About dusty1215


Gender:
female
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 11, 2007
Profile Views:
21277
Blog Views:
74768
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Bond's record-setting baseball will go into the HOF with an asterisk.
"distract, delude, amuse and insulate us."
People trust the Democrats more than they trust Republicans.
Are you smarter than the average American? Test your knowledge of the news..
Neo-Nazi's go after the Jena 6
Feds investigating Blackwater USA for weapons smuggling
The death of the History of Civilization…
The good General couldn't accomplish his first job in Iraq, why should we expect anything better out of his second stint there?
Support Debra Bowen's decision regarding Diebold voting machines
Coast Guard's Deepwater project price skyrockets
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
Places on the Web for your Progressive enjoyment.
Its My Right to be Left of the Center
Bring it On!
Sirens Chronicles
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


dusty1215 - > Dusty's View of Life -> Keith Olbermann responds to Newt's recent speeches
Keith Olbermann responds to Newt's recent speeches
The transcript and video of KO's special comment can be seen here.

Amen Keith. If someone thinks they can take our freedoms in the name of fear..they have another think coming. People have died for our right to speak what we think...and Newt be damned.

 


 


Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Politics, Gingrich, Olbermann, freedom of speech
posted by dusty1215 on Thursday, November 30, 2006 at 06:13 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 303 times
41 comments from 7 users

1

posted by mocus1 on Nov 30, 2006 at 09:23 PM
Nice diatribe, Dusty Doofus, and the Islamo-fascists are trying to remove your freedom of speech, women's rights, gay rights, and all the rest of our rights, and who's getting in the way of stopping them?........you and your lamebrain liberal idiots, led by Keith Uber-lib the smirking smear merchant on PMS-NBC !!......just shows what agenda driven clowns you are, eh?
posted by mattloch on Nov 30, 2006 at 10:06 PM
Don't let the "Islamo-facists" remove your freedomm of speech, women's rights, gay rights, etc., etc.! That's OUR job! We're the Republican Party, and we approve of this message.
posted by coochee on Dec 1, 2006 at 01:16 AM
Swoon....I'm gonna marry me that Keith Olbermann
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 1, 2006 at 10:07 AM
It was a very good "diatribe" wasn't it Coo?  Mattloch, perhaps the folks on the right side of the aisle don't mind losing their freedoms, but with the DEMS in control of both houses..that isn't going to happen,right?
posted by mocus1 on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:30 AM
Yes, and I see, so called "protesters" blocked Tom Tancredo from speaking at Michigan State last night.......they were not properly identified as the left wing radicals and intolerant liberals they were by the lamestream media.......now, who is it you were saying is infringing on 1st Amendment rights, Dusty Dorkus?........throwing food and shouting isn't exactly grownup behavior, but since when do gays act like grownups?.......it's liberals who shout down and prevent free speech, but that's what you expect from babies who can't debate in a mature fashion.....they're used to getting their way or throwing a tantrum, like the effin' babies they are........
posted by mocus1 on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:32 AM
so, are you saying you're going to fight Islamofascists to preserve your rights, Dusty?.......so far, we've seen no propensity for you to do so, in fact, we've seen nothing but indifference on your part, even blindness to the threat.......
posted by mocus1 on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:36 AM
can you give an example of Republicans taking away ANY of those rights, Fatt-Kock?.......of course not, you just make it up, like all your garbage, you sissy sodomite..........thanks to Mattloch, AIDS is now the number 3 killer in the world (looks like condoms didn't work, did they?)........too bad the two amoebas who combined to spawn Mattloch didn't use a condom.......
posted by mocus1 on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:37 AM
Hey,coochee, you make Charo look like Albert Einstein..........
posted by mocus1 on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:18 AM
Ah yes Olbermann, the Eichmann of the left wing spin machine........he's like Danny DeVito, only taller and more sober......Countdown, the Spin starts here.......if only Olbermann could get his ratings higher than DeVito's scrotum, maybe you left wing propagandists could get some credibility........
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 03:58 PM
Mocus, how nice to see your flimsy pathetic ravings and personal attacks here. Countdown..just so you know..is seeing an increase in their ratings whilst Bill O's are going down..isn't that grand? :)
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:42 PM
So, if the "Islamo-fascists" have a problem with women's rights, gay rights, free speech and the like...then Mucus is an "Islamo-fascist?"   Or does he just love them for the *DARLING* robes?
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:45 PM
Random..I think Mocus hates everyone. I have never seen a positive comment out of him yet. Or a valid argument either for that matter.
posted by Hardliner4freedom on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:46 PM

I remember he actually complimented the Californian once.

Unfortunately, I can't remember what about.

And once, just once, he actually said something good about my stand on firearms rights.

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:49 PM
Well Hardliner, I agree with your stand on guns and I do own one as well..so shouldn't he compliment me too? :P
posted by Hardliner4freedom on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:51 PM

You're the wrong gender, I'd imagine.

 

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 04:52 PM
What would gender have to do w/it?
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:03 PM
I think he's just pissed that Jared's more famous than he is.  :)
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:09 PM
Moke would be infamous..not famous. Your did make me smirk however..btw..when are they going to fix the time stamps?
posted by Hardliner4freedom on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:11 PM

Dam, Dusty, it must be too early in the morning.

Gender...  Right-wingnut...  Misogynist...  think.  :-)

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:13 PM
lol..there is a nice writeup about KO on Alternet this morning. I am reading it now. I think it has some ratings numbers in it judging by the title.
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:19 PM
Hey MOKE..get a load of this info about KO's "numbers":

Since late August Olbermann's ratings have shot up 55 percent. In November he was named a GQ Man of the Year. When MSNBC teamed him with Chris Matthews to cover the midterms, the network's ratings were up 111 percent from the 2002 election in the coveted 25-to-54 demographic. And certain fifteen-minute segments on Olbermann's show have edged out his nemesis, Bill O'Reilly. (Olbermann deems O'Reilly the "Worst Person in the World" on his popular nightly contest for the newsmaker who's committed the most despicable act of the day.)

I watched MSNBC's election coverage. I was very impressed with it, and it reminded me of the days of Huntley & Brinkley. Matthews and Olbermann played well off each other.
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:31 PM

What's wrong with the time stamps?  Isn't everyone else posting from Kamchatka, like me?

.

Olbermann's numbers show, along the lines of Adlai's old anecdote, that he has the viewership of every thinking American.  Now if only we could get a majority to watch...

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:39 PM
No, I am here in Bako :) Do you ever watch Chris Matthews or Scarbourough? They can really get the pros and con's guests riled up occasionally.
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 05:55 PM
Tweety and Scar?  I try to avoid where possible, although I understand Joe hosted that thoughtful discussion "Is Bush an Idiot?"   
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:00 PM
random, joe is also going crazy over the civil war in Iraq now. He is almost manic about it. He is a hard righty isn't he?
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:21 PM

I'd call him "one of the more thoughtful ones," in the sense that a trained pitbull in a room full of raving rabid dogs is "one of the thoughtful ones."  I've never thought his relationship with his dead aide was adequately explained, either.

.

"Going crazy" as in "admitting things are getting worse," or "blaming Americans and Iraqis for their bad choice of president and invading commander-in-chief?

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:27 PM
I am not aware of his background other than what he mentions from time to time Random. I just started watching him after the elections this Nov.

He is so against the war now..he is foaming at the mouth about the war and Bush's incompetence. He freely admits he supported it..past tense.
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:33 PM

Alas, lots of former supporters are turning against the disaster now.  Too many of them, however, are using the line "good idea, bad execution," when the truth is more like "insane idea, criminally incompetent execution."  Olbermann had one "pundit" as runner-up on Worst Person for trying to blame it on the American people's reaction to Bush's idiocy. 

 

posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:36 PM

Did you happen to see Bush's singular honor in the Washington Post?

http://www.dailykos.com/sto...

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:37 PM
Joe isn't blaming anyone..he just wants to get the hell out. I think he really pushed for them to start calling it a civil war. He has been using the term for almost a month now...which is something for a staunch repube.
posted by TomW on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:41 PM
I think that a lot of these guys are afraid that people will realize that this is what conservatism looks like at its most extreme.  They want to keep cutting government and outsourcing, even though the fruits of that labor are now apparent in Iraq.  They are trying to kick Bush overboard so that he doesn't topple the party for a generation.
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:43 PM
If Bush doesn't get the troops out by the next election..the party is screwed big time.I don't care what the Dem's do...that will be his legacy.Random..his rating as worse pres ever isn't a surprise to you,right?
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:44 PM

Which is why impeachment at this time would be a bad idea.  Never interfere with your opponent's suicide.   If he wants to resign in shame, though, we should take a package deal with Cheney.  Pelosi '07!

.

(Now, impeachment in January 2009 sounds just right...)

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:46 PM
I don't want more dead soldiers random..I don't care about Bush as much as I care about the troops being in the middle of the civil war over there. The pandering to Maliki publicly, while privately they plot his demise doesn't bode well for getting us out of there in the next two years.
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:47 PM
I meant to say..I don't care about impeachment as much as I care about the troops..
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:48 PM

I've been calling him that for a long time.  Shrub wraps up the worst features:

The openness and honesty of Richard Nixon.

The intellectual curiousity of Warren G. Harding.

The business acumen of Herbert Hoover.

The decisive leadership of James Buchanan.

.

But I'll freely admit he's the second-best President we've had since Clinton.  Give him his due.

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 06:55 PM
i will give him nothing. except a hearty good bye and hope you rot in hell when he leaves office.
posted by randomfactor on Dec 2, 2006 at 07:11 PM
We atheists have to push for a more temporal form of punishment, alas.
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 07:25 PM
I would welcome impeachment hearings..if only to have a public forum where evidence of all his underhanded dealings, half-truths and plain out lies would become common knowledge to every citizen of the US.

O btw..I am not atheist either, not that it matters for the subject at hand.
posted by TomW on Dec 2, 2006 at 07:38 PM
I don't support impeachment, yet.  But I do support investigations.  Waxman is going to go through this Presidency and pull out a lot of the rot.  I think that the call for impeachment may come soon, but I'd like to make sure it's not on the first case we try.  In order to make our counrty stronger and avoid repeating these problems, we need to bring all of them to light.
posted by dusty1215 on Dec 2, 2006 at 09:17 PM
Bring the crap out into the light of day..I agree Tom. Not the first thing, but ol Henry will take a hard look, I am sure.
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: