|
Appointments stall, valley air still polluted Enough already with "pledges" Focus on educating children Kern keeps luring film crews Keep the legal drinking age at 21 We must change the way we think about growth Labor Day: Save gas, lives Terrorists targeting researchers Protect Panorama Park Ruling protects election system June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 March 05 February 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Foster kids need net
PUBLISHED 2-1-2007
It’s unsafe for foster children to fend for themselves with no guidance, financial stability or education after they turn 18. Legislation needs to be passed to help these young adults get on their feet and off the streets after they are too old for foster care. Assemblyman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento, and Sen. Carole Migden, D-San Francisco, are introducing legislation for a transitional stipend for foster children. The total cost to the state will be $123 million after five years. The state will save in the long-run by reducing the cost of prison operations and public assistance. The program also will help former foster youth contribute more taxes as a result of higher incomes they will have as productive adults. Now, when foster children reach 18 years of age, they are turned out on their own to fend for themselves. Few 18-year-olds from stable families would be able to take care of themselves at this young age. Foster children who have bounced around homes, and carry emotional and physical scars are even less likely to succeed. Under the proposed legislation, foster children will be transitioned into adulthood. Here’s how the program will work. • Between the ages of 16 and 18, the courts will appoint a guardian for the foster child. The guardian could be the foster parent, or a responsible, qualified adult to teach the child how to manage money and make responsible “adult” decisions. • When foster children turn 18, the state will pay them $850 per month for living expenses, continuing education, job training, etc. The monthly stipend will decrease to $258 per month in the fifth year, when the financial assistance ends. The typical youth will receive about $47,000 over five years. Adjustments will be made to fit the special needs of youths. Legislation that will help keep youth off the streets, develop productive adults and in the end save the state money deserves support. 1 comments from 1 users
1
posted by
Christopherv
on Jan 31, 2007 at 04:19 PM
It is a cold day when I find myself in agreement with two state Democrats, but there is nothing about this plan to argue with. We have programs now for the severely mentally ill leaving foster care that transition them into the adult mental health system. There they are assisted with benefit aquisition and supported through their recovery. We (California taxpayers) and many universities have scholarship programs just for foster children who can somehow manage top SAT scores and grades. But there is virtually nothing to support the preponderance of foster youth in the middle of these two extremes. The guardian financial training component of this is crucial, as is strict adherence to the graduated decreasing payment streams. With those two provisions in tact tens of thousands have a fighting chance at success - and deserve it. I could go on and on...No longer would a foster child HAVE to find shelter with the wrong people, be expolited by others, move back into destrcutive households, and more. With an $850 supplement to a sound education in economics, and an entry level job from which to begin life a sea change in foster care is on the horizon.
Can't say yet that I'd ever vote for one, but the Democrats are dead on with this proposal.
1
Our readers recommend: |