A blog about Politics, News, and Kern County.
About politicsanyone


Member Since:
May 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 17, 2009
Profile Views:
1849
Blog Views:
100660
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Jagels' retirement profiled by AP
Behind the scenes of the UC Merced deal: Politico
Coffeehouse brings Florez, Parras together
$500 million for UC Merced: Costa and Cardoza's "ask" in health care bill
Costa: "yes" vote begets UC Merced med school
Fuller likely to run for state Senate
Costa, undecided on health care, negotiating for Valley
McCarthy to appear on CNN
Parra vs. Florez: It's on!
McCarthy draws criticism from conservative wing
Archives
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
E-mail & Print
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download a PDF to print on the go with the Politics, Anyone Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


politicsanyone - > Politics, anyone? -> Demographics, parks and money
Demographics, parks and money
I read the draft Bakersfield Recreation and Parks Master Plan this week. Here's an interesting thing I found in it: Those willing to support paying for parks are more likely to be young, Hispanic and have kids; those who don't are old, white and either childless or have grown children.

"Residents polled most often stated they are somewhat or definitely against the development fee increase proposal (55%). The greatest levels of support for the proposal were noted among respondents reporting a household head less than 40 years (53% somewhat/definitely support vs. 40% among remaining respondents); among respondents describing themselves as Hispanic (53% vs. 42% among those described as White); and among households with children less than 18 years (49% vs. 40% among those with none)."

You can download the whole report at http://www.bakersfieldcity....


Posted in these Groups:
Topics: demographics, impact fees, parks
posted by politicsanyone on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 03:46 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 90 times
6 comments from 5 users

1

posted by creepycat on Oct 11, 2007 at 10:46 AM

Sad commentary about the old folks. My kid is a h.s. senior, already submitting college applications, and after graduation will likely leave home. I did my job, why should I have to pay for somebody elses brat to have a park?

When I think of the times that her mother or I took our youngster to a nearby neighborhood park it's hard for me to deny the quality time and childhood development to any young parent or child. I'm sure at the time there was a senior resentful for "paying" for my kid's swing and slide. Mellow, old people. Parks are not for kids only. You can get off your couch and walk or ride a bike in a park too.

Yeah, I know, taxes are a pain. When are they not? But chipping in for a park--I don't mind passing on the favor.  

posted by mattloch on Oct 11, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Of course, higher fees are only a small portion of the problem. A city unwilling to require developers to set aside area for parks makes it much more expensive to acquire land and develop a park once the development is in (and property values are so much higher). The city should also stop permitting developers to re-zone areas designated for parks and other public uses into residential or commercial uses.

Just my
posted by creepycat on Oct 12, 2007 at 11:12 AM

Jeez, Bartley, I can almost see your blood pressure go up. I'm talking about a simple park. You know, stop and smell the flowers, watch a kid use a swing and get dirty in a sandpile. A meager enhancement of the quality of life. The land is not going to stay vacant. What would you have in its place?

posted by randomfactor on Oct 12, 2007 at 11:20 AM
I use parks. and neither of my kids has been on a swing in a decade.  And the presence of parks enhances my home's value.
posted by sagefever on Oct 12, 2007 at 11:25 AM
I use my neighborhood park all the time~Beale. It makes a nice walk,I take pictures of the trees,enjoy the sight of kids playing,enjoy the music in the summer and a large swath of green is good for my soul..parks make good sense.
posted by RoyTullis on Oct 12, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Even if you don't use the parks they are an asset.  If they were not there we would just have more asphalt. The green zones are better than the alternative.
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement