A blog about News, Politics, News, and Politics.
About citybeat


Real Name:
James Geluso
Address:
1707 Eye Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Member Since:
November 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 19, 2008
Profile Views:
1157
Blog Views:
16538
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Westside Parkway speeds up
Baseball in Bakersfield
The Weir recall: It's over, but it's not over
Block walls made of gold bricks
"Bakersfield" man touts cred on Staten Island blog
Why Couch voted no
How the state budget affects the Weir recall effort
Council approves development fee at end of late session
Public commenter pushes Harvey Hall's limits
Ken Weir hosting community meetings
Archives
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


citybeat - > City Beat -> Ken Weir: Why Johnson has to go
Ken Weir: Why Johnson has to go

Ken Weir went on KGET this week to talk more about why Russell Johnson has to go.

The summary:

“Mr. Johnson is not accountable to anyone at the city, he’s not independent due to his employment relationship, and he doesn’t respect private property rights.”

I'm not sure what accountability to the city would be, except that I thought planning commissioners were supposed to be unaccountable, as in independent.

Johnson is not independent, he said, because he works for Mike Maggard. “He has obligations that lie outside the city.” Doesn't everybody? Certainly Andy Stanley, also a planning commissioner and also an at-will employee of a county supervisor, does.

The private property rights thing is that Johnson voted to take away two-thirds of a man's land. What he's referring to is the property of Gordon Downs, whose land is part of the Canyons project, and who was a client of Weir's until late 2006. Weir insisted Johnson's removal isn't about The Canyons.

Also, the vote was 6-0. Current planning commissioners Ted Blockley, Jeff Tkac and Murray Tragish also voted that way. Blockley and Tragish spoke against Weir at the last council meeting; Tkac was there but didn't speak, he was just there to acknowledge his reappointment by Jacquie Sullivan.

Weir said he accepts that he could be the target of a recall election. “If i have to take some heat for making the right decision, then so be it.”
 

Posted in the News interest group.
Topics: Ken Weir, russell johnson, Bakersfield City Council, planning
posted by citybeat on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 374 times
53 comments from 16 users

1 2

posted by bigqueenkt on May 9, 2008 at 11:21 PM

Lily - The only way I could have gotten that quote wrong is if the PAPER put the WRONG information.  I copy and pasted the quote from the Californian website.  Originally, he was unable to use 2/3 of his land, but then council members changed the ordinance so that he would only lose 5 lots.  Here is the quote that proves they changed it.

"And even though the ordinance's head cheerleader, Councilman Mike Maggard, was able to return most of Downs' lots two weeks ago in a compromise made with a quick sweep of his pen, the developer is "still looking at over a $1 million impact" in lost revenue, says Scott Howry, attorney for Downs and other property holders".

 

 

posted by LilyJo on May 10, 2008 at 05:41 PM

The quote is from Downs/General Holding's attorney- not exactly an unbiased source. I would feel more confident of the quote's accuracy if it came from city planning- guys who are not being paid to spin things. I will check Monday for my own knowledge, but it doesn't really matter- you'll find some other issue to distort/shrilly defend/have only surface understanding of. I can see why the others are no longer responding and I am going to join them.

posted by bigqueenkt on May 10, 2008 at 10:33 PM

Good for you!

1 2

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement