A blog about News.
About noholdsbarred


Member Since:
August 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
3869
Blog Views:
103247
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Statement by CARB board member
Lies and cover ups tarnish California Air Resources Board
Strange encounter ends in arrest
PG&E smartmeters WILL be tested
Suspcious guy at my door last night
Adoption day "magical"
Closing courts wrong approach
Wars never end for veterans
Pet adoption day in Tehachapi Nov. 21
Indian casino OK with me
Archives
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


noholdsbarred - > No holds barred -> Movement on the river
Movement on the river

We may be one step closer to getting water back in the Kern River.

The State Water Resources Control board has set a hearing for Oct. 26-28 to hear testimony and sift through evidence about whether as much as 120,000 acre feet of river water is up for grabs after a water district was found to have forfeited it in 2007.

The city has argued that the water is out there for the taking and they want it to run down the river.

Imagine! A river in our river bed!

“This is the first stage of a two-stage process,” said Florn Core, Bakersfield’s water resources director.

This hearing will be very technical as the city and several water districts argue the fine legal points of whether unappropriated water is truly available.

Core said he feels the city has a strong case because during a 12-year-long legal battle over this very water, several lower courts found it was available, but the final decision had to be made by the Water Resources Control board.

At least four water districts and the city of Shafter have argued there is no unappropriated water. They’ve also said if the board finds there is some water up for grabs, they should have it for homes and businesses and irrigation.

I agree with the city that the river, and the citizens, should get that water for recreation, to restore the natural habitat surrounding the river bed and to replenish the aquifer.

I’ve encouraged people to write to the board in support of the city’s position. This upcoming phase is much more technical than simply saying “I want a river!”

But it still couldn’t hurt to send a note reminding the hearing officer that A) you want any unappropriated water back in the river and B) you’re watching this process closely.

If — big IF — the officer rules there is available water, then we’ll need a full frontal assault in support of getting that water back into the river. That’s still a ways down the road.

For now, keep your powder dry and cross your fingers.

 

SUPPORT THE RIVER!

If you’d like to send a comment in support of the city of Bakersfield’s petition and application write to:
State Water Resources Control Board
Division of Water Rights
RE: Kern River
1001 I Street, 14th Floor
P.O. Box 2000
Sacramento, CA 95812-2000
High points to hit:
State your support for Bakersfield’s position that there is unappropriated water in the Kern and that it should be run down the river to:
• Ensure Kern River water stays in Kern County.
• Protect and maintain the quality of our drinking water.
• Preserve river habitat.
• Enhance recreational opportunities.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by noholdsbarred on Friday, July 24, 2009 at 01:57 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 955 times
12 comments from 9 users

1

posted by brianparks on Jul 24, 2009 at 03:26 PM

I'm not a water expert but I know that living in a desert or 'semi-arid' area as we do plentiful water is not supposed to be natural to this area. On the other hand I remember from, was it the forth grade?, that Captain Baker had to drain the swamp so he could have a field that became this town. It makes sense since the Kern is a fairly big river with no outlet to the ocean. 

This all happened before over half a million people, a couple million acres of farming and lots of industry.

I remember fondly when there was water in the river at beach park every summer. It really does add a bit to the sense of quality of life here. It is unfortunate that more practical factors must prevail. While our farmers have on the whole cheaper access to water than farmers anywhere on earth we all benefit from this due the the thriving agri-business in Kern County. Any surplus of water exists only on paper. We are in the middle of a multi year drought. If the population or the business community doesn't need water that is in the reservoir this year we will need it next year. I also remember years when we couldn't even wash our cars or water our lawns. 

If you really think about it except for beach park and oildale, where do we really see the river anyway? Habitat is one thing, a few billion mosquitoes is another. The only pressing need for water in the lower river is to replenish the aquifer. Since that is not taken seriously, or the salinization of the land problem either, farmland will soon disappear as will much of the population. Then there will be enough water to go wading under the bridge at 24th st.

posted by sagefever on Jul 24, 2009 at 03:44 PM

"The only pressing need for water in the lower river is to replenish the aquifer. "

That is the question that we need to look to.

posted by siouxcityranch on Jul 24, 2009 at 05:32 PM

water in the river ?? yup we need more west nile skeeters...might help cut back on the population explosion we have been having..not to mention people will be leaving in droves once the epidemic gets started...sure be the answer to our water shortage problems..

us old farts too settled in to move out of the area will just have to purchase our cans of OFF by the truck load and make sure the screens are on tight.....hell whats another year or two more or less of life in this heat..

fyi avon skin so soft works pretty good too..

posted by Shwaine on Jul 24, 2009 at 08:48 PM

Brian, the desert is on the other side of the mountains. As you pointed out, Bakersfield is swamp-land historically.

posted by Shwaine on Jul 24, 2009 at 09:23 PM

Swamp, bog, wetland... call it what you will (and most people don't care about the Koeppen climate scale). Point is if it weren't for the dams and weirs, no one would be calling this area a desert. It would still be hot with low precipitation, but not a desert like the Mojave. Also, should I point out that certain areas of Hawaii are also rated BSh (hot semi-arid steppe) on the Koeppen scale yet no one is calling it a desert either?

posted by maybelline on Jul 24, 2009 at 09:25 PM

Interesting opinions.  I'll be watching to see how the experts comment on this subject and if they line up with the water powers.

posted by NancyII on Jul 24, 2009 at 10:27 PM

If you want to see pictures of how it used to be here bo to my new blog.  I have a book with a picture of a flood in Bakersfield but it didn't  scan well.  Besides, that wold be a copyright infringement.  (cough)

posted by Shwaine on Jul 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM

How very nice for you Observer. Most people NOT in your field really don't care about the climate scale though. And Bakersfield hugs the Kern River. If not for the weirs and the dam, there'd be whole areas of the city up to their proverbial ankles in water. It might be BWh on the scale, but I'm not talking about climate scales. I'm talking about what the common man would use to describe the area as it was before the Europeans came and reclaimed it. "Desert" would not exactly be the first label that would spring to mind to the common man upon seeing Bakersfield as it was. "Marsh", "swamp", "bog" and so forth however would be. It might not jive with your scientific scale, but that's your issue, not mine.

Also, there is no C in my name.

posted by BILLIONAIREBARTLEY on Jul 25, 2009 at 04:49 AM

Yeah, release the water and give those illegals a place to bathe and swim for the love of God!

Someone turned off my favorite shower on the bike path between Yokuts Park and Gosford :(  Me and a lot of my homeless friends used that to rinse off after we received our entitlements, celebrated with some Cobra beer and peed ourselves because they don't provide proper toilets on the riverbed.  Oh, the humanity!

posted by JKeyes on Jul 25, 2009 at 08:42 AM
How can Bakersfield have water ? What about the fish? Look at the salmon; they used to be here in the early 1400's. What about the Delta Smelt they were never here, but have now stopped farming in the San Joaquin Valley. What about the three remaining Condors; don't they need water? Bakersfield you have a lot audacity to think humans should be entitiled to water. Just like some of Us think that a forest should be healthy. :-)
posted by CheshireCat on Jul 25, 2009 at 01:04 PM

The dam at Lake Isabella was constructed by the Army Corps of Engineers primarily as a flood control project.  Spring floods were rather common in the Bakersfield area prior to it's construction.  Certainly we had water in the Kern River then. LOL

posted by maybelline on Jul 26, 2009 at 07:55 PM

Doesn't seem like many are interested in this topic as evidenced with the lack of comments.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement