|
Bakersfield not so giving, magazine says Secret menus at Bakersfield restaurants Videos galore of local marching bands Shocker: Bakersfield not safe for pedestrians Does Ryan Mathews deserve Heisman consideration? Bakersfield man with colorful record in middle of billion-dollar Chevron dispute Mobile haiku puts Bakersfield in new light Songs do more than namedrop Bakersfield Pedro Martinez taken back to his Bakersfield Dodger days Fresno piles on the hate for Bakersfield May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Submit your local links to bakosphere@bakersfield.com. Bakersfield Observed CompuDave greener bakersfield
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
The 'G' in PG&E stands for 'GAY'!
Thanks to the Bakersfield Republican Assembly for discovering why your PG&E bill is so high. And while we're on the bender agenda, here's gawker.com on Anderson Cooper.
34 comments from 18 users
1
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 30, 2008 at 07:32 AM
posted by
TSM
on Jul 30, 2008 at 07:48 AM
And while we're on the bender agenda, here's gawker.com on Anderson Cooper. Apparently the Californian believes that by competing with the National Enquirer it can stay in business just a little bit longer.
posted by
TSM
on Jul 30, 2008 at 07:53 AM
At least PG&E operates in California. $1.2 million has been collected by the pro group from sources outside the state.
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 30, 2008 at 07:56 AM
posted by
sagefever
on Jul 30, 2008 at 07:56 AM
That is pathetic.In outrage I think they should shut off the utilities,do the same at their homes,and pull the web site ... :-) j/k posted by
FloridaStateGrad
on Jul 30, 2008 at 08:01 AM
posted by
catpaw
on Jul 30, 2008 at 08:04 AM
You just posted an implication the a major utility corporation is "pro gay." Was the money a collection from employees? Did the board of directors vote to make this donation? Was there a public statement accompanying the donation? Likewise, the Cooper link repeats nothing but rumor and gossip. If you're going to report news, report news. Your post doesn't tell me anything. posted by
AudreyB
on Jul 30, 2008 at 08:09 AM
Look at the outrage when a public utility takes a stand on the gay marriage initiative. Where was the outrage when two public officials took a stand on the gay marriage initiative? posted by
bakosphere
on Jul 30, 2008 at 08:15 AM
posted by
adampayne
on Jul 30, 2008 at 08:56 AM
I find it curious that the poster of this item has no clue how political action committee money is gathered, and that donations of this kind, whatever the political agenda, have no relation to the costs of service. Only the most ignorant and malicious of individuals would try and posit any correlation between PAC money and costs of service. I think after seeing many of these Bakosphere posts recently that TBC should relaunch this blog as Bakosmear. Maybe, as a service to your legion of subscribers, you could report on what is happening regarding this initiative. Here is an excerpt fom the July 27 San Francisco Chronicle reporting on donations:
(07-27) 19:14 PDT -- When Bruce Bastian of Utah stood up Saturday night at a San Francisco dinner and wrote a $1 million check for the campaign against Proposition 8, he made it clearer than ever that November's ballot fight over a ban on same-sex marriage won't be a California-only affair. Supporters of the effort to ban same-sex marriage already have taken in more than $1.2 million from out-of-state contributors for the fall campaign. And even before Bastian, a co-founder of the WordPerfect software company, opened his checkbook, gay and lesbian rights groups and their supporters from around the country had put more than $1.3 million into the fight against the ballot initiative. "This is a campaign that's important to the entire country, not just California," said Brad Luna, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, sponsor of the fundraising dinner that brought more than 750 people to the St. Francis Hotel on Saturday. "The result will have effects across the United States." Maybe you and your crack staff could investigate and report on the ongoing change of description for Proposition 8, and subsequent lawsuit filed to oppose the new description. posted by
TomW
on Jul 30, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Yeah, it has nothing to do with the fact that we live in 3000 square foot houses and leave everything on. posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jul 30, 2008 at 09:18 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 30, 2008 at 09:28 AM
posted by
Goofy1
on Jul 30, 2008 at 10:20 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 30, 2008 at 10:34 AM
posted by
blognroll
on Jul 30, 2008 at 01:06 PM
I can take a little heat. I've turned my air conditioner off, and I'll be drinking bolthouse farms drinks to cool off. posted by
murphyslaw
on Jul 30, 2008 at 01:33 PM
My Air is not working properly so it's turned off. We went to using the cooler seeing that we have both. I'm in no hurry, I'll have Stockdale out in a week or two to repair it . ;=))) We'd set the Air at 78 for nights and my cooler brings it right down to 65, with less electricity. posted by
blognroll
on Jul 30, 2008 at 01:40 PM
That's cool, murphyslaw. And for those of you who may be wondering, they don't pay me a penny for this: http://people.bakersfield.c...
posted by
NancyII
on Jul 30, 2008 at 01:57 PM
A young man recently told me he had a window A/C in one end of his house and an window swamp cooler in the other. Both running at the same time. I asked him if he knew how each one worked. He didn't. Sigh....... I keep my A/C on about 82 most of the time. Unless it's a scorcher early, it doesn't even come on til after 2-3 in the afternoon. I drop it a Little at bedtime to cool it down for sleeping then raise it back up to 85 ish some nights. The only reason I do that is that my bedroom corner faces into the sun with both windows catching it all. I have a ceiling fan, a small fan on the nightstand, and a box fan in the hall blowing into the BR. The house is lath and plaster and really keeps my utility bills down in the summer. In the winter it's another story as the house is above ground and the floors are cold as ice. posted by
blognroll
on Jul 30, 2008 at 02:06 PM
It sounds like you could be in for a long, cold winter, Nancy. But I have total faith in you to come up with creative ways of keeping warm :) Maybe Bolthouse Farms will start making hot drinks too. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 30, 2008 at 02:35 PM
I got plenty of blankets. Spam Code HIS BS. Not namin' any names (and Nancy, you're off the hook...) posted by
blognroll
on Jul 30, 2008 at 02:42 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 30, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Why not? Brown did the right thing in properly summing up the initiative. Same-sex couples have the right to marry under the California Constitution. The hate amendment would attempt to change the Constitution so as to remove that right from certain residents of California. Were you hoping to lie your way into the Constitution? Shame. I won't touch Big Macs *OR* BigotHouse Farms drinks, thanks. Oh, and thanks for the link--I may have to go get one of their Angus burgers to thank McDonalds. At least *THEY* are palatable. Glad to know that McDonalds is socially conscious on *SOME* issues--just not nutrition, global warming, fair wages... posted by
blognroll
on Jul 30, 2008 at 02:47 PM
The hate amendment? There it goes again, the myth that for somebody to be loving, that person has to rubber stamp everything under the sun. Gulp! posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 30, 2008 at 02:51 PM
No, but for someone to be loving, they have to grant the same rights to everyone that they themselves enjoy. The official definition of love is "That condition where someone else's happiness is important to your own." In this case, it means "if *I* get to marry the person I choose, so do *YOU*." The opposite of that is hate--where it's important to you that someone else *LOSE* his or her chance at happiness. Prop 8 is truly the "hate amendment." That is its purpose; that is its intent; that would be its effect if it weren't for the fact that the SCOCA would be likely to slap it down even if California had the misfortune to vote it in. Just like the *LAST* hate attempt, the one they knocked down this year. Gulp on *THAT*. posted by
Ray_Harwick
on Jul 30, 2008 at 03:47 PM
posted by
medlock
on Jul 31, 2008 at 11:51 AM
It's a sad sounding name, but that's exactly what it is..eliminating rights. Thank goodness integration was never but on the ballot! If PG&E had donated the money to the opposite side, all those who are now making a fuss would be praising them. I wonder what issue the religious right-wingers are going to stab their cross into and wind up next? posted by
learnem
on Jul 31, 2008 at 12:26 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 31, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Because they're legally citizens of California? Because they want to? Because it ticks off the bigots? All good reasons. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 31, 2008 at 12:29 PM
posted by
learnem
on Jul 31, 2008 at 12:33 PM
everything is fine and dandy as long as you agree with it, but imagine for a minute they donated to a cause you didnt believe in posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 31, 2008 at 02:52 PM
Sounds like the American "Family" Association is starting to get worried that schools can't teach hatred anymore: If California Prop 8 Fails, Public Schools Will be Required by Law to Teach Children that Same-Sex Marriage is Honorable ========================================= Heaven forfend anyone should teach that marriage is honorable or sacred! posted by
medlock
on Jul 31, 2008 at 07:44 PM
If there's one thing Christian extremists don't want their children to learn...it's learning to respect opinions outside of their own. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 31, 2008 at 08:42 PM
Next thing you know, Sesame Street will be acceptable television. I mean really, they actually teach kids not to discriminate. (snark alert)
1
Advertisement |