|
We apologize for the inconvenience - Bakomatic sites now back up Site problems on Thursday afternoon Stuff and things... When parody crosses the line to inappropriate... Early Morning Site Issues The Great Profile Photo Debate Say hello to your Personal Inbox! Blog Categorization: "Interest Groups" in live beta - We need your help! Is "online community" an oxymoron? Testing, testing, 1 2 3... November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Polling the Polls
Yesterday blogger Erik Bako posted a critique of the daily reader's poll that appears at the bottom of the Bakersfield.com homepage. His main criticism was of the often tongue-in-cheekish text that accompanies the “yes,” “no,” and “maybe” choices, and he was concerned that poll participants could be forced to make a false choice, or not participate at all. Why, he wondered, couldn’t readers supply their own rationales behind their answers? I spoke with our web editors in the newsroom here, who choose a poll topic at their daily news meeting and are charged with writing a poll question for the following day. The daily reader’s poll has been on the Californian’s website for years, and was one of our first interactive features to solicit reader feedback. In a world of blogs and other internet-based venues for the expression of personal opinion, today’s reader’s poll is produced purely for entertainment value. As such, the wording that follows your affirmative or negative answer choices is chosen with that in mind. The web editors have gone back and forth between concise and wordy, and seeing no effect on the level of participation either way, have decided to err on the side of fun and lively versus dry and boring. The occasional complaint comes in from a reader whose opinion wasn’t included, but such is the nature of this kind of polling, which collects data from a limited number of diametrically opposed choices. Again, we could reduce the answer choices to a straight “yes,” “no,” and “maybe,” thus avoiding the issue, but the web editors take the risk in the name of producing an interesting poll question that more readers will stop to answer. The nature of the polling software again precludes “write-in” answers—but that’s the beauty of the Bakersfield.com blogging community. Anyone can write their mind on the topics s/he cares about, and anyone can comment, respond, agree, disagree. Multiple venues for multiple ways of participating in this community and contributing to civil discourse and debate—that’s what Bakersfield.com is all about. So, what do you think about the homepage polls? Here, you don’t have to stick with “good,” “bad,” or “indifferent”—tell me what you think, and why, and I’ll make sure your thoughts get read by the people who want to know what you’re thinking. 3 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
marsh
on Nov 13, 2006 at 08:05 PM
There’s no replacement for critical thinking skills. Anyone who has taken stats knows, polls are never 100% accurate, but a well done poll can give some reasonable idea of people’s attitudes. The polls on websites such as here, and even CNN.com are more or less, for entertainment only. I imagine the websites use them to gauge the popular opinion of the site’s visitors and literally to entertain, but nothing more. As for Erik Bako, one must be always on their alert, he is very intelligent, fond of satire, and his comments are almost always tongue-in-cheek. Always make a point to read between the lines when reading his posts! Marshall Neal posted by
adampayne
on Nov 14, 2006 at 07:06 AM
posted by
anonymous
on Nov 14, 2006 at 01:40 PM
Geez I have company! A fellow commie, pinko, liberal ACLU hating kind of guy.....we will rule the world!!
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |