|
Wednesday night meeting Bike riders: Watch for drilling rig on bike path! Canyons meeting under way... Bldrs Exchange drama... Recycling wackiness State's property values decline for first time since 1933... City seeking applicants for Board of Building Appeals Homebuilders v. city (and county): Latest buzz Council, Weds night: development "freeze?" Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan? And they're off! City Council seat beckons... November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download to print on the go with the City Beat Printcast.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Westside Parkway speeds up
Bids were so low on the Westside Parkway that Alan Tandy is getting excited about building it faster. Phase I is building Mohawk over the Kern River. Phase II was going to be the parkway itself from Truxtun near 99 to Coffee, but now they're looking at pushing all the way out to Calloway on the next shot, and with an interchange, not an at-grade crossing, at Calloway. Tandy said he wants to be in position for Bakersfield to claim money if Congress decides to stimulate the economy with an infrastructure program. That means having projects ready to go. (Sorry about the quiet these past weeks. I've been posting over on Politics Anyone about the Florez-Gilmore race, which was kind of a big deal.) 3 comments from 2 users
1
posted by
casooner90
on Nov 8, 2008 at 12:31 PM
Personally, I think this is a smart move. The industry is down and there are some great prices. Why not set the contract in place now and lock in prices. This something we need if Bakersfield is going to continue to grow. In fact, I'd really like to see the city planners consider a belt loop instead of driving through the 24th street to get to the other side of the city. Do you have any maps to share? posted by
citybeat
on Nov 8, 2008 at 04:39 PM
They can only lock in prices when they're ready to build. To get to that point, they need to get the design done — and they're accelerating the design process for that very reason. An interior belt loop isn't going to happen. There had been talk about something like that earlier, but it's too expensive, especially when you try to connect it to, you know, other roads. The city is planning on widening 23rd and 24th, though. There's a decent map viewer on the city's freeway site here. posted by
casooner90
on Nov 9, 2008 at 08:23 AM
Thanks for the map link. I agree that the designs needs to be submitted for approval, then go out to bid and then award the winning bid. But, doesn't the city already have several iterations and can't they just have the bidders submit a new bid with revised cost? That will then lock in prices once the bids are approved. I still think the belt way is the answer to our current and future needs. Widening the 24th street is not a good solution considering the traffic on the Rosedale hwy as it is now. The beltway will truly connect all sides of our city and will allow the city to address future growth strategy. Just my thought. Again, thanks for the map and update.
1
Advertisement |