A blog about Politics and News.
About citybeat


Real Name:
Gretchen Wenner
Address:
1707 Eye Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Member Since:
November 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 18, 2009
Profile Views:
1859
Blog Views:
37793
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Wednesday night meeting
Bike riders: Watch for drilling rig on bike path!
Canyons meeting under way... Bldrs Exchange drama...
Recycling wackiness
State's property values decline for first time since 1933...
City seeking applicants for Board of Building Appeals
Homebuilders v. city (and county): Latest buzz
Council, Weds night: development "freeze?"
Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan?
And they're off! City Council seat beckons...
Archives
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download to print on the go with the
City Beat Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


citybeat - > City Beat -> Russell Johnson: Dreaming the impossible dream
Russell Johnson: Dreaming the impossible dream

When I called Russell Johnson yesterday to ask if he was going to apply for his Planning Commission seat — you know, the one Councilman Ken Weir tried to kick him off last year, sparking an event that should have been known as the PlanningCommissionpocalypse (or maybe PlanningCommmissiongeddon) — I expected him to laugh and then say no.

He did neither.

I could envision a scenario in which Murray Tragish chose not to pursue a term, and then Harold Hanson chose to appoint Johnson. But Tragish has reapplied, and while I haven't asked Hanson, I would wager a small amount of money that Hanson will reappoint Tragish.

I would also wager a large amount of money that Weir will not appoint Johnson.

I e-mailed Weir late last week to ask whether he's soliciting applications, as opposed to just picking someone from the stack of those who apply of their own volition. He didn't directly answer the question, saying only that he's had a couple of inquiries and referred them to the city clerk's office. I take that to mean no, he's not soliciting for a candidate that will more match him than Johnson.

I'm trying to come up with a word for Johnson's action that's family-friendly. It's not quite chutzpah, because that implies the previous action was Johnson's.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by citybeat on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 at 09:37 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 209 times
6 comments from 6 users

1

posted by LilyJo on Mar 10, 2009 at 03:31 PM

Johnson has been an excellent Planning Commissioner. I hope Weir doesn't play politics for once and chooses to reappoint Johnson. 

posted by reformer on Mar 11, 2009 at 06:54 AM

Maybe Councilman Weir can show us a better side of himself if he reappoints Commissioner Johnson?  Might persuade voters that he isn't as sneaky as we thought.

posted by InTheKnow on Mar 11, 2009 at 08:50 AM

Maybe Weir will give us change we can believe in...and re-elect Johnson who was an excellent commissioner who acted admirably while under fire last year.


posted by DudleyDoright on Mar 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Maybe Councilman Weir should step down and Johnson should run for his seat in 2010...

posted by KeepTrying on Apr 11, 2009 at 07:05 PM

I think that Mr. Weir was right on the money having concerns about Mr. Johnson's  possible conflicts of interest.   Anybody that watched the last Planning Commission  meeting that was held concerning "The Canyons" Project could see that Johnson had/has a hidden agenda concerning that particular project.  Johnson was almost absurd with his redundant questioning of City staff concerning road impacts.  

Johnson finally had to capitulate and vote in favor of the project.  Although Johnson tried and tried to find fault, he finally had to capitulate.  Why is it that none of you  question Mr. Johnson's repeated questioning of City staffs ability to figure road and traffic pattern impacts.  We all pay City staff to be trained and competent in their fields of expertise.  Asking the same question 5 different ways only raises questions about one's ability to grasp simple information.

Why are you afraid of another community member having an opportunity to serve as a planner?

posted by ohreally on Apr 18, 2009 at 10:17 PM

Anyone with a modicum of intelligence watching the December 18, 2008 and April 16, 2009 City Planning Commission hearings for The Canyons project can see Mike Maggard living vicariously through Russell Johnson AND Murray Traggish.  Come on get real.  Johnson and his cohort Traggish are both a disgrace to the Planning Commission.  Politics is for the City Council (you know REAL “elected officials”) NOT for City Council appointments to a “judicial body” like the Planning Commission.  Johnson came to both public hearings with a Mike Maggard agenda: “STICK IT TO THE CANYONS PROJECT.”  In December and April, Johnson argued with the City Traffic Engineer and Project Traffic Engineer; ignored the administrative record, the EIR and traffic impact study regarding Alfred Harrell Highway and Hart Park.  The project representative also pointed out to Johnson that the County Traffic Engineer and the County Roads Department, who raised early concerns regarding traffic impacts to Alfred Harrell Highway and Hart Park, were satisfied with the EIR findings.  He further pointed out that NO ONE from the County bothered to attend the public hearing to support Johnson’s agenda.  NOT good enough for the Omnipotent Johnson.  He is above the technical experts (especially those who the City and County employ as REAL Traffic Engineers).  Hart Park is a part of the Kern River Regional Park, a county maintained and operated facility.  It is NOT a city facility.  The Kern River Regional Park has a service area of one hours drive (per the Metropolitan General Plan).  Did Johnson or Traggish make an issue of Hart Park with the Rio Bravo Ranch project (which, by the way, was on the same agenda on December 18th)?  NO…  The City Council needs to replace Johnson to bring an end to the political shenanigans plaguing the Planning Commission.  Harold Hansen should do the same with regard to Murray Traggish.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement