A blog about News, Politics, and Kern County.
About politicsanyone


Member Since:
May 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
October 13, 2008
Profile Views:
1106
Blog Views:
41115
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Kern tops 300,000 voters
Will the 'economic tsunami' sweep away McCain?
Californian reporters grade the debate
Who won the debate?
VP debate: More like a NASCAR race
Advertising the candidate, not the party
Education, endorsements and geographical warfare
Candidates pouring money into TV
Jim Costa candidate questionnaire
Kern congressmen split on failed bailout bill
Archives
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


politicsanyone - > Politics, anyone? -> Marginal tax rates and the (relative) virtue of wealth
Marginal tax rates and the (relative) virtue of wealth

Grover Norquist was on the Deuce this weekend. I told my TiVo to record it (but it didn't), and then listened to Norquist's appearance on After Words last fall, where they pitted him against Jonathan Chait.

You can watch the whole thing here.

Chait, basically, argues for higher tax rates on the rich, and the whole marginal utility theory (eventually). The most interesting thing was about halfway through, after the break I think. Norquist said, basically, why do you want to punish people who work on Saturdays? And Chait said, well, that's the difference between us. You (Norquist) see wealth as the product of virtue, something attained by working hard, and therefore you believe it should not be taxes. I (Chait) see wealth as something gained differently, from knowing the right people, from being born to the right families, from being in the right place at the right time, and, often, because grandpa worked on Saturdays.

I found it interesting in light of a couple things:

• Today is tax day. Duh.

• We had the "What People Earn" this weekend, which included a hedge-fund manager whose compensation is measured in the billions of dollars. (That, to me, seems like a market breakdown. Seriously, you couldn't find someone to do the job for only $1 billion? How about $500 million? How about $100 million? Why are the investors in this hedge fund letting this guy walk off with billions of their dollars?)

• I interviewed Harvey Hall last week about his run for mayor. He described how he started his ambulance company, which involved him and his wife on duty 24 hours a day, six days a week. Like Norquist said, "working Saturdays." But now, there's more to it than just hard work. Hall Ambulance today has an exclusive franchise area, in some ways a protected status. Lots of companies are like that — if not outright monopolies then in small fields with large barriers to entry. (Of course, that doesn't guarantee a stream of money; e.g. newspapers.)

Just thought I'd throw something out there for y'all to chew on.

-- James Geluso

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: taxes, Politics, policy, c-span
posted by politicsanyone on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 42 times
2 comments from 2 users

1

posted by randomfactor on Apr 15, 2008 at 12:41 PM

The bigger question is why Norquist (who hired an illegal alien for his organization's staff, by the way) wants to penalize those people who have no choice but to work on Saturdays in order to benefit people who "earn" more on a given Saturday whether at work or not, than the first group will all year.

posted by saberhagen on Apr 16, 2008 at 07:23 AM

 

Tax people for working on Saturdays?

Absurd doesn't even begin to describe the idiocy of the grossly ill considered idea.

 

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: