Every president from FDR has taken vacations and get-aways to work in seclusion. Unless there's been a retraction I don't know of, the president is slated to attend one of the memorial services.  I get the feeling, however, had the president dropped everything and rushed to Ft. Hood, he'd be accused of looking for a photo-op. (As was the case when he was present for returning coffins at 4:00 in the morning.) 

But then, your source is Fox News.

But then, your source is Fox News.  

Is there an untruth up there anywhere?  You are insinuating that the Fox News report of 0bama's schedule is false?  Prove it.  Are you saying that the Fox News report of the Bush's visit is false?  I also included the link to the AP story. 

I would go on and make some snarky comments about illiteracy and lack of education, but I've seen what it makes FreeShoesGraduate look like so I'll refrain.

What amazes me is that no matter how many sources tell the same story, if you use a Fox link the story must be false,  A comment would have a lot more credibility if it just disagreed on it's own merit and not used it as an opportunity to bash Fox.  Especially when it's been run elsewhere.

spam code  LYE XV

I think the point catpaw was making, which is getting lost on the Fox News supporters, is that this is another case of petty partisan nitpicking from the right. That no matter what Obama did for the Veterans Day weekend, the right would find something to criticize, no matter how trivial. It's getting old fast.

And you continually playing interpreter for others comments is also getting old.  They are perfectly capable of speaking for themselves.

It has less to do with Fox supporters than it does with people who won't accept a true story if Fox is attached to it even if the story came off a major news source.

People here have the right to voice their opinion and their displeasure with the president and they shouldn't have to be told they are "petty partisans" by someone who is blatantly partisan.

 Nancy,

" It has less to do with Fox supporters than it does with people who won't accept a true story if Fox is attached to it even if the story came off a major news source."

That's because Fox News is not a credible news source.

That is true.

--virgil 

 ...Dan notes that his predecessor is more sensitive to the situation.

That's a fact from an unbiased reporter?

This guy simply doesn't  care. Unbelievable via Fox. 

Strange. I haven't heard that fact repeated on CNN, HLN, PBS, the networks, or seen it on Time. Why is that?  While you're at it, does Rush have any "facts" worth repeating?

Last month, Fox, the so-called news source,  editorialized in favor of legalizing marijuana.

They gave NORML a half-hour interview, and everything.

--virgil

 ...Dan notes that his predecessor is more sensitive to the situation.

That's a fact from an unbiased reporter?  

The quote you reference isn't even from a Fox report. 

It's a crime scene. He will be there Tuesday. Settle down people.

Marijuana is still illegal, sorry bub!

"Guess what Obama shops at Wal-Mart, pass it on!"

  "Marijuana is still illegal, sorry bub"

Actually, it's not.

--virgil

You nailed it Nancy. Thanks.

Just heard on the news that not only did "o" snub the Ft Hood incident, he got the "shout out" WRONG!!!!!  The Native American he "shouted out" to, was a Medal of AMERICA recipient not the Medal of Honor recipient!! In Fact..............it was "o" who gave the chief the medal!!   OMG!  How embarrassing is THAT?