|
Ombudsman: Budget cuts hurt long-term care Kern's longstanding battle with the mosquito Read the complaint filed against Dr. Freesemann, others Tips to avoid hospital, school infections BPD: Drug cache found in Dr. Freesemann's home, motor home The budget dust settles: How did health programs fare? Prominent doctor arrested in drug investigation British campaign IDs nine types of heavy drinkers The latest budget compromise and health care Bako AIDS Project: $37,000 can go a long way August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 Here's some sites I find useful and interesting: Some fun blogs I like, some health and some random: Got a blog or link to add to this list? Please let me know at ehagedorn@bakersfield.com.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Skin cancer: To screen or not to screen
Mercy Hospitals is hosting an upcoming free skin cancer screening. This event made me think of a recent post, "Health screenings aren't always recommended." It's not that I think screenings aren't helpful, but people need to be aware of the pros and cons of screening. Yes, there are cons. Among them, the chance of false positives, which could lead to spending money on unnecessary follow-ups along with subjecting yourself to unnecessary care that carries its own risks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force develops recommendations for preventive services. They have a somewhat easy-to-navigate guide on screening tests. Here's what they had to say about skin cancer screening: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concludes that the evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routine screening for skin cancer using a total-body skin examination for the early detection of cutaneous melanoma, basal cell cancer or squamous cell skin cancer. Rationale: Evidence is lacking that skin examination by clinicians is effective in reducing mortality or morbidity from skin cancer. The USPSTF could not determine the benefits and harms of periodic skin examination. The task force gave this screening an "I" rating, which means "evidence that the [service] is effective is lacking, of poor quality or conflicting and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined." I'm not saying all this to scare you away from the screening but to give you something to keep in mind. You and your doctor know what's best for you. If you want to go, the skin cancer screening will be from 9 a.m. to noon June 28 at the Florence R. Wheeler Cancer Center, 2215 Truxtun Ave. Call 632-5700 to schedule an appointment. 3 comments from 2 users
1
posted by
TomW
on Jun 18, 2008 at 09:04 PM
Y'all should go in if you have anything you think looks or feels a bit funny. I've got a nice big scar on my cheek from a bit of squamous cell cancer that was cut out. Get'em while they can freeze them, and before they migrate to other less fun places. posted by
NancyII
on Jun 18, 2008 at 09:09 PM
Mine was basal cell...17 stitches under my right eye. Thanks to a great skin doc you can't even see the scar. On a lighter note,...it took out some of the fatty tissue under my eye making it smoother. When I asked the doc if he could do it on the other eye he just grunted "NO." No sense of humor whatever. posted by
TomW
on Jun 18, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Nancy, I had the same experience. My doc was a good surgeon though not an artist. My left cheek looked so svelte for a while there. Only problem was she left a weird bump at the end of the incision that I can still feel a year later. I'd have asked her to do the other side, but I'd have ended up looking like Inigo Montoya.
1
Our readers recommend: |