A blog about Politics and News.
About citybeat


Real Name:
Gretchen Wenner
Address:
1707 Eye Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Member Since:
November 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 18, 2009
Profile Views:
1859
Blog Views:
37797
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Wednesday night meeting
Bike riders: Watch for drilling rig on bike path!
Canyons meeting under way... Bldrs Exchange drama...
Recycling wackiness
State's property values decline for first time since 1933...
City seeking applicants for Board of Building Appeals
Homebuilders v. city (and county): Latest buzz
Council, Weds night: development "freeze?"
Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan?
And they're off! City Council seat beckons...
Archives
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download to print on the go with the
City Beat Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


citybeat - > City Beat -> Update on Weir petition
Update on Weir petition

City Clerk Pam McCarthy has rejected the Ken Weir recall petition due to what she called "minor typographical issues." She said they're minor enough that the proponents can pick the petition up tomorrow morning, open whatever word processor they used and get a version back to her quickly. She then legally has 10 days to review it again, but said she doesn't expect to take that long.

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Ken Weir, petition, recall
posted by citybeat on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 at 04:37 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 101 times
3 comments from 2 users

1

posted by citybeat on May 30, 2008 at 04:59 PM

Another update: It was rejected again. Font issues. McCarthy now says she expects them back Monday.

By font issues I mean, the state requires 8-point, but doesn't say what font. It requires a lot of text on the front, and the latest draft had the signature block bumped to the back, which isn't allowed.

posted by OjoReal on Jun 1, 2008 at 08:28 PM

"minor typographical issues" and now "font issues"

Just don't tell me that McCarthy will next bring up any "chad issues."

Is the clock ticking on the petition time-table even though the petitions are not ready yet?

posted by citybeat on Jun 1, 2008 at 10:27 PM

The official clock starts running only when McCarthy certifies the petition form as ready to go. That starts the 120-day timetable.

However, to get it on the November ballot, the proponents would have until about the end of June. If they get a lot of signatures, they could theoretically push it into early July. But the timetable in state law gives McCarthy 30 days to verify the signatures, and then the election can be called by the council no sooner than 88 days before the election. By my quick count, that means it would have to be the July 30 council meeting.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement