A blog about Politics and News.
About citybeat


Real Name:
Gretchen Wenner
Address:
1707 Eye Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Member Since:
November 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 18, 2009
Profile Views:
1859
Blog Views:
37817
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Wednesday night meeting
Bike riders: Watch for drilling rig on bike path!
Canyons meeting under way... Bldrs Exchange drama...
Recycling wackiness
State's property values decline for first time since 1933...
City seeking applicants for Board of Building Appeals
Homebuilders v. city (and county): Latest buzz
Council, Weds night: development "freeze?"
Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan?
And they're off! City Council seat beckons...
Archives
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download to print on the go with the
City Beat Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


citybeat - > City Beat -> Corporate feud could mean dark channels
Corporate feud could mean dark channels

Just when I get Fox Soccer Channel fixed, it looks like I'm going to lose my Star Trek reruns — and maybe The Daily Show, too.

But as whiny as I can be about my TV, I wouldn't want to explain to my six-year-old why he can't watch iCarly.

Viacom wants more money — they say 23 cents a month per subscriber — for its channels, including Nickelodeonplex, MTVplex, VH1plex, Spike and Comedy Central (which is currently rerun central).

Now, other big corporations own expensive channels — ESPN, owned by Disney, is now at like $4 a subscriber, more than double what it was in the mid-90s — but I haven't heard of them threatening to shut down like this. And Viacom has done this before — I was a Dish Network subscriber when this happened there, and The Daily Show wasn't even in reruns at the time.

So what do you think? Should Time Warner and Bright House pony up the money — and raise your rates? Or should they hold the line and tell Viacom to raise their ad rates?

(Advertising revenue is apparently falling for Viacom, BTW. I'm sure a lot of that is due to the lousy economy, but I suspect that part of it is that many of their networks are targeting people who would rather watch things on the Internet. Where have I heard this story before?)

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by citybeat on Wednesday, December 31, 2008 at 01:31 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 100 times
0 comments from 0 users

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement