|
Relay for Life -- Bakersfield a leader Lay off the old people, you NFL bruisers Scratching and rubbing, good feelings Female-only buses in Mexico City, but not Bakersfield A $200,000 ride to space, how nice How healthy are your dogs? Mother gives up newborn to Bakersfield fire station A $2,000 puppy stolen in Oildale How much of a hassle are fog delays? Fog, the thing I like least about Bakersfield July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Officer shooting could have been worse
The officer involved shooting that wounded an unintended victim at a southwest condominium could have been so much worse.
A sleeping Henry Parson, 51, was shot in the ankle as a police bullet penetrated his building. That he or someone else could have been killed is a distinct possibility. Sgt. Jon Scott, thinking he was chasing armed robbery suspects, fired the shots at the driver of a car that wouldn't stop and then tried to run away when the car hit another car in the condo parking lot. Turned out it was a 16-year-old boy who was driving a car taken from the mother of a 13-year-old passenger. Two others, ages 13 and 14, were also in the car at 1 a.m. on a school night. So if the 16-year-old had been hit, he would have been an unarmed teen out for a joy ride. If he had been the actual armed robbery suspect, he could have put someone else's life in danger. None of this would have happened if he stopped the car when police first tried to pull him over. The last time an innocent bystander was struck by a police bullet was Nov. 17, 2000, when a Bakersfield police officer when a car theft suspect drove right at an officer at Allen Road and Rosedale Highway. A stray bullet wounded a man in the Albertson's store. That was ruled justifiable because the lives of the officer and a woman in the car were in grave danger. A shooting review board will determine if Scott's shooting was justifiable. Police can shoot at fleeing felony suspects, such as a robbery suspect, but they have to consider their surroundings when they do. Scott, in his 19-year-career has seven prior shootings dating back to 1994. All have been ruled justifiable. He was the lone officer in four incidents and one of multiple officers firing shots in the other four incidents. Posted by Steve E. Swenson 13 comments from 11 users
1
posted by
Charlie
on Sep 26, 2006 at 11:14 AM
I'd say that Henry Parson just hit the jackpot. This will cost the Bakersfield tax payers plenty. All things taken into consideration probably at least $2 million. I have not doubt that the shooting will be deemed justified in an attempt to dodge responsability. This officer should be requied to spend more time at the range in order to improve his aim. It would help if he hit what he was shooting at in the future.
posted by
anonymous
on Sep 26, 2006 at 12:32 PM
I can tell you right now, send that review Board home, it is a salm dunk just as it has been 7 times before, IN THE LINE OF DUTY!!
But than again this guy learned his marsmanship from a pro Dick Cheney! The shooting review Board or as it is fequently referred to as the shooting confirmation Board's rubber stamp is well worn having been used all but one incident in the last 40 years. But what the hell this is life as it should be, give the guy and extra day of fishing to go along with the usual free bear claw at the "shop". It is kinda of like planet of the apes, "apes don't tell on apes" and " Cops don't tell on cops"!! posted by
goldiloxff
on Sep 26, 2006 at 03:31 PM
I AM CURIOUS why BPD OFFICERS ALWAYS SHOOT AT 'KIDS' THAT ARE RUNNING away .......
posted by
anonymous
on Sep 26, 2006 at 03:39 PM
Shooting them is easier than catching them, heft is a bad thing when you meet a sprinter.
posted by
anonymous
on Sep 27, 2006 at 12:40 PM
It seems these days that the BPD is so eager to shoot and/or arrest. Must be some kind of inferiority complex they have and many become cops simply to feel more "manly." I speak from experience.
Last year when moving into my new apartment, not far from where this incident took place, I was arrested (for the 1st time) because they thought I was someone else. Although I did not resist arrest (cause I already knew they had the wrong guy) one cop was VERY rough with me, throwing me on the ground, not letting me speak, etc. It was scary cause I had all these guns pointed at me, and I personally get nervous around anyone with a gun. There were about 3 police cars and 4 sherriff's cars, and it took them about 20-30 minutes to figure out I wasn't the guy they were looking for (that guy got away cause they were so busy arresting a school teacher with no criminal record whatsoever.) After all that mistaken bullying, the guy who was rough with me gave me a simple "sorry" while walking by. He couldn't even look me in the face. The police get VERY agitated when they find out they've done a no-no, cause it exposes their lack of intelligence. posted by
anonymous
on Sep 27, 2006 at 01:05 PM
My favorite is when you call BPD while a crime is in progress, and you get a call 3 days later to ask if you still want an officer to show up. When we lived in the county, the response time was within minutes, when we moved to the city about 4 years ago, the city's response time can be counted in days. I wish we had a choice to who responds to our calls. If I want somebody shot at and missed, I'll call the city.
posted by
anonymous
on Sep 27, 2006 at 01:46 PM
This guy Scott belongs behind a desk, not behind a gun.
posted by
LeeAnn
on Sep 27, 2006 at 03:03 PM
Kids' are actually capable of killing people . . . . posted by
anonymous
on Sep 27, 2006 at 09:54 PM
I smell bacon, i smell grease, I smell the Bakersfield Police!
lol...always loved that chant posted by
anonymous
on Sep 28, 2006 at 10:33 AM
Hey at least this cop got out of his vehicle, and he was possibly holding his cell phone to his ear when he started shooting. Most of those BPD cops have their windows rolled up and their phone up their ears when driving"???!!!
posted by
anonymous
on Oct 1, 2006 at 06:04 PM
I would LOVE to know why BPD officers all drive around talking on a cell phone can one answer that question?
posted by
CurtDalton
on Oct 15, 2006 at 07:56 AM
The cell phone is used by BPD officers all the time IN THE LINE OF DUTY. I work downtown and the beat cop has given us their personal cell phone number for as long as they have had cell phones - so that we can contact the officer directly - instead of going through dispatch. Whether it's to report someone they are looking for, or to report a crime, the downtown beat officer takes the call on their cell phone and gets the information directly from the downtown merchant cutting three to four minutes off the call. This has resulted in the bad guys getting arrested more times than I can count on Cutting four minutes in getting the information to the officer is the difference between the bad guy getting away or getting caught. The cell phone is also used to communicate with dispatch so that sensitive information is not transmitted over the police band radio - Bad guys LOVE police band scanners and try to buy them in my store all the time. Bad guys and their scanner can't listen in to cell phones and as a result, officers are relying on Cell Phones for communication more and more to keep their conversation private. This is especially important when dealing with sex crimes where the victims privacy has already been violated or in dealing with victims who are children. No one can seriously argue information such as this should be transmitted over the radio for the entertainment of anyone with a scanner. That my friends is why you see officers with cell phones all the time.
posted by
motopoet
on Oct 15, 2006 at 09:47 AM
Do cops sometimes over react to a situation in other cities?...Yes Do cops have the right to use deadly force on fleeing suspects?...Yes Does it matter what their age is...No Am I a cop?...No Do I know any cops?....No While stray rounds hitting bystanders is never acceptible, it DOES happen. If anyone is curious about the standards the boards go by to decide whether a shooting is justified, the guidelines are a matter of public record. There are no secret societies that come to these conclusions. This shooting didn't make the news in Detroit or Memphis, two cities that put this one to shame in police shootings per capita, and theirs don't make the headlines here. I have a hard time believing that county response time is consistently in the ten minute timeframe. It certainly wasn't the couple of times I needed them when I lived in Tehachapi(over 25 years). The BPD DOES have a sorry response time and I had a similar experience as the poster who was called(mine was 3 HRS. later, not days)back to see if they were still needed. I did call in shots fired on 911 in 1994, and withing a couple of minutes, my street was buzzing with cops. I know that everyone think the problem they are having is a priority, but the cops reveive hundreds of calls a day and they have to prioritize. If you call in someone playing their stereo too loud, it will go to the bottom of the list, and that is the same everywhere. Sometimes the Sheriff will respond more quickly because they have a much lighter volume of calls than the city, any city. It may sound cool or funny to some to make fun of cops or call them juvenile names, but if they weren't here at all, we'd all be in real trouble. Anarchy sounds enticing in punk rock music and in "A Clockwork Orange", but most of us would cringe at it its true implications.
1
Our readers recommend: |