|
Only 171 days left! Jumping death sad for all Chris McCandless lives! Comics poll is deadly serious Killing bears with kindness Lock up your restaurants: The Angelenos are coming Amtrak customers 'interesting' 10,000 songs in a row Freedom Fries live on in Bako! Taking your bets May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 Submit your local links to bakosphere@bakersfield.com.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
New cell phone ban begins tomorrow
At our morning news meeting we talked about the ban on driving while using a cell phone which goes into effect tomorrow. A few interesting points were brought up: The fine is pretty nominal, so will it really deter people? Will local law enforcement really crack down on the miscreants who insist on ignoring the ban? Will the ban lead to more drivers texting while driving, as this practice isn't illegal? Does the ban apply to the police? Here's our story on the new law with all the relevant details. Meanwhile, the L.A. Times says the ban won't improve road safety at all. But perhaps most importantly of all, will the new law result in more dillweeds wandering around with those idiotic Bluetooths strapped to their ears? 13 comments from 10 users
1
posted by
timec
on Jun 30, 2008 at 11:41 AM
Can I use my speaker that is built into the phone....just wondering? I love my old phone. I do not want to upgrade.. posted by
pawz
on Jun 30, 2008 at 12:50 PM
timec, yes you can as long as it is on a stand of some kind, like the ones that plug into an air vent. I don't understand the part of the law that allows texting but not talking, texting is far more dangerous than talking as most people cannot text with out looking at the phone, which of course takes their eyes off th road. posted by
Rettchr
on Jun 30, 2008 at 12:57 PM
Pawz, our lawmakers are trying to get another law passed that will also make texting illegal -- it seems that no one really thought to include that in the original law. posted by
s810
on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Why ask this question: "Will local law enforcement really crack down on the miscreants who insist on ignoring the ban?" You (Bakersfield Californian) just ran an article a week ago stating that they will not. Read your own paper!
posted by
gube
on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:15 PM
I for one will not stick that stupid looking thing in my ear........I guess that I'll have 1 eye on my phone and the other eye will be on the lookout for the fuzz.......... posted by
timec
on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:35 PM
I heard the fine was only 20 dollars...I may have to take my chances... posted by
michele1075
on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:55 PM
Timec- I will be using my speakerphone as well. I really do think those blue tooth pieces are ugly!! posted by
TomW
on Jun 30, 2008 at 02:00 PM
michele, they aren't all ugly: http://www.jawbone.com/ I've got one I hate. I may have to hack it and turn it into something a bit more me.
posted by
NancyII
on Jun 30, 2008 at 02:13 PM
posted by
Infowar
on Jun 30, 2008 at 03:06 PM
www.popgadget.net/2008/06/cell_phone_radi.php
Posted by Tam Category: body| cell phones| current affairs| feature
06. 13. 2008Cell phone radiation and brain tumors
Come July 1, you can get a ticket for Talking While Driving in California. But no matter where we live, we all know we shouldn't drive while talking on cell phones because it increases the risk of accidents. An exception in California is car talk with a Bluetooth connection, but even hands-free phone time can be risky. Suppose you get distracted from driving because you're carrying on a Bluetooth argument with your cell service provider about mystery phone charges? Or with your kid for running up those charges? But there's another potential danger from cell phones. What health risks, if any, might come from cell phone radiation? Especially risk of brain tumors? I first wrote about this topic 8 years ago. While it's usually pleasant for a writer to discover that an ancient article is not yet out of date, this time it's a bit dismaying. In the year 2000 we didn't know for sure whether cell phone radiation could cause brain tumors. Now that cell phones are in the hands of maybe a billion people (and, more to the point, held to their ears only an inch or so from the brain), it's worrying to realize that nothing much has changed. We still don't know for sure. As CNET recently observed, "So, in short, the jury is still out, research is ongoing, and we will continue to monitor its results." Little more is known about the radiation risks today than back at the turn of the century. Additional studies published in the past few years claim that cell phone use is safe. But the studies didn't examine the effects of long-term and frequent phoning. Most of us will be using our cell phones for decades. Many of us use them for hours every day. The CNET comment comes from its recent roundup of US government data on cell phone radiation levels for dozens of phone models sold in the US. The lists are preceded by a brief explanation of what they mean. They are organized by manufacturer, so it's easy to check yours out. There are also separate lists of the ten phones with the highest and lowest radiation emissions. CNET's compilation was called to my attention by the New York Times's fine health columnist, Tara Parker-Pope. Take a look also at her previous piece on cell phone radiation and cancer. She describes comments from 3 high-profile neurosurgeons who battle their patients' brain tumors every day. The neurosurgeons all use cell phones, of course. But they also note that they don't hold the phones next to their ears. 'Nuff said.
posted by
NancyII
on Jun 30, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Answer to the CB question that I asked earlier. Know Your Facts About California Cellular Phone Law Starting July 1, 2008Drivers 18 Years and Older
|