|
Almost perfect presents Look around and be thankful Charities need a break in these tough times A unique way for government to fight blight Schools must cash tech check Adjust system, not just bosses’ salaries City must respect its own history Green jobs can rebuild economy Democrats in power must not overreach Needed: More election staff June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 March 05 February 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Interior giving away millions
PUBLISHED 9/24/08 ---- The inappropriate exchange of money and favors between representatives of the oil industry and the U.S. Department of the Interior led to one of this country’s most memorable scandals.
4 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
drilnliftcrude
on Sep 24, 2008 at 06:44 PM
"Did top company executives instruct any employees to insinuate themselves into “inappropriately close relationships” with Interior officials?" What would possibly give you the idea that "top executives" would whore out employees? Makes one wonder what you would do for a scoop. Come to think of it, you are at times just plain adamant about not revealing sources of news stories. Hopefully, local oil firms will read this editorial and give a long second look before providing anything to this paper. Bill Rintoul is spinning in his grave. posted by
Maggiepoo
on Sep 24, 2008 at 06:47 PM
posted by
editorials
on Sep 25, 2008 at 10:16 AM
Well, drilnliftcrude, this is what would give us the idea: The fact that members of Congress are demanding answers to thse very questions. We didn't make them up -- we're just reporting the specifics of the inquiry. Sorry if that answer is inconvenient. And would we consider whoring ourselves out for a scoop? You mean literally? Do you have any examples of such a thing ever happening? Anything remotely close will suffice. Are you defending big oil companies' alleged practice of whoring as a means to an end? Can't figure out why else you would make such a comparison. As for anonymous sources, that's a rarity at this paper, usually condoned only when a source is at risk of physical or economic harm -- and it relates to this issue how? Bill Rintoul is spinning in his grave all right, but it's not because our editorial condemned the pracfice of sleeping with Intertior Department employees. posted by
drilnliftcrude
on Sep 29, 2008 at 08:31 PM
On page A9 of today's paper, a full page ad of a "community service" of your paper to provide copies of the Californian to school kids had a list of businesses that contributed to your "charity". Conspicuously absent were virtually all local oil companies. So did you write your editorial after they shut you down or did they shut you down after reading your editorial?
1
Advertisement |