A blog about Politics and News.
About citybeat


Real Name:
Gretchen Wenner
Address:
1707 Eye Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Member Since:
November 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 18, 2009
Profile Views:
1858
Blog Views:
37784
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Wednesday night meeting
Bike riders: Watch for drilling rig on bike path!
Canyons meeting under way... Bldrs Exchange drama...
Recycling wackiness
State's property values decline for first time since 1933...
City seeking applicants for Board of Building Appeals
Homebuilders v. city (and county): Latest buzz
Council, Weds night: development "freeze?"
Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan?
And they're off! City Council seat beckons...
Archives
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download to print on the go with the
City Beat Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


citybeat - > City Beat -> Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan?
Suing Bakersfield: Pork hits fan?

 As expected, homebuilders are suing the city over traffic impact fees.

 

(Click on the blue box to download a PDF version of the 23-page complaint.)

 

Technical aspects of the state Mitigation Fee Act  form the heart of allegations the program isn't legally sound.

 

The revised fee schedule, for example, is based on traffic/growth projections through 2035, but the city and county's existing metro General Plan — which is supposed to be consistent with the impact fee program — only goes to 2020.

 

Why do you care?

 

The city needs the money to cover matching funds for the Thomas roads money. Some councilmembers have admitted in public meetings that if locals had passed a half-cent sales tax, the fee dispute wouldn't be going on.

 

State law, though, lays out requirements for collecting impact fees specifically so cities and counties DON'T use them as a "special tax" — which requires 2/3s voter approval.

 

If homebuilders successfully torpedo the higher fees? That's a long way off, but it could cut seriously into local general fund dollars.

 

Developing...

 

 

- Gretchen Wenner, staff writer

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by citybeat on Tuesday, August 4, 2009 at 08:08 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 639 times
1 comments from 1 users

1

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Aug 5, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Why are we still building new homes when there are 1 or 2 homes on nearly every street in town for sale?

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement