A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
September 05, 2008
Profile Views:
8043
Blog Views:
109458
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Appointments stall, valley air still polluted
Enough already with "pledges"
Focus on educating children
Kern keeps luring film crews
Keep the legal drinking age at 21
We must change the way we think about growth
Labor Day: Save gas, lives
Terrorists targeting researchers
Protect Panorama Park
Ruling protects election system
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Muzzle guzzlers
Muzzle guzzlers
PUBLISHED 7-2-2007

House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi must take steps to ensure that the Senate’s passage of higher fuel-efficiency standards does not run out of gas in her chamber.

By a vote of 65-27, the Senate passed an increase in the corporate average fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks from 25 miles per gallon to 35 miles per gallon by the year 2020.

The vote was a realization of the impacts of global warming, high fuel prices and pressure from states like California to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The problem for the bill is in the House of Representatives.
 
There, Rep. John Dingell, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee wants to make the Senate measure a part of a much larger  bill emphasizing alternative energy and using such things as pollution offsets, incentives for energy-efficient “green buildings” and the like.

It is no coincidence that Dingell wants jurisdiction over the bill. He represents Detroit and has long protected the auto industry. He promises “grand, good bare-knuckle fight” on the fuel economy measure.

Pelosi has the authority as Speaker to bring the Senate bill to a vote on its own, without being buried and amended to nothing as part of a much larger and more complex bill.
We hope she does that, even if it risks the ire of Dingell, who has been an ally of Pelosi’s more often than not.
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 05:07 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 24 times
0 comments from 0 users

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: