|
Fuller likely to run for state Senate Costa, undecided on health care, negotiating for Valley McCarthy to appear on CNN Parra vs. Florez: It's on! McCarthy draws criticism from conservative wing Fuller offers up Assembly-R's water bill.... Rubio might have an opponent Pete Parra: Why he might - and might not - run Protect Marriage: Ban Divorce Danny Gilmore just saying no? May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download a PDF to print on the go with the Politics, Anyone Printcast.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
A few thoughts before I say goodbye
| Wednesday, Jul 4 2007 10:20 PMLast Updated: Thursday, Jul 5 2007 7:27 AM SACRAMENTO -- Sadly, I have to report that this is the last one of these columns. It may reappear at some point in a different form, but my role as The Californian's Sacramento reporter will end next week. As you may have noticed in a story we published last week, The Californian is closing the Sacramento reporting office for financial reasons. This company joins a long and growing list of newspapers forced to make painful cuts under the relentless changes in the economics of the modern media world. I am disappointed but not surprised, and I count myself lucky for many reasons. An alarming number of my colleagues in the Sacramento press corps have preceded me into other lines of work and other phases in their lives. That this office lasted so long is a tribute to the commitment of the owners and editors of The Californian to providing readers and voters in Kern County with a steady flow of information about the impact of state government on their lives. It's expensive to maintain a remote office 300 miles away from Bakersfield. The paper has been represented by someone in Sacramento most of the time since 1970. Its first correspondent here was Mary K. Shell. Yes, Mary K. Shell, who went on to become mayor of Bakersfield and a Kern County supervisor. "That was before we even had fax machines," Shell recalled the other day. She wrote a weekly column on a typewriter and shipped it to Bakersfield on a Greyhound bus. That went on until 1979, when she decided to run for mayor and moved back to Bakersfield. In 1982, the paper sent Bruce Scheidt, then a young reporter in the newsroom, to become a full-time reporter covering state government and politics. Scheidt, who spent his nights and weekends studying law, left in 1989 to become an attorney. Scheidt was followed by Mike Otten, a former Sacramento Union reporter, and Lois Henry, now the paper's assistant managing editor. I came to work for The Californian in 1994. Although I had spent part of my youth in Bakersfield, graduating from Arvin High and attending Bakersfield College, I was no stranger to Sacramento. I had been a reporter here for most of the time since 1973, working for several newspapers owned by the Gannett Co. When I arrived, Ronald Reagan was governor and Jerry Brown was running to succeed him. Now, I plan to take some time off, and then see what might come next. I don't plan to write a book, but at a time like this, it's impossible not to think about what you've learned. In more than three decades of watching state government up close, with a fair amount of national reporting thrown in, the lesson can be summed up in one word: VOTE. It sounds corny, but when you get down to the basics of what this country is all about, that's it. It's increasingly fashionable to say one's vote doesn't count, that all politicians are on the take, that the big-money interests will always get what they want anyway. But remember this: If just a few more people, relatively speaking, had voted for Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore in either Tennessee or Florida in 2000, we almost certainly would not have the war in Iraq that has become so unpopular. The lesson is, you can't always tell in advance how much influence your vote will have. But when it turns out that you could have helped fix something bad, and you didn't try, it's too late. 11 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
steveeswenson
on Jul 5, 2007 at 09:21 AM
You did a great job for us. Thank you. Plus the donuts you brought us were legendary. You deserve some time off to try to catch one of those stupid smelt fish that some people worry about. posted by
mildmannered1
on Jul 5, 2007 at 09:34 AM
posted by
TomW
on Jul 5, 2007 at 09:43 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jul 5, 2007 at 09:44 AM
I always thought you wrote good stuff, too. The other thing that I tire of hearing is that "there is no difference between the parties." That couldn't be more untrue. Say that the next time a vote in Congress or Sacramento splits exactly on party lines -- which is dam near every time they vote on something.
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jul 5, 2007 at 09:45 AM
posted by
mattloch
on Jul 5, 2007 at 09:49 AM
posted by
TomW
on Jul 5, 2007 at 09:52 AM
posted by
adampayne
on Jul 5, 2007 at 10:36 AM
It is, as you point out, a fact that newspapers are now cutting staff amid declining ad revenues. It is also a fact that newspaper publishing, like so many industries, has been reduced through merger, buyout and liquidation to a handful of major players dominating the landscape with fewer alternative sources to supply information. When very few companies become your sole source of revenue the model breaks and people are left without important voices to point out what happens in their communities. Good luck to you. As a card carrying member of the AARP eligible I know you'll need it. posted by
robbwillis
on Jul 5, 2007 at 11:01 AM
posted by
dusty1215
on Jul 5, 2007 at 11:12 AM
posted by
sagefever
on Jul 5, 2007 at 11:50 AM
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS: |