|
When a trip to urgent care brings a visit from CPS New ratings released for health plans, providers My last B.com blog post: Thanks for everything! Ombudsman: Budget cuts hurt long-term care Kern's longstanding battle with the mosquito Read the complaint filed against Dr. Freesemann, others Tips to avoid hospital, school infections BPD: Drug cache found in Dr. Freesemann's home, motor home The budget dust settles: How did health programs fare? Prominent doctor arrested in drug investigation August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Here's some sites I find useful and interesting: Some fun blogs I like, some health and some random: Got a blog or link to add to this list? Please let me know at ehagedorn@bakersfield.com.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Health leaders worry about fate of Medi-Cal
The failed vote in the Assembly last night to pass a budget has some health leaders worried that the cuts to Medi-Cal won't be restored. Here's an excerpt from an L.A. Times story about the vote: Assembly Republicans on Sunday blocked a proposed spending plan that would have closed the state's $15.2-billion shortfall with the help of tax hikes on the wealthy and corporations. The move by GOP lawmakers came as little surprise on the Assembly floor since Republicans have long said they would vote against the tax proposal. But as public pressure mounted on lawmakers to take action on the budget, and back-room negotiations continued to falter, Democrats decided to bring the measure to the floor Sunday night. Several statements have graced my inbox about the vote. From Jeanette Pruett, systems change advocate from the Kern Independent Living Center, in a statement sent out by Health Access California: I’m very disappointed that the Assembly’s budget compromise was not passed. Without a balanced and fair budget like the one proposed, our community will suffer. We’ll lose health coverage for kids, see big cuts in health care for everyone and watch other vital social services get slashed. From Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access: We appreciate the Assembly leadership's attempt to raise the revenues needed to prevent the worst of the proposed cuts to health care and other vital services — cuts that not only will make millions of Californians pay more and get less care, but also harm the health system we all rely on. The cuts would also hurt our economy, resulting in lost federal matching funds, wages, and jobs into the billions. The budget considered tonight already had tough cuts — including denying a quarter-million children health care — and yet it is being held up by those who want more cuts now and a deceptive limit to make ongoing cuts into the future. That's the wrong direction. From a joint statement from the California Medical Association, Catholic Healthcare West, Health Access, Service Employees International Union and AARP: The Assembly voted on a budget today that would have restored many of the deepest cuts to our health care system, sought prudent sources of new revenue and rejects a risky spending limitation which would automatically force future cuts in health care. It is far from ideal, but it was a step in the right direction. We all want a balanced budget, but thankfully those who supported this version of the budget understand that doing so by crippling the health care safety net upon which we all rely doesn’t make sense. California’s health care system has already been cut to the bone. Additional cuts now to our health care system would cause a ripple effect across California communities putting lives on the line in fewer, overcrowded ERs, crippling local economies with billions of lost federal funds and economic activity, adding to the millions already uninsured and leaving hundreds of thousands of seniors and children without access to care. We encourage all Californians who continue to struggle with this tough economy to join us in urging our leaders in Sacramento to pass a balanced budget that protects California families, patients, employers and local governments. If I receive any more statements, I will be sure to post them. Health Access has been busy trying to get the word out about these cuts. Read "Medi-Cal cuts hurt everyone, not just the poor, study says," which ran over the weekend and describes two studies the group commissioned. For more information about the cuts, read the posts:
10 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
adampayne
on Aug 18, 2008 at 06:20 PM
This is the right wing conspiracy: Protect at any cost the privileged few while denying vital services for working people. It is criminal to continue to allow absolute schills for corporate interests to continue to stalemate the state budget. Jean Fuller is one of these schills. Wouldn't want a yacht tax loophole closed while she's on the job, or to get a budget done on time. Jean Fuller is the biggest waste of tax dollars this community has ever seen. posted by
vanityfair
on Aug 18, 2008 at 08:22 PM
Adampayne, I take exception to your comment. The BEST insured in this state are either government employees or those who work for those nasty "corporate" interests (including unions). I once was insured (for about two years) with a carte blanche policy issued by the government. Didn't have to pay a dime for anything. Being self-employed is a completely different situation. We are now "working people" who make too much to qualify for any services and our premiums are through the roof. And we're trying to pay off a $16,000.00 hospital bill for the birth of our last child, while the "poor" walk away with free services and nine more babies. And by the way, almost NO ONE delivering at Mercy Southwest even spoke English. I know this because the standard of care was so dismal that all of us gals delivering were in rooms separated by accordian walls. None of that touchy-feely-birth experience. All I heard were the two dozen Spanish speaking family members ten feet away from me yakking it up. They got it for free. I didn't. Does that make me racist? Just wondering.
posted by
PawnThyself
on Aug 18, 2008 at 08:32 PM
I hear you, Vanityfair. Barack Obama's health care ideas will do little for people like you. McCain's plan is a step in the right direction. If McCain chooses a particularly bad running mate, I might vote for Obama anyway, but only the convention will tell. Is my memory getting lousy, or are the conventions and running mate announcements running really late this time around? posted by
vanityfair
on Aug 18, 2008 at 08:40 PM
PawnThyself, I do believe the running mate announcements have been a game, because both worthless candidates know that their "electability" hinges on their pick. Personally, I think McCain should choose Lieberman to appeal to the more moderate constituency. From what I understand, they have a good personal relationship as well. posted by
PawnThyself
on Aug 18, 2008 at 08:46 PM
posted by
adampayne
on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:19 AM
How is John McCain's plan a step in the right direction? Joh McCain's plan is basically more of the same insurance crap we already are suffering from. At this stage for profit insurers run the game along with the pharmaceutical cartel. We are at a place and time where 97% all firms (large and small) pay less than fifty percent of their employees' premiums. For an individual employee 77% of all companies offering health benefits pay less than 25% premium. For an employee with family coverage working at a company offering health benefits 61% pay less than 25% of the premium. These statisitics are from a 2007 Kaiser study. If you want to access the report follow this link. You can view the incredible health care cost increases that have occurred in the past four years over all other economic indicators. You can see how the benefits have dramatically declined over this decade from the workplace. McCain offers no solution. His plan is health savings accounts as a tax benefit and increased competition for an unregulated health insurance industry. Who do you think really benefits when a tax benfefit is formulated by Republicans? It sure is not the working family. There are a multitude of reports in the Google world you can access indicating that the only beneficiaries of the Bush tax cuts are at the very top of the economic pyramid. I find very disturbing that all of Europe with Taiwan and Japan can effectively cover all their citizens along with noncitizens living within their borders, but the United States cannot. We have an economy pegged near $15 trillion dollars and we spend over $2.2 trillion ( highest per capita expense on the planet) on health care and still see 15% of our population uninsured, and estimates by many economists that underinsured people may be at roughly 25% to 35% of the pie. We are the only country where you can go bankrupt over medical expenses. What does John McCain say about that? Nothing!!!!! Not that any of this has much to do with our criminally incompetent Republican members of the California Assembly for failing to approve a budget. If you actually know what John McCain's vision for health care improvements are please let me know, because he has been vague to the extreme on the issue. posted by
randomfactor
on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:32 AM
"Health Savings Accounts" do *EVERYTHING* wrong. They're demonstrably worse than the current system. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:45 AM
I also hope McCain chooses Joe Lieberman, the Democratic vice presidential prick in 2000 who is now an independent.
RF, have you seen that AP article? posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Here's what we can't do with health care: Nothing Anything that helps insurance companies Anything that helps Drug companies posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:49 AM
I agree that health savings accounts do nothing to help the problem. Poor and middle class people can't save money for a rainy day, how are they expected to save money so the insurance companies can still profit?
We need to turn the health care industry into a non-profit system that rewards doctors for having healthy patients.
1
Advertisement |