|
Kern County Animal Control McCain and the Earmark State For Better Or For Worse HealthCare Woes Continue for Too Many Americans What Does Libertarian Mean? Concert Night -Steve Miller Band & Joe Cocker- Panorama Vandalism Oh, Really? O'Reilly Mad Men -Season 2 Premiere- July 27 The Joker Is Coming August 13 June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
DUI Checkpoints
Does any one else find it troubling that DUI checkpoints only seem to be held at in the very poorest of locations in this county? I see nine arrests were made in Wasco, at Central and Highway 46 this past weekend. There was one on East California Avenue very recently. There was also one on South Union Avenue not long ago, and another at East Truxton Avenue if memory serves me. I do not recall seeing any on Calloway and Rosedale or Stockdale. I do not recall one at the Truxton Exchange and Coffee Road. Don't people with means ever drink? Does the check point have more to do with poverty than safety?
25 comments from 11 users
1
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Nov 19, 2007 at 11:56 AM
posted by
OldBlue56
on Nov 19, 2007 at 12:04 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Nov 19, 2007 at 12:23 PM
posted by
adampayne
on Nov 19, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Anyway, thanks for the information. posted by
woofwoof
on Nov 19, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Adam, I think PP2 has it spot on. They have to have them in "poor" neighborhoods (really meaning places where illegals live), because they aren't suppose to be driving without licenses. And under the ruse of it being called a DUI checkpoint, makes it shadow the fact, they're trying to remove some of these people from the road. BUT, they're still NOT checking immigration status....i know i know, it's not their job, right?
posted by
robbwillis
on Nov 19, 2007 at 12:41 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Nov 19, 2007 at 12:48 PM
posted by
OldBlue56
on Nov 19, 2007 at 01:01 PM
Adam, all the checkpoints I referred to were reported in the TBC, either online or in print. I was not necessarily referring to you on this blog, as it happens daily here. However, when you say they "seem" to be held in poor areas, and they aren't, according to the news, it's does not sound very informed. And PP, the police also conduct drivers license checkpoints. These too have been ruled legal. And of course they are going after people driving illegally, like with suspended licenses, no license, no insurance, false tags, ect. Woof, I hate to break this to you, but the "illegals" are driving all over this town, not just the poor neighborhoods. Who do you think is doing all the construction in the new housing tracts all over town? They commute every morning all over town, just like everyone else. And you are right, the local police do not enforce the Federal immigration laws. If they did, they would not be available to respond to all the other calls that come in every few minutes from the public. Plus, if the Feds aren't going to have an enforcement office here in town, why should the local police and sheriff do their job? posted by
dgrealish
on Nov 19, 2007 at 02:20 PM
posted by
Jans
on Nov 19, 2007 at 02:35 PM
Adam I have never thought about that but it is so true. The BPD must think only us poor people are the only drinkers. The BPD are targeting the poor and the well-off are getting away with drinking and driving. This does not make much sense at all.
posted by
dgrealish
on Nov 19, 2007 at 02:45 PM
posted by
dgrealish
on Nov 19, 2007 at 03:08 PM
Don't make me have to use all upper case, OK. ( ; -) so everyone understands it's a joke) All the DUI check points I've been seen have been in my neighborhood or on my side of town (Rosedale) because that's where I live, work, shop and play. I only see the CHP officers with their radar guns in my neighborhood for the same reason. Believe me, I see them all the time. People in Stockdale see them all the time. posted by
dgrealish
on Nov 19, 2007 at 03:37 PM
posted by
OldBlue56
on Nov 19, 2007 at 03:38 PM
Timec, you are an angry little black women. (If you aren't little, no disrespect meant). It is much easier for you to make your racist comments than actually contribute anything constructive to a discussion. And in a few years, when whites are a minority in this state, and Hispanics are a majority, what's your argument going to be for stopping "minorities?" posted by
adampayne
on Nov 19, 2007 at 03:39 PM
And you don't have to shout out your loud colors to make your point, or use a tone as though people reading your responses don't understand. posted by
OldBlue56
on Nov 19, 2007 at 03:42 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Nov 19, 2007 at 03:49 PM
posted by
dgrealish
on Nov 19, 2007 at 03:53 PM
posted by
Lingtaowoo
on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:27 PM
North,South,East,or West Bakersfield...what's the diff...as long as they are caught and off the road...I'm just glad that law enforcement is getting them off the road...for awhile at least..
posted by
OldBlue56
on Nov 19, 2007 at 04:30 PM
posted by
Baylee
on Nov 19, 2007 at 05:03 PM
Yeah the drunk ones.
posted by
OldBlue56
on Nov 19, 2007 at 05:17 PM
Timec, again, you show your ignorance. The DUI checkpoints have a set way they are conducted, as per the law. It is not based on the driver's race, sex, or whether they are driving a nice BMW 525i, or a p.o.s. 1994 Honda. Now I will say that any good officer can find a reason to stop just about any vehicle he/she sees, if they know the law. There is almost no vehicle that can't be LEGALLY stopped. There are all kinds of reasons, but I won't overload your little, or big, head with the reasons. posted by
dgrealish
on Nov 19, 2007 at 05:21 PM
To say it was a difficult weekend is an understatement. Anyone who read The KB Blogs knows what I'm talking about. Here's what I learned from that effort. You can't open a closed mind. I know that statement will be turned around and used on me, but remember, I'm the one who put it out there. When the facts have been placed before someone and they refuse to look at them then continue to give the same sad excuse, all they want is to argue. Many of us have seen DUI checkpoints in our own neighborhoods. I've seen them twice on Gosford. Once at Ming & Gosford and once at White Lane & Gosford, but this makes no difference to people who want to promote the same tired agenda. I refuse to waste another ounce of precious energy on this type of discussion. It goes nowhere and causes irreparable damage. posted by
OldBlue56
on Nov 19, 2007 at 05:31 PM
DG, you have hit the nail right on it's head! And no Murph, since Jason spanked my hand for being mean to Panfilio, I am a good little blogger now. (he's the blog Nazi). No XXX from my fingers... (just kidding JS). posted by
NancyII
on Nov 19, 2007 at 05:36 PM
The only time I was stopped in a DUI checkpoint it was on Rosedale Highway in front of Rockin Rodeo on New Years Eve. My then fiance was driving a new ford pickup and we were both dressed up for the evening. And we are both "white." License was checked, registration was checked, flashlights in our faces, a couple of questions..and we were on our way. Yup..we were profiled all right, we were driving on the road, guess that made us fair game, danged white people. By the way..by 11 AM on Saturday most everyone in Wasco knew about the checkpoint...it wasn't much of a surprise since it was in the local weekly newspaper. And just to clue everyone in, nine arrests for traffic or license violations isn't a huge amount in Wasco. So what I hear you saying is that because they put a checkpoint up in Wasco they're targeting unlicensed drivers. Correct me if I'm wrong here but isn't that what they're supposed to be doing?
1
Our readers recommend: |