|
Royalty in Bakersfield? Who wudda thunk? No on Prop. 98, Yes on 99 Re-elect Mayor Harvey Hall Errea, Mitchell, Brehmer for bench HOW DO WE JUDGE A JUDGE? MATHEW "MATT" BRADY - Westra Seat CHARLES ROBERT "CHIP" BREHMER - Westra Seat FRANK BUTKIEWICZ - Westra Seat MICHAEL RALPH GARDINA - Westra Seat TONY KARL HEIDER - Westra Seat June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 March 05 February 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Like in "Jaws," it's denial
Editorial Page Editor Dianne Hardisty writes about reader response to concerns in the Kern River Valley that Caltrans signs warning visitors not to swim in the Kern River are intimidating and discourage tourism.
Sunday Column July 1, 2007 A friend breathlessly pointed out in a telephone call last week: “It’s like the movie ‘Jaws.’” OK, I responded cautiously, not having the guts to tell him that I had never seen the 1970s box-office-busting thriller. It was just too scary. I love action movies. I’m a “Die Hard” fan. I even sing the praise of the flop “Con Air.” But I can’t sit through Freddy Krueger, chainsaw stuff and man-eating sharks. There, I said it — I’m a chicken. So, I let my friend carry on thinking that I understood the point he was making. And that point was that the whining merchants and tourism boosters in the Kern River Valley were just like the characters in “Jaws.” For those, like me, who didn’t see the 1975 classic movie, “Jaws” was a film about a great white shark that terrorized the resort town of Amity. The local police chief wanted to close the beaches, but the mayor would not allow it because of the potential harm to the town’s tourism during the lucrative Fourth of July weekend. After several shark attacks, the mayor relents and agrees to hire an old, crusty fisherman to take to the high seas to hunt for the shark. To my friend, the objections of Kern River Valley merchants and tourism boosters to the Caltrans’ signs that warn swimmers to stay clear of the treacherous Kern River are similar to the placing-dollars-before-safety reaction of the Amity mayor to the presence of a deadly shark in his seashore resort. On behalf of their business-oriented constituents in the Kern River Valley, Assemblywoman Jean Fuller and Kern County Supervisor Jon McQuiston have come out swinging at state Sen. Dean Florez for convincing the state Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to use its electronic warning signs at the mouth of the canyon and other locations to urge visitors to stay out of the river. The raging waters and undercurrents can be fatal to unsuspecting and unprepared swimmers. Since county officials began counting the bodies in the 1960s, at least 250 people have died in the raging waters of the Kern River. A sign posted at the mouth of the canyon tallies the losses as each body sinks below the surface. For a decade, Californian letter writer Curt Dalton has hammered on Caltrans to use its electronic signs to warn visitors about the dangers. The Californian joined in the effort with its editorials. Sen. Florez finally convinced the governor’s office and Caltrans to get with the program. Beginning with the Memorial Day weekend, the signs began flashing in English and Spanish the warning: 250 dead
stay out of river But Fuller, McQuiston and some in the Kern River Valley now claim the signs are intimidating and may discourage tourism. Like the mayor in Amity, they expressed more concern for tourism dollars than tourism safety. In an editorial last week, The Californian asked readers to suggest “politically correct,” chamber-of-commerce-pleasing wording. While a few of the suggestions were obscene, the following are some from letter writers and bloggers that can be printed: “If you’re going to drown, buy stuff first.” “Stupid? Drunk? Don’t swim.” “Jump in, swim, shop.” “Wet shopper specials.” “I fought the Kern and the Kern won.” “Over 18? No river rescue.” “This is almost like a haiku contest, or some sort of twisted Zen poetry competition,” one blogger noted. “How do you say, ‘Don’t drown,” and make it sound happy (if not downright capitalistic) and do it all in three lines of no more than eight letters?” And another asked, “Why shouldn’t we intimidate the nitwits that want to go into the Kern? If they are dumb enough to ignore the warnings, what else can we do?” Letter writer David Harmon suggested: “Instead of trying to come up with a catchy, politically correct saying to deter people from committing suicide at the public’s expense, just turn off the water during holidays.” Readers likely haven’t helped Kern River Valley merchants and Caltrans officials come up with “acceptable” wording for a non-threatening warning sign that will not intimidate visitors. Perhaps like the mayor of Amity, as the Fourth of July holiday approaches, they will just have to recognize a danger exists and tell visitors the truth: They could die if they jump into the raging Kern River. 6 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
redkernhero
on Jul 1, 2007 at 11:03 AM
What a farce this whole sign controversy has become, and just to please the critiques and provide a politician another photo-op by the Californian who has never met a whiner they did not want to honor as a hero. To feel ignored as Bakersfield has for years because Caltrans who evaluate sign needs after comprehensive studies to consider the affect on all parties did not immediately send them to the front of the line is absurd. Instead of patiently going through the channels and or waging a comprehensive study, they relied on the opinion of a long time envious Cal trans hater and the energy of a high powered politician who lives for media exposure and their own hero creating Editorial Board to force the issue. Now they have found that the world is not ruled bu the little three, the whiner, the heat seeking politician and the failing prominent media outlet in the area. It is time to give the problem back to the professionals who can study the impact on everyone form safety to the tourist industry. This will never happen, even though the tourist industry may not like the results, the whiner who's main interests was to put the fear of god into potential "aliens ' who might swim in the river, those do like Spanish language signs, or even the Californian whose nefarious motives might be exposed. posted by
CurtDalton
on Jul 2, 2007 at 06:49 AM
The above "common-sense" approach brought to you by a mentally unbalanced retired CALTRANS employee. As usual. he has no idea of what is going on or what work has been done. But ignorance of the facts never stopped RedKernCommie from commenting.
Hey Panfilio, do everyone a favor... Why don't YOU go for a swim in the Kern River? It would all be in the name of research. Drink a sixpack of Coors and hop right in! I'll even offer to videotape the entire episode and post it on YouTube. Step up to the plate Panfillio and put your money where your mouth is. The river's not dangerous right?
JUMP INTO THE RIVER PANFILLO AND PROVE ME WRONG!
Cowards like you find it easy to criticize the hard work of others. It requires nothing more than a big mouth and a bad attitude. posted by
NancyII
on Jul 2, 2007 at 08:19 AM
I fail to see what impact the signs will have on Kern Valley tourism. The people who swim the Kern do so in the canyon, not in the valley itself. The signs are in the canyon, not the valley. The people who swim the Kern in the canyon bring their own beer and I seriously doubt many of them travel on up to Bodfish, Isabella, Wofford Heights, or Kernville. I do think it's funny to compare a river with a deadly reputation with a Great White shark attacking people in the water. Comparing it to rough surf or a rip tide maybe...but to a shark? The folks up in the valley need to get a grip. The big tourism draw to Kern Valley is the lake, not the river. The rafting would be the closest thing to the warnings affecting tourism but it's done with a lot of safety precautions and not with an inner tube with no life jacket. That's unlikely to make a dent in the trade with folks with money to spend. posted by
OldBlue56
on Jul 2, 2007 at 08:24 AM
posted by
NancyII
on Jul 2, 2007 at 08:26 AM
posted by
CheshireCat
on Aug 4, 2007 at 02:21 PM
Gee Dalton, I thought you were describing yourself when you said: "It requires nothing more than a big mouth and a bad attitude."
1
Our readers recommend: |