A blog about Politics and News.
About citybeat


Real Name:
Gretchen Wenner
Address:
1707 Eye Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Member Since:
November 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 18, 2009
Profile Views:
1859
Blog Views:
37798
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Wednesday night meeting
Bike riders: Watch for drilling rig on bike path!
Canyons meeting under way... Bldrs Exchange drama...
Recycling wackiness
State's property values decline for first time since 1933...
City seeking applicants for Board of Building Appeals
Homebuilders v. city (and county): Latest buzz
Council, Weds night: development "freeze?"
Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan?
And they're off! City Council seat beckons...
Archives
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download to print on the go with the
City Beat Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


citybeat - > City Beat -> Taft takes on Second Amendment, too
Taft takes on Second Amendment, too

Bakersfield did it. Now Taft can, too. On Tuesday night, the Taft City Council will consider their own resolution in support of the Second Amendment.

Bakersfield passed it 6-1. Anyone care to hazard how the five Taft councilmembers will vote?

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by citybeat on Monday, March 31, 2008 at 05:54 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 57 times
3 comments from 3 users

1

posted by bnfl on Mar 31, 2008 at 10:43 PM

 Somehow I missed the Bakersfield vote. Who was the one who voted against? Inquiring minds (OK, just mine ;) want to know!


posted by citybeat on Mar 31, 2008 at 11:54 PM

Sue Benham voted against. She said she supports the Second Amendment, but had no truck with purely political resolutions, so voted no.

 

posted by CurtDalton on Apr 1, 2008 at 02:00 AM

City councils and county boards of supervisors SHOULD vote on these issues.  Not only should they vote on these controversial issues, they need to do it more often!

For the most part, these lower political offices are (so-called) non-partisan positions.  However, I never saw a small-time politician that didn't want to be a big-time politician and knowing how they feel about citizens rights enables the citizenry to gage their worth before they get elevated into a more powerful position. Hence the phrase "All politics is local"

These votes on hot-button issues are NOT political grandstanding and any politician that ducks a vote by labeling these a purely political gesture needs to put on the hot seat. 

The only thing missing here is I believe the politicians need to put their money where their mouth is.  That is: have their city or county council draft the legal papers to join in the legal battle as a friend of the court. Otherwise it's all showmanship and no backbone.    (Not that any politicians have a backbone --  Actually I think politicians have to have their backbone surgically removed before they take office)

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement