A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
October 09, 2008
Profile Views:
8069
Blog Views:
110731
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Those were mighty pricey bricks
Open season on campaign theft
No on Proposition 7
How does Interstate 7 sound?
Quit posturing and get it done
Modified bailout must go forward
Tonight’s debate must go forward
Safety must be top concern
Interior giving away millions
Vote NO on Proposition 2
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Get 17-year-olds involved
Get 17-year-olds involved

PUBLISHED 7/2/08 ----

As any high school government teacher can tell you, civic education is sorely lacking in our schools. For every whiz kid who can recite the U.S. Constitution front to back, there are undoubtedly hundreds who, when asked to describe the 15th Amendment, would opt to take the Fifth instead (if only they knew what it said).


Perhaps as a result, voter turnout among citizens in 18-to-24 age range is grievously low.


Now a state legislator is trying to do something about it. Assemblyman Gene Mullin, D-San Mateo, knows something about civic education, having been a high school government teacher.


His solution: Drop the minimum voting age in California from 18 to 17, with the proviso that the voter must turn 18 by the date of the general election.


Mullin’s proposed state constitutional amendment — not the first time it’s been suggested — would allow 17-year-olds to vote in primaries and special elections if they will turn 18 by the first Tuesday in November of an election year.


Mullin says permitting high school seniors to prepare for their first foray into the voting booth even as they are taking government and economics classes “would heighten the interest in voting and demystify the process,” he told the Associated Press.


Nineteen other states, including virtually the entire Far West (Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada and Arizona) as well as most of the Mid-Atlantic and Rust Belt states, have given 17-year-olds the vote in primaries. And, according to Mullin, all have seen a “pretty significant bump” in voting among 18- to 24-year-olds since they did so.


That only makes sense. Studying one’s government while simultaneously having the chance to actually participate brings the experience to life.


Some will worry that younger voters tend to be more liberal. But as Mullin points out, teens tend to register in the same party as their parents. Only as they grow and mature do young voters find their own way, politically speaking. Learning how the system works by fully participating should only hasten that independence.


And isn’t that what we in this democracy aspire to? A free, independent, informed electorate? If the answer is an unequivocal yes, Californians should endorse Mullin’s proposal.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 78 times
10 comments from 8 users

1

posted by witbee on Jul 2, 2008 at 11:44 AM

Sounds good.

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Jul 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM

"Some will worry that younger voters tend to be more liberal."

 

Gee, I wonder if that would be conservatives that are worried? Usually they tend to want liberals as far from the voting booth as possible. Personally, I think every single person should be voting, and I don't care how they vote. There's just no excuse for not doing your civic duty.

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jul 2, 2008 at 06:01 PM

Maybe they should look at making textbooks more interesting first..

posted by johnburnssucks on Jul 2, 2008 at 06:18 PM

My next door neighbor refuses to register to vote; she says that's how they "nail you" for jury duty (they "nailed" me for next Wednesday).

posted by theColorNine on Jul 2, 2008 at 08:37 PM

Does your next door neighbor drive?  They "nail you" for jury duty if you've got a CA driver's license, too.

 

posted by catpaw on Jul 2, 2008 at 09:34 PM

I thought young voter interest was stirred to record interest by the Obama campaign. Maybe it just takes the right message.

posted by catpaw on Jul 2, 2008 at 09:42 PM

Also, I fail to see the concern. For every whiz kid who recite the Constitution "front to back" I'm sure there are a hundred who could look up the amendments if they wanted to know what they are. Alot of cramming was memorizing facts I forgot as soon as the test was over.

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jul 3, 2008 at 07:08 AM

catpaw - I think the point is that there is quite a bit of apathy when it comes to politics, and it all starts in the youth.  If the youth vote can be improved, then it can have a trickle effect over time, since my generation will one day be the elder generation, as as long as we've kept up on keeping kids educated the right way regarding our government, they'll be less apathetic and more likely to voice their opinions through the voting process.

 

A Democracy can only be as sucessful as the amount of citizens who are invested in it.

posted by AudreyB on Jul 3, 2008 at 07:47 AM

Seventeen year olds are too easily influenced by their teachers, parents and the media to make an informed decision. 

Would they be willing to do the work to familiarize themselves with the candidates and the issues so they can understand what those candidates and issues hope to accomplish? 

This is not meant as a criticism, but teens often form opinions based on what "hot" not whats best.   And they often think they've come to a decision when it's actually a decision that's been fed to them by their friends. 

 

posted by randomfactor on Jul 3, 2008 at 07:51 AM

Seventeen year olds are too easily influenced by their teachers, parents and the media to make an informed decision.  

Kinda like FoxNews viewers.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: