A blog about Kern County, News, and Technology.
About bakosphere


Address:
1707 Eye St.
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Member Since:
May 14, 2007
Last Signed In:
September 04, 2008
Profile Views:
1553
Blog Views:
66115
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Only 171 days left!
Jumping death sad for all
Chris McCandless lives!
Comics poll is deadly serious
Killing bears with kindness
Lock up your restaurants: The Angelenos are coming
Amtrak customers 'interesting'
10,000 songs in a row
Freedom Fries live on in Bako!
Taking your bets
Archives
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
The Bakosphere Blogroll

Submit your local links to bakosphere@bakersfield.com.

A Bakersfield Biker
America the Bold
Amy's Musings - Tales from an Anti-Soccer Mom
AndyNoise.com
As simple as it should be
Atheist Community of Bakersfield
Atheist in a mini-van
Bad Carma
Bake Town, CA
Bakersfield Bubble
Bakersfield Hash House Harriers
Bakersfield SkyWatch Blog
Bakersfield Underground Music Scene
BakoFashionDo
Bako Life
Becky in Bakersfield
The Black Dog Experience
Blog Bakersfield
The Church / State Wall
CompuDave
Condors Blogs/The Neutral Zone
Contingencies
daddy in a strange land
The Dalloways Blog
Diary of a Madwoman
Digital Chain
Downtown B-Town
Every Lie They Print
FHS 1986
Fight the Bite!
Films in Bakersfield
Flaunt Vidalma
The Four Dimensional Vector of Becca Jennings
From the Ground Up
GagFilms.com Blog
Girls Talkin Smack
Glutton Bakersfield
Hockey Talk/Trash Talk (N.L. Bobblehead)
Housewife in Bakersfield
Indigenous Geek
Inevitably Keely
Its my right to be left of the center
Jenny's Blablablog
Julia Heatherwick - Ar tSpeak
Julie Unplugged
Kern County Democratic Party Weblog
Kern Gamers
Kern Valley Vulture Watch
Mexican on a Diet
The Moron Parade
New Leaves in March
On the Go...
One Bakersfield Woman's Blog to All Mankind
Paperback Writer
Pawprint City Times
Rob Shock
Seven Bates
Sirens Chronicles
Sonicrusk Blog
Sumo Merriment
Theatre Addict
Update on Vicki
The Village News
Volkslaugh.com Blog

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


bakosphere - > Bakosphere -> New cell phone ban begins tomorrow
New cell phone ban begins tomorrow

At our morning news meeting we talked about the ban on driving while using a cell phone which goes into effect tomorrow.

A few interesting points were brought up:

The fine is pretty nominal, so will it really deter people?

Will local law enforcement really crack down on the miscreants who insist on ignoring the ban?

Will the ban lead to more drivers texting while driving, as this practice isn't illegal?

Does the ban apply to the police?

Here's our story on the new law with all the relevant details.

Meanwhile, the L.A. Times says the ban won't improve road safety at all.

But perhaps most importantly of all, will the new law result in more dillweeds wandering around with those idiotic Bluetooths strapped to their ears?

Posted in the News interest group.
Topics: driving, cell phone, texting
posted by bakosphere on Monday, June 30, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 204 times
13 comments from 10 users

1

posted by timec on Jun 30, 2008 at 11:41 AM

Can I use my speaker that is built into the phone....just wondering? I love my old phone. I do not want to upgrade..

posted by pawz on Jun 30, 2008 at 12:50 PM

timec, yes you can as long as it is on a stand of some kind, like the ones that plug into an air vent.  I don't understand the part of the law that allows texting but not talking, texting is far more dangerous than talking as most people cannot text with out looking at the phone, which of course takes their eyes off th road.

posted by Rettchr on Jun 30, 2008 at 12:57 PM

Pawz, our lawmakers are trying to get another law passed that will also make texting illegal -- it seems that no one really thought to include that in the original law.   

posted by s810 on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:11 PM

Why ask this question: "Will local law enforcement really crack down on the miscreants who insist on ignoring the ban?"

You (Bakersfield Californian) just ran an article a week ago stating that they will not.

Read your own paper!

 

posted by gube on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:15 PM

I for one will not stick that stupid looking thing in my ear........I guess that I'll have 1 eye on my phone and the other eye will be on the lookout for the fuzz..........

posted by timec on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:35 PM

I heard the fine was only 20 dollars...I may have to take my chances...

posted by michele1075 on Jun 30, 2008 at 01:55 PM

Timec- I will be using my speakerphone as well. I really do think those blue tooth pieces are ugly!!

posted by TomW on Jun 30, 2008 at 02:00 PM

michele, they aren't all ugly: http://www.jawbone.com/

I've got one I hate.  I may have to hack it and turn it into something a bit more me.

 

posted by NancyII on Jun 30, 2008 at 02:13 PM

What about CB'ers?  Are they included in the ban?

posted by Infowar on Jun 30, 2008 at 03:06 PM

 

 

www.popgadget.net/2008/06/cell_phone_radi.php

 

Posted by Tam    Category:

body

|

cell phones

|

current affairs

|

feature

 

 

06. 13. 2008

Cell phone radiation and brain tumors

sea-of-cellphones.jpg

Come July 1, you can get a ticket for Talking While Driving in California. But no matter where we live, we all know we shouldn't drive while talking on cell phones because it increases the risk of accidents. An exception in California is car talk with a Bluetooth connection, but even hands-free phone time can be risky. Suppose you get distracted from driving because you're carrying on a Bluetooth argument with your cell service provider about mystery phone charges? Or with your kid for running up those charges?

But there's another potential danger from cell phones. What health risks, if any, might come from cell phone radiation? Especially risk of brain tumors?

I first wrote about this topic 8 years ago. While it's usually pleasant for a writer to discover that an ancient article is not yet out of date, this time it's a bit dismaying. In the year 2000 we didn't know for sure whether cell phone radiation could cause brain tumors. Now that cell phones are in the hands of maybe a billion people (and, more to the point, held to their ears only an inch or so from the brain), it's worrying to realize that nothing much has changed. We still don't know for sure.

As CNET recently observed, "So, in short, the jury is still out, research is ongoing, and we will continue to monitor its results." Little more is known about the radiation risks today than back at the turn of the century. Additional studies published in the past few years claim that cell phone use is safe. But the studies didn't examine the effects of long-term and frequent phoning. Most of us will be using our cell phones for decades. Many of us use them for hours every day.

The CNET comment comes from its recent roundup of US government data on cell phone radiation levels for dozens of phone models sold in the US. The lists are preceded by a brief explanation of what they mean. They are organized by manufacturer, so it's easy to check yours out. There are also separate lists of the ten phones with the highest and lowest radiation emissions.

CNET's compilation was called to my attention by the New York Times's fine health columnist, Tara Parker-Pope. Take a look also at her previous piece on cell phone radiation and cancer. She describes comments from 3 high-profile neurosurgeons who battle their patients' brain tumors every day. The neurosurgeons all use cell phones, of course. But they also note that they don't hold the phones next to their ears. 'Nuff said.

 

posted by NancyII on Jun 30, 2008 at 04:09 PM

Answer to the CB question that I asked earlier.

Know Your Facts About California Cellular Phone Law Starting July 1, 2008

Drivers 18 Years and OlderCalifornia Contra Costa Mortgages Loans Bank of America

Q:  When do the new cellular phone laws take effect?
A:  The new laws take effect July 1, 2008.

Q:  What if I need to use my phone during an emergency and I do not have a hands-free device?
A:  The law allows a driver using a wireless telephone to make emergency calls, including, but not limited to, calls to a law enforcement agency, health care provider, fire department, or other emergency services agency.

Q:  What are the fine(s) if I am convicted?
A:  The base fine for a first offense is $20, and $50 for each subsequent conviction. The courts will impose additional administrative fees.

Q:  Will I receive a point on my driving record if I am convicted for a violation of the cellular phone law?
A:  No. The violation is a reportable offense; however, DMV will not assign a violation point.

Q:  Will a conviction appear on my driving record?
A:  Yes, but a violation point will not be added.

Q:  I drive a commercial vehicle and my phone has a "push-to-talk" feature that does not require me to place the phone to my ear, will I still be required to use a hands-free device?
A:  No. Only class "A" or "B" licensees operating a truck tractor as defined in Vehicle Code (VC) §655 or a motor truck as defined in VC §410 are allowed to use a "push-to-talk" feature.
NOTE: This exemption does not apply to drivers of pickup trucks with commercial plates, even if the pickup truck is used for commercial purposes, for example, a contractor, landscaper, or other business.

Q:  May I use a dedicated two-way radio while driving?
A:  Yes. The use of dedicated two-way radios such as walkie-talkies and Citizen Band (CB) radios, which are
not part of a wireless telephone, is not affected by the new law.

Q:  May I use a speaker-phone feature and hold the phone in my hand, but not next to my ear?
A:  No. The law requires you use a hands-free device with your phone. A "push-to-talk" feature is not allowed.
Q:  My car has a built-in hands-free mobile phone feature. Is this adequate or do I have to buy additional equipment?

A:  No. You do not need to purchase additional equipment. You may use your vehicle's hands-free mobile phone feature.

Q:  Are passengers covered by this law?
A:  No, this law applies to the persons driving a motor vehicle.


 

 

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jun 30, 2008 at 04:12 PM

I don't see why this is such a big issue.

posted by TomW on Jun 30, 2008 at 04:33 PM

Nancy, you can use "push-to-talk", but only if you are an A or B driver or your push-to-talk isn't a feature on a phone.  So you can't use push-to-talk on a Motorola phone, but you can send a text message.  Nice law.


1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: