|
Obama's new campaign commerical and more Convention's 2.0 Obama v McCain 5pm (pst), internet connection Congressman McCarthy's voting record for 2007-08 Pro-abortion, anti-gun's, Moderate, Kevin McCarthy ??? Saakashvili, $cheunemann, McCain and Russia What do you Obama supporters think, is it Wes Clark for VP? Iowa already looks out of reach for McCain, this won't help. Fan of FiveThirtyEight blog? Ron Suskind's "The Way of the World" July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 U. S. Constitution
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Marylee v. Juror #309
Marylee offered up a column, in which she wrote that the juror member, known as #309, (of the Brothers trial), perhaps took his cue to basically recluse himself from serving on the jury, from the “...Rev. Jesse Jackson, who, after learning last year that a black stripper had accused Duke University lacrosse players of rape, promised to pay her college tuition whether her story proved true or not. The fact is that Jackson told The Associated Press that his organization is committed to making sure the 27-year-old divorced mother of two will never again "have to stoop that low to survive." Maybe, Marylee has something, both, were kind acts. The woman was stripping for money, I hear stripping pays pretty well, but I guess Jesse felt that if she had this help from his “Rainbow/Push Coalition,” which he offered, would offer her more choices, and a better chance of “making something” of herself. A hand up, if you will. When the jurist decided to go and discuss the inner turmoil he was in (he later described it as being an 'no-win situation', one where he would have to choose between either selling a brother down the river or letting a letting a murderer get away.”
Let’s try a hypothetical theory, and consider that#309 was asking for a hand up, let’s say at the begining of the trial, he found himself seated on the panel, believing that he would be fair; but he wouldn’t let the jury convict a man just for being ‘black on trial’. But, things get ugly, and soon every time he looks at Brother, he sees, a black man. A black man who, has become covered in the blood of his own family; and #309, looks over at Brothers, again and sees only red. He can’t look at Brothers anymore, so he goes up to a co-jurist, but it had to be one, that #309 respected, and believed would make a good leader, for the panel after #309s was gone. After a little chit-chat, #309, asks the other jurist to, ‘help me, I have to get out of that bloody mess’ going on in the courtroom, and then he spills out his guts. When called into the Judge's chambers, #309 doesn't lie and say that he has already made up his mind, and he doesn't deny the other jury members accusations. He is freed to go home and try to forget the whole thing ever happened, and then, now freed to read the whole paper again, reads Marylee's column, and cries. I think both the Rainbow Coalition and Juror #309 both, did a good thing. Marylee did a bad thing, but then as Marcella McMahon wrote, "The true test of a persons importance is not what he has, but how she treats the souls around him. 5 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
montfred
on Jun 4, 2007 at 10:42 AM
posted by
anonymous
on Jun 4, 2007 at 10:20 AM
Pan, you do a disservice to your own cause. You want to fight racism with racism. Get over it. You weren't qualified to get any position other than picking up trash along the freeway. It's not racism that held you back, it's your incessant whining.
posted by
OldBlue56
on Jun 3, 2007 at 04:02 PM
posted by
redkernhero
on Jun 3, 2007 at 02:14 PM
Your excuse is no better than Marylee's, but it fits my views. White jurors s we all know are , honest objective an without a racist bone in their bodies, especially those from eastern Kern County and these from Bakersfield and west of 99.
And you simply cannot blame the white jurors for finking, that is what they are supposed to do in a kKern county case involving a Black juror, and we all praise them for that. As for the judge, his informant probably did not get enough credit for being a super snitch, every judge should have at least one. This is not to criticize Kern Justice as white people we are entitled to all the advantages to prove how much better we are than Blacks. The only bothersome thing about this case is that the jury did not tale enough time to do their duty, it made it looked contrived and preordained, which we all know is not true, but than may be the had trouble with the judges instructions about there not being any reasonable doubt in this case, it was a plain case of just hang the scalp on the wall. God we are fair!! posted by
possummomma
on Jun 3, 2007 at 01:56 PM
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |