A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
September 05, 2008
Profile Views:
8043
Blog Views:
109462
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Appointments stall, valley air still polluted
Enough already with "pledges"
Focus on educating children
Kern keeps luring film crews
Keep the legal drinking age at 21
We must change the way we think about growth
Labor Day: Save gas, lives
Terrorists targeting researchers
Protect Panorama Park
Ruling protects election system
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Foster kids need net
Foster kids need net
PUBLISHED 2-1-2007

It’s unsafe for foster children to fend for themselves with no guidance, financial stability or education after they turn 18.

Legislation needs to be passed to help these young adults get on their feet and off the streets after they are too old for foster care.

Assemblyman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento, and Sen. Carole Migden, D-San Francisco, are introducing legislation for a transitional stipend for foster children.

The total cost to the state will be $123 million after five years. The state will save in the long-run by reducing the cost of prison operations and public assistance. The program also will help former foster youth contribute more taxes as a result of higher incomes they will have as productive adults.

Now, when foster children reach 18 years of age, they are turned out on their own to fend for themselves. Few 18-year-olds from stable families would be able to take care of themselves at this young age. Foster children who have bounced around homes, and carry emotional and physical scars are even less likely to succeed.

Under the proposed legislation, foster children will be transitioned into adulthood. Here’s how the program will work.

• Between the ages of 16 and 18, the courts will appoint a guardian for the foster child. The guardian could be the foster parent, or a responsible, qualified adult to teach the child how to manage money and make responsible “adult” decisions.

• When foster children turn 18, the state will pay them $850 per month for living expenses, continuing education, job training, etc. The monthly stipend will decrease to $258 per month in the fifth year, when the financial assistance ends.

The typical youth will receive about $47,000 over five years. Adjustments will be made to fit the special needs of youths.

Legislation that will help keep youth off the streets, develop productive adults and in the end save the state money deserves support.
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 at 03:42 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 109 times
1 comments from 1 users

1

posted by Christopherv on Jan 31, 2007 at 04:19 PM

It is a cold day when I find myself in agreement with two state Democrats, but there is nothing about this plan to argue with.  We have programs now for the severely mentally ill leaving foster care that transition them into the adult mental health system.  There they are assisted with benefit aquisition and supported through their recovery. 

We (California taxpayers) and many universities have scholarship programs just for foster children who can somehow manage top SAT scores and grades.

But there is virtually nothing to support the preponderance of foster youth in the middle of these two extremes.  The guardian financial training component of this is crucial, as is strict adherence to the graduated decreasing payment streams.  With those two provisions in tact tens of thousands have a fighting chance at success - and deserve it.

I could go on and on...No longer would a foster child HAVE to find shelter with the wrong people, be expolited by others, move back into destrcutive households, and more.  With an $850 supplement to a sound education in economics, and an entry level job from which to begin life a sea change in foster care is on the horizon.

 

Can't say yet that I'd ever vote for one, but the Democrats are dead on with this proposal.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: