A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 08, 2008
Profile Views:
8210
Blog Views:
116733
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Almost perfect presents
Look around and be thankful
Charities need a break in these tough times
A unique way for government to fight blight
Schools must cash tech check
Adjust system, not just bosses’ salaries
City must respect its own history
Green jobs can rebuild economy
Democrats in power must not overreach
Needed: More election staff
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Interior giving away millions
Interior giving away millions

PUBLISHED 9/24/08 ----

The inappropriate exchange of money and favors between representatives of the oil industry and the U.S. Department of the Interior led to one of this country’s most memorable scandals.


Kickbacks and questionable loans from oil executives worth $5 million in today’s dollars led to the downfall and ultimate imprisonment of the Secretary of the Interior in the Teapot Dome scandal of the 1920s. Had President Warren G. Harding not died before the scandal fully revealed itself, he no doubt would have paid dearly at the polls. As it was, the scandal (which prominently involved the Elk Hills oil field near Bakersfield) marred Harding’s legacy irreparably.


But in the context of the battered George W. Bush presidency, a scandal with similar overtones barely rates raised eyebrows.


Officials from the Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service, which oversees collection of billions in annual royalties from oil and natural gas drilling on federal lands, accepted gifts from and had sex with oil company contacts, according to the agency’s inspector general.


Now, Congress is asking representatives of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Chevron Corp. and Gary-Williams Energy Corp. what their top executives knew about gifts and inappropriate relationships with Interior Department officials.


This sort of scandal might be a shock under any other president, but given the Bush administration’s close, longstanding relationship with the oil industry, and its record of dubious governance on many fronts, it’s really just business as usual.


Consider these scandals and improprieties, from the Department of the Interior alone:


•  Former Deputy Interior Secretary Stephen Griles is currently serving time in prison for lying about being the “guy in Interior” who answered to felonious super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff.


• Former Deputy Assistant Secretary Julie MacDonald resigned for “personally reversing scientific findings, changing scientific conclusions to prevent endangered species from receiving protection, removing relevant information from a scientific document, and ordering the Fish and Wildlife Service to adopt her edits,” according to a Union of Concerned Scientists report. She also gave internal documents to oil companies and property rights groups.


• Two Interior Department employees have pleaded guilty in recent days to fixing bids. Most recent was Milton K. Dial, the Minerals Revenue Management division’s former deputy associate director. Dial arranged a contract for a former colleague and then took a job with that colleague within six months of his retirement, a violation of restrictions on such behavior.


• The Interior Department continues to allow two dozen oil companies to produce oil in the Gulf of Mexico without paying billions of dollars in royalties. Among those leading the way: Kerr-McGee, which at one point sought an astounding $28 billion in royalty relief from the government over a five-year period.


And the Interior Department would be in charge of supervising oil companies’ proposed expansion of offshore drilling operations? Scary.


First, we deserve to know more about oil companies’ degree of infiltration into the federal agency that’s supposed to be extracting royalties from this most profitable of industries.


Congress seems prepared to start asking. Rep. Edward J. Markey , D-Mass.,  the chairman of the U.S. House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, wants to know:


• Did senior oil executives know employees were providing gifts to their counterparts at the Department of the Interior?


• Did top company executives instruct any employees to insinuate themselves into “inappropriately close relationships” with Interior officials?


• Did the oil companies set aside money to buy gifts for government employees, or any Bush administration officials?


New, pending legislation orders the Secretary of the Interior to initiate robust ethics training programs and puts in place a strict gift ban for government employees. Worthy of approval? That would seem to be a given.


Royalties are one of the largest sources of revenue for the federal government after taxes. Giving it away in broad daylight is bad enough. Apparently the Interior Department gives it away when the lights go out, too. It’s a sorry new low for the Bush administration.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 01:54 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 38 times
4 comments from 3 users

1

posted by drilnliftcrude on Sep 24, 2008 at 06:44 PM

"Did top company executives instruct any employees to insinuate themselves into “inappropriately close relationships” with Interior officials?" 

What would possibly give you the idea that "top executives" would whore out employees?  Makes one wonder what you would do for a scoop.  Come to think of it, you are at times just plain adamant about not revealing sources of news stories.

Hopefully, local oil firms will read this editorial and give a long second look before providing anything to this paper.  Bill Rintoul is spinning in his grave.

posted by Maggiepoo on Sep 24, 2008 at 06:47 PM

BushCo takes care of it`s own....


posted by editorials on Sep 25, 2008 at 10:16 AM

Well, drilnliftcrude, this is what would give us the idea: The fact that members of Congress are demanding answers to thse very questions. We didn't make them up -- we're just reporting the specifics of the inquiry. Sorry if that answer is inconvenient. And would we consider whoring ourselves out for a scoop? You mean literally? Do you have any examples of such a thing ever happening? Anything remotely close will suffice. Are you defending big oil companies' alleged practice of whoring as a means to an end? Can't figure out why else you would make such a comparison. As for anonymous sources, that's a rarity at this paper, usually condoned only when a source is at risk of physical or economic harm -- and it relates to this issue how?

Bill Rintoul is spinning in his grave all right, but it's not because our editorial condemned the pracfice of sleeping with Intertior Department employees.

posted by drilnliftcrude on Sep 29, 2008 at 08:31 PM

On page A9 of today's paper, a full page ad of a "community service" of your paper to provide copies of the Californian to school kids had a list of businesses that contributed to your "charity".  Conspicuously absent were virtually all local oil companies.  So did you write your editorial after they shut you down or did they shut you down after reading your editorial? 

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement