|
Royalty in Bakersfield? Who wudda thunk? No on Prop. 98, Yes on 99 Re-elect Mayor Harvey Hall Errea, Mitchell, Brehmer for bench HOW DO WE JUDGE A JUDGE? MATHEW "MATT" BRADY - Westra Seat CHARLES ROBERT "CHIP" BREHMER - Westra Seat FRANK BUTKIEWICZ - Westra Seat MICHAEL RALPH GARDINA - Westra Seat TONY KARL HEIDER - Westra Seat June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 March 05 February 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Thomas spanks squabbling road planners
By Robert Price, Associate Editorial Page Editor -
One participant called it a “come to Jesus” meeting. Another referred to it as an “ass-chewing.” Virtually everyone agreed that the temperature in the room went up several degrees when Bill Thomas, the retired 14-term congressman from Bakersfield, paid a recent visit to his old district to check on the progress of his millions. Well, not his millions. Ours. The bundle Thomas secured for Kern County from the 2006 federal transportation bill: a windfall of $726 million, give or take, that is ours to spend on long-overdue freeways and other assorted asphalt amenities. All we have to do is come up with a few million in local matching funds and reach some consensus on where and how to spend it all before it evaporates. In other words, cooperate. That part hadn’t been going so well. The various parties with stakes in the proceedings — the County of Kern, the City of Bakersfield, CalTrans, the Kern Council of Governments and others — were, by some accounts, making precious little progress in route-planning. Things reached the critical stage Aug. 20 when the three city representatives on the Joint City/County Transportation Task Force staged a coup of sorts, electing one of their own — Councilman Zack Scrivner — as permanent chairman (rejecting county representatives’ call for a rotating city/county chair arrangement) and then moving to place a higher priority on city road improvements than on regional needs. County committee representatives Ray Watson and Mike Maggard bit their lips and went with the flow. Congressman Kevin McCarthy did not. McCarthy, Thomas’ successor in the 22nd Congressional district, told The Californian’s editorial board the following day that the two competing jurisdictions would need to develop “greater synergy” if the southern valley is to get the most out of the Thomas millions. Thomas might have to get involved personally, he warned. I trembled when I heard those words, and I’m not even on dad’s — er, Thomas’ — “spank list.” At least I don’t think I am. McCarthy and Thomas convened a three-hour meeting of the principal parties Aug. 30 in McCarthy’s office and Thomas, by several accounts, carried on animatedly for the first two. That may be putting it mildly. “He ranted and raved for two hours,” one participant said. “Basically (he asked), ‘What the hell is going on?’” The gist of his message: Stop the squabbling, find common ground and get moving. Bakersfield City Manager Alan Tandy bore the brunt of Thomas’ tirade, some said. Tandy agreed that Thomas was Thomas, pointing out that the retired congressman — once overwhelmingly voted “hottest temper” in the House of Representatives — was never one to tiptoe. Would you characterize him as fiery, Mr. Tandy? “Are you referring to the last 26, 27 years (in office)?” Tandy joked. “Let’s say he was ‘involved.’” Afterward, McCarthy, who played good cop to Thomas’ bad cop, was more interested in talking about the results than the gathering itself. “What happens in the room stays in the room,” said McCarthy, expressing a sentiment that probably explains why attendees were willing only to speak off the record in characterizing the tenor of the meeting. “None of that discussion is healthy. What I look at is the final end result, and the final end result is that we’re moving forward.” A followup meeting Wednesday among just staff folk was said to have been highly productive. People seem to have gotten the message from Thomas (who did not return a call seeking comment). “It was wild to get that much distance (covered) in one meeting,” Craig Pope, director of the county’s roads department, said of the Thomas-led sit-down. “Bill Thomas was able to get us to the same page. He was incredibly powerful. … I’m fired up and I’m sure others are fired up.” He expects to see real progress when the Bakersfield City Council and county Board of Supervisors hold their joint meeting later this month. Others have the same expectations. “I’m very optimistic,” said Ahron Hakimi, a CalTrans engineer who’s assigned to the Thomas Roads Improvement Program task force. “The parties involved are heading in the right direction.” “It’s all good,” agreed David Price, who heads the county’s Resource Management Agency. But what happens if it starts going bad again? “I’m going to continue to come back (from Washington) and have these facilitation meetings,” McCarthy said. “Why not stay on top of it?” And beware. He might bring dad along too. Contact Robert Price at 395-7399 or rprice@bakersfield.com. 9 comments from 7 users
1
posted by
adampayne
on Sep 7, 2007 at 04:30 PM
posted by
emelem
on Sep 7, 2007 at 04:43 PM
Thank you to Thomas and McCarthy for stepping in. After reading about the power play that the City leaders pulled off, and the fact that the County leaders rolled over and allowed it, I was certain that the $$ were not going to be used in the best possible way. Now if these "leaders" can put aside the politics, positioning and pettiness we might have some road relief in the years to come.
Now roll up your sleeves and get to work! posted by
mattloch
on Sep 7, 2007 at 04:44 PM
posted by
tkozy
on Sep 7, 2007 at 06:39 PM
The roads to ghost town developments are no longer needed. And I imagine in the next few weeks the Rosedale Ranch group will be thanking their lucky stars that their development was refused.
½ cent sales tax.. Funny. After houses finish devaluing. Nobodies, buying anything, for a while..
Tax revenues are down around the nation.. The Laffer Curve is proven a joke again.
Instead of roads. Start investing in Bush Jr. Memorial, homeless shelters.
I'll get back with you on how B. Clinton caused this mess. posted by
ronmexico
on Sep 7, 2007 at 06:58 PM
posted by
tkozy
on Sep 7, 2007 at 07:07 PM
Mexico,
News flash.
I guess you didn't listen to the Sultan of the Bush Jr. Goldilocks economy today.
Per Larry Kudlow and his guests:
Latest figures show Tax revenues are down. Instead of job growth we are seeing job elimination. 4000 jobs lost last month.
Expect to see entire developments bankrupt. Not just home owners or speculators. posted by
antiextremism
on Sep 8, 2007 at 02:19 PM
Bill Thomas does one thing for Kern County that doesn't involve a lobbyist, and the local government finds a way to screw the pooch. Classic.
posted by
tkozy
on Sep 8, 2007 at 02:47 PM
Bill Thomas is a lobbyist.
Bill Thomas
Bill Thomas served the 22nd Congressional district of California from 1979 to 2007 Bill Thomas was a Republican member of the United States House of Representatives who represented the 22nd District of California (map) from 1979 to 2007. In February 2007, The Hill reported that Thomas will join the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute as a "visiting fellow." posted by
PJR
on Mar 17, 2008 at 07:05 PM
58 will bring to West park Home Owners (750 homes impacted +-): Increase traffic Disrupt underground water flow The freeway connector would seriously degrade our property value and now is the time to fight to keep that from happening. There are other proposals that would have a smaller environmental impact (fewest homes and businesses lost through eminent domain)Why aren't they being considered? The proposed road would not solve traffic problems, but create more traffic on roads that are beyond their limits as well as increased safety hazards on those roads. The long term effects of this road will end up costing the city more in the long run. I thought this road was to reduce traffic. Who do you think is really pushing for the road improvements- could it be a city law that requires road improvements before homes can be built. One study found that, within five years after a major freeway is built in Other studies in different places show different levels of induced demand, but they generally agree that, within a few years, more than half of the new capacity fills with traffic that would not have existed if the road had not been built. Our neighborhood now is ideal with businesses, schools and parks all with in walking distance. Attractive enough that we enjoy walking, and if we don't build 58 through West park we would leave a healthier global environment to our children and grandchildren. There is nothing free about this freeway. I bet Mr Thomas would not be so quick to approve this 58 project through West Park if his home were located here.
Signed , pjr43
1
Our readers recommend: |