|
Christmas lights tour -- with a twist Bakersfield not so giving, magazine says Secret menus at Bakersfield restaurants Videos galore of local marching bands Shocker: Bakersfield not safe for pedestrians Does Ryan Mathews deserve Heisman consideration? Bakersfield man with colorful record in middle of billion-dollar Chevron dispute Mobile haiku puts Bakersfield in new light Songs do more than namedrop Bakersfield Pedro Martinez taken back to his Bakersfield Dodger days May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Submit your local links to bakosphere@bakersfield.com. Bakersfield Observed CompuDave greener bakersfield
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Fuller proposes expansion of highway memorial signs
Bakersfield Assemblywoman Jean Fuller is at the center of legislation that would revise Caltrans policy allowing families of people killed in highway accidents to pay $1,000 for official memorial signs at the crash sites. Fuller amended the original language -- which focused on victims of DUI accidents -- to allow memorial signs for those killed in accidents due to other causes. According to this Los Angeles Times story, Fuller's impetus is several recent accidents in the Taft area. Proponents say the formal signs reduce the handmade memorials that often surface along roadsides, creating dangerous situations for people visiting the sites and adding to the memorials, as well as Caltrans workers who have to remove them. Critics say the official memorials add to "sign pollution" along California roadways. The Assembly has approved Fuller's idea, but the Senate has yet to take action. What do you think? 10 comments from 7 users
1
posted by
AudreyB
on Aug 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM
posted by
bonuschris
on Aug 10, 2009 at 11:18 AM
I wish there were fewer memorial signs. It takes more than a sign to make something a memorial item. How about the Mark Salvaggio Interchange or the Rosa Parks Memorial Freeway. What does Highway 58 have to do with Rosa Parks? Apart from the sign, how does the highway represent Rosa Parks? How about the interchage at Airport Drive & 99. How does that memorialize the CHP officer killed in a shootout a few years ago? The answer is that they are nothing more than signs. If we need to bring attention to someone I am sure we can find better ways to do it in our modern society. As far as the roadside memorials, I don't really see the point. Again, if we need to bring attention to a dangerous stretch of road I am sure we can find a better way. posted by
AudreyB
on Aug 10, 2009 at 11:26 AM
A memorial is whatever it represents to the surviving family members. If a memorial to their loved one is what they want, more power to them. Your opinion is just your opinon. posted by
antiextremism
on Aug 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM
Hopefully people won't wreck looking at all the Memorials to people that......errr...wrecked. posted by
AudreyB
on Aug 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM
posted by
CatherineBaker
on Aug 10, 2009 at 11:51 AM
I think Fuller should focus on the state budget and mind her own business and stay out of it. It's just another way for the state to shoulder itself into private affairs. posted by
LastRites
on Aug 10, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Can anyone have a memorial sign if they fork over $1,000? Could I pay $1,000 and have the Michael Jackson Memorial Highway. (I wouldn't but I'm just saying). Please Jean, less memorial signs and more information signs. If you drive around the Midwest, you'll see what restaurants, gas stations, etc... are at each exit. Why not ask some of those gas stations/restaurants to pay a small fee for the highway signage? You're doing travelers a service. posted by
catpaw
on Aug 10, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Nice sentiment and 40 years ago I'd be all for it. These days, too much traffic going too fast for our roads. I don't see the practicality of it. posted by
antiextremism
on Aug 10, 2009 at 01:58 PM
Nah Audrey, but the more signs that are up, the less you pay attention to the important ones, like where the next bathroom is!!! I have no problem with the little memorials on the side of the road, I just think there should be a limit on 'officially' placed ones. But......what the heck...if Mark Salvaggio can get an interchange named after him, then why would we be surprised if it is proposed that the Garces Circle be changed to the Chad Vegas Circus......errrrr ....Circle. posted by
jmabbott888
on Aug 10, 2009 at 03:42 PM
Hope she does some research on her own with this bill since it's obvious she didn't on SB670 which she voted for with no substantiated evidence. I for one won't vote for her again.
1
Advertisement |