakersfield and Kern County.

A blog about Business & Finance and Family & Home.
About TheDirt


Member Since:
January 22, 2008
Last Signed In:
September 02, 2008
Profile Views:
527
Blog Views:
5780
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Public workshops on Big West expansion
Who uses Amtrak?
Olympic venues and sustainability
Could you buy nothing new for a month? A year?
Move over monster trucks, smart car has arrived
New option in refinery expansion
Photos: Bike path beaver's back
Big West under scrutiny: Take II
Small ammonia leak at refinery Sunday
Cars damaged by tainted gas sold at 25 local stations
Archives
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


TheDirt - > The Dirt -> New option in refinery expansion
New option in refinery expansion

Controversy over the Big West refinery expansion has focused on one thing in recent weeks: which toxic chemical would be safest, modified HF or sulfuric acid.

But a revised environmental report out Friday contained a bit of a surprise.

How about neither?

The 3,000 page report examines a wide range of impacts on everything from wildlife to odors and traffic. But in a section called "alternatives" it also describes a process that would allow Big West to boost its diesel and gasoline output while allaying community concerns about hazardous chemicals.

The alternative appears to be a sound compromise that would allow the expansion to move forward while assuring the surrounding community there will be no new dangers from toxic chemicals.

Big West wasn't available to comment on the alternative Friday but said they will discuss it Monday.

You can read the section on alternatives by downloading the Refinery Alternatives PDF on this page. Scroll down a bit and it's on the left beneath the 'PDFs' heading.

Anyone think this option will get some traction? Or do you expect the issue to remain polarized between sulfuric acid and modified hydrofluoric acid?

Posted in the Business & Finance interest group.
Topics: environment
posted by TheDirt on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 07:30 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 137 times
5 comments from 5 users

1

posted by sagefever on Jun 28, 2008 at 08:14 AM

Compromise ,love that word. Alternative D sounds good to me~ they get to produce more gas,we get less danger and a more environmentally friendly neighbor.

 

posted by ibanezboogie2000 on Jul 1, 2008 at 05:46 AM

I don't think people are really understanding what exactly Alternative D is.... by using the equipment for Alternative D the amount of diesel is increased. NOT GAS.... diesel. So unless you have a fleet of trucks or cars that run on diesel, don't expect to be impacted by this new great "compromise".

And less danger? Seriously there are more dangerous chemicals than MHF acid used daily in that refinery. Also given the pressures and temperatures that most the equipment runs at you are at greater risk of a catastrophic explosion than a chemical release. You just never knew about it.

posted by Shwaine on Jul 1, 2008 at 11:55 AM

You know, forget Alternative D for a moment. Why don't we focus on this statement by the refinery:

"Refinery officials have said that equipment needed for the original proposal has already been ordered, so the company could take a financial hit." www.bakersfield.com/hourly_news/story/482620.html

WTH? They've already gone and purchased equipment for their preferred expansion plan before it's even been approved by the city? What sort of hubris (or corruption) is this to assume the city is just going to roll over and go along with their plans? And now we're supposed to go along with it because they've had the hubris to already order the equipment? Flying J can take a flying leap IMO. If it were up to me, I'd stick them with Alternative D just to punish them for having the audacity to order equipment before their proposal had been approved.

posted by Maggiepoo on Jul 1, 2008 at 12:02 PM

Just saw on CNN International that Saudi Arabia said, we will pump no more oil,, that`s the limit...hmmmmmm

posted by nooneisabovethelaw on Jul 1, 2008 at 12:36 PM

I'm with Shwaine. That comment caught my eye and my response was very similar, just back a couple of letters in the alphabet on the acronym. It's the height of audacity. Big West is showing its true colors in every step of this operation, and has spent who knows how many thousands of dollars to try to convince us they'll be a good neighbor.

Hey, here's an idea: how about BEING a good neighbor? All this talk of "branding" in marketing has supplanted the idea of "reputation." How about being what you say you are? If politics and business could just remember that little detail, wouldn't this benefit us all?

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: