About firedup


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
June 19, 2008
Profile Views:
3973
Blog Views:
37835
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Royalty in Bakersfield? Who wudda thunk?
No on Prop. 98, Yes on 99
Re-elect Mayor Harvey Hall
Errea, Mitchell, Brehmer for bench
HOW DO WE JUDGE A JUDGE?
MATHEW "MATT" BRADY - Westra Seat
CHARLES ROBERT "CHIP" BREHMER - Westra Seat
FRANK BUTKIEWICZ - Westra Seat
MICHAEL RALPH GARDINA - Westra Seat
TONY KARL HEIDER - Westra Seat
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


firedup - > Fired Up! -> Thomas spanks squabbling road planners
Thomas spanks squabbling road planners
By Robert Price, Associate Editorial Page Editor -

One participant called it a “come to Jesus” meeting. Another referred to it as an “ass-chewing.” Virtually everyone agreed that the temperature in the room went up several degrees when Bill Thomas, the retired 14-term congressman from Bakersfield, paid a recent visit to his old district to check on the progress of his millions.

Well, not his millions. Ours. The bundle Thomas secured for Kern County from the 2006 federal transportation bill: a windfall of $726 million, give or take, that is ours to spend on long-overdue freeways and other assorted asphalt amenities. All we have to do is come up with a few million in local matching funds and reach some consensus on where and how to spend it all before it evaporates.

In other words, cooperate. That part hadn’t been going so well.

The various parties with stakes in the proceedings — the County of Kern, the City of Bakersfield, CalTrans, the Kern Council of Governments and others — were, by some accounts, making precious little progress in route-planning.

Things reached the critical stage Aug. 20 when the three city representatives on the Joint City/County Transportation Task Force staged a coup of sorts, electing one of their own — Councilman Zack Scrivner — as permanent chairman (rejecting county representatives’ call for a rotating city/county chair arrangement) and then moving to place a higher priority on city road improvements than on regional needs. County committee representatives Ray Watson and Mike Maggard bit their lips and went with the flow.

Congressman Kevin McCarthy did not. McCarthy, Thomas’ successor in the 22nd Congressional district, told The Californian’s editorial board the following day that the two competing jurisdictions would need to develop “greater synergy” if the southern valley is to get the most out of the Thomas millions. Thomas might have to get involved personally, he warned.

I trembled when I heard those words, and I’m not even on dad’s — er, Thomas’ — “spank list.” At least I don’t think I am.

McCarthy and Thomas convened a three-hour meeting of the principal parties Aug. 30 in McCarthy’s office and Thomas, by several accounts, carried on animatedly for the first two. That may be putting it mildly. “He ranted and raved for two hours,” one participant said. “Basically (he asked), ‘What the hell is going on?’” The gist of his message: Stop the squabbling, find common ground and get moving.

Bakersfield City Manager Alan Tandy bore the brunt of Thomas’ tirade, some said.
Tandy agreed that Thomas was Thomas, pointing out that the retired congressman — once overwhelmingly voted “hottest temper” in the House of Representatives — was never one to tiptoe. Would you characterize him as fiery, Mr. Tandy?

“Are you referring to the last 26, 27 years (in office)?” Tandy joked. “Let’s say he was ‘involved.’”

Afterward, McCarthy, who played good cop to Thomas’ bad cop, was more interested in talking about the results than the gathering itself.

“What happens in the room stays in the room,” said McCarthy, expressing a sentiment that probably explains why attendees were willing only to speak off the record in characterizing the tenor of the meeting. “None of that discussion is healthy. What I look at is the final end result, and the final end result is that we’re moving forward.”

A followup meeting Wednesday among just staff folk was said to have been highly productive. People seem to have gotten the message from Thomas (who did not return a call seeking comment).

“It was wild to get that much distance (covered) in one meeting,” Craig Pope, director of the county’s roads department, said of the Thomas-led sit-down.  “Bill Thomas was able to get us to the same page. He was incredibly powerful. … I’m fired up and I’m sure others are fired up.”

He expects to see real progress when the Bakersfield City Council and county Board of Supervisors hold their joint meeting later this month. Others have the same expectations.

“I’m very optimistic,” said Ahron Hakimi, a CalTrans engineer who’s assigned to the Thomas Roads Improvement Program task force. “The parties involved are heading in the right direction.”

“It’s all good,” agreed David Price, who heads the county’s Resource Management Agency.

But what happens if it starts going bad again?

“I’m going to continue to come back (from Washington) and have these facilitation meetings,” McCarthy said. “Why not stay on top of it?”

And beware. He might bring dad along too.

Contact Robert Price at 395-7399 or rprice@bakersfield.com.
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by firedup on Friday, September 7, 2007 at 03:47 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 353 times
9 comments from 7 users

1

posted by adampayne on Sep 7, 2007 at 04:30 PM
Thank you very much for the update on this critical issue. It is good to see Bill Thomas invested in getting the work started on the road improvements here in the county. It is also good to see the local obstructionists and political hacks brought to task for their ineptitude in getting anything accomplished regarding the funding. If all that firepower had been in evidence for the road measure sales tax initiative in the first place the county would not be looked upon as such a joke to the rest of the state.
posted by emelem on Sep 7, 2007 at 04:43 PM
Thank you to Thomas and McCarthy for stepping in. After reading about the power play that the City leaders pulled off, and the fact that the County leaders rolled over and allowed it, I was certain that the $$ were not going to be used in the best possible way. Now if these "leaders" can put aside the politics, positioning and pettiness we might have some road relief in the years to come.

Now roll up your sleeves and get to work!
posted by mattloch on Sep 7, 2007 at 04:44 PM
Short of ripping off the heads of the city's reps in order to **** down their necks, does anybody honestly believe that the city will bring "greater synergy" to the process? The stage is now set for them to push for the 1/2-cent tax bump in order to bring the vast majority of money to the metro area under the guise of "county-wide improvements". They are making a mockery of the Joint Task Force, and will use it as cover for distributing the money to cover their own shameful decades-long short-changing of transportation issues. They've bullied themselves into charge of the task force, and will use it as political cover for their funding grab. At this point the only option (sinced armed insurrection has gone out of vogue these days) would be the removal of the city reps from office, and replacement with more magnanimous members.
posted by tkozy on Sep 7, 2007 at 06:39 PM
 

The roads to ghost town developments are no longer needed. And I imagine in the next few weeks the Rosedale Ranch group will be thanking their lucky stars that their development was refused.


½ cent sales tax.. Funny. After houses finish devaluing. Nobodies, buying anything, for a while..


Tax revenues are down around the nation.. The Laffer Curve is proven a joke again.


Instead of roads. Start investing in Bush Jr. Memorial, homeless shelters.


I'll get back with you on how B. Clinton caused this mess.

posted by ronmexico on Sep 7, 2007 at 06:58 PM

Tax revenues are down around the nation..

Wrong again, liar...

posted by tkozy on Sep 7, 2007 at 07:07 PM
 

Mexico,



News flash.



I guess you didn't listen to the Sultan of the Bush Jr. Goldilocks economy today.



Per Larry Kudlow and his guests:



Latest figures show Tax revenues are down. Instead of job growth we are seeing job elimination. 4000 jobs lost last month.



Expect to see entire developments bankrupt. Not just home owners or speculators.

posted by antiextremism on Sep 8, 2007 at 02:19 PM
Bill Thomas does one thing for Kern County that doesn't involve a lobbyist, and the local government finds a way to screw the pooch. Classic.
posted by tkozy on Sep 8, 2007 at 02:47 PM
 

Bill Thomas is a lobbyist.


Bill Thomas

From SourceWatch


Bill Thomas served the 22nd Congressional district of California from 1979 to 2007

Bill Thomas was a Republican member of the United States House of Representatives who represented the 22nd District of California (map) from 1979 to 2007. In February 2007, The Hill reported that Thomas will join the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute as a "visiting fellow."

posted by PJR on Mar 17, 2008 at 07:05 PM

 

 

 58 will bring to West park Home Owners (750 homes impacted +-):
Noise
Trash
 Air pollution
Endanger Children, Wildlife, Water quality 

Increase traffic
Degraded property value

Disrupt underground water flow

 

The freeway connector would seriously degrade our property value and now is the time to fight to keep that from happening. There are other proposals that would have a smaller environmental impact (fewest homes and businesses lost through eminent domain)Why aren't they being considered? The proposed road would not solve traffic problems, but create more traffic on roads that are beyond their limits as well as increased safety hazards on those roads. The long term effects of this road will end up costing the city more in the long run. I thought this road was to reduce traffic. Who do you think is really pushing for the road improvements- could it be a city law that requires road improvements before homes can be built. One study found that, within five years after a major freeway is built in California, 95 percent of the new road capacity fills up with traffic that would not have existed if the freeway had not been built.

Other studies in different places show different levels of induced demand, but they generally agree that, within a few years, more than half of the new capacity fills with traffic that would not have existed if the road had not been built.

Our neighborhood now is ideal with businesses, schools and parks all with in walking distance. Attractive enough that we enjoy walking, and if we don't build 58 through West park we would leave a healthier global environment to our children and grandchildren. There is nothing free about this freeway.

I bet  Mr Thomas would not be so quick to approve this 58 project through West Park if his home were located here.

 

Signed , 

pjr43

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: