|
Tea Partiers rag on Kevin... Fran Florez announces endorsements -- a coincidence? Pete Parra announces endorsements Conservative group releases legislative scorecard A Republican steps into the Parra/Florez contest Jagels' retirement profiled by AP Behind the scenes of the UC Merced deal: Politico Coffeehouse brings Florez, Parras together $500 million for UC Merced: Costa and Cardoza's "ask" in health care bill Costa: "yes" vote begets UC Merced med school May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download a PDF to print on the go with the Politics, Anyone Printcast.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
GOP sends California to the back of the line
AP is reporting that a Republican Party rules committee wants to impose some order on the primary schedule for 2012. Small states would get to go first, and large states would be pushed back. Under the plan, big states would be in three rotating batches. The first batch would go in early March, the seond in late March and the third in April. The plan would have to be endorsed by the convention. Oh, and then would have to survive 50 legislatures trying to jump ahead. 3 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
randomfactor
on Apr 2, 2008 at 02:43 PM
posted by
sfinboston52
on Apr 3, 2008 at 07:39 AM
Why not all states on the same day? All 50 states hold their primary on 2nd Saturday in September and that it is whoever wins the most votes. No cacaus, no split delegates stuff, just simple who got the most votes. posted by
TomW
on Apr 6, 2008 at 07:56 PM
SF, the logic of spacing the primaries is to give low-dollar a candidates to get their message out. No primary candidate can win 50 states on the same day.
1
Advertisement |