|
Kern tops 300,000 voters Will the 'economic tsunami' sweep away McCain? Californian reporters grade the debate Who won the debate? VP debate: More like a NASCAR race Advertising the candidate, not the party Education, endorsements and geographical warfare Candidates pouring money into TV Jim Costa candidate questionnaire Kern congressmen split on failed bailout bill May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Ouch! Kern Co Dems flame Parra
The Kern County Democratic Party has had it with Nicole Parra. It wants her to lose staff, credentials, the works. All just because she's supporting a Republican to take over for her. Two of the letters sent by the party are attached. Feel the burn!
19 comments from 15 users
1
posted by
montfred
on Jun 19, 2008 at 07:00 PM
Ms. Easter, and her ineffective organization is an embarrassment to the Democratic party. Even their website is a joke. I wouldn't donate a nickle to them, even if that would defeat McCarthy, which of course they made no effort to do this year, heck they wouldn't even give Sharon Berry the time of day when she ran against Bill Thomas lite in '06. Go American Independent Party, I may pony up the $1,652 filing fee and run as Independent against the Cheney clone myself.
posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jun 19, 2008 at 10:19 PM
posted by
RoyTullis
on Jun 19, 2008 at 10:24 PM
posted by
gsisola
on Jun 20, 2008 at 01:18 AM
posted by
lollisalazar4
on Jun 20, 2008 at 06:28 AM
Well now...Just what did the Kern County DEANOCRATIC Central Committee expect??? posted by
witterpitters
on Jun 20, 2008 at 06:33 AM
Since when is Ms. Parra not afforded the same rights as other US citizens? Since when does another "party" member have the right to tell Ms. Parra who she will or will not endorse? Ms. Parra has every right to endorse (or not) anybody she pleases just like the rest of us!! Without repercussions to herself or any and all committees she is on! Democrat or not, she was sent to the Assembly to represent the people............ALL the people! posted by
steveeswenson
on Jun 20, 2008 at 06:40 AM
This isn't politics. This is personal. And Parra is cute so men of all political persuasions will cut her some slack. Just the way it is.
posted by
TSM
on Jun 20, 2008 at 07:04 AM
It would be nice if Parra represented all the people. Unfortunately, she tends to support farmers and agricultural interests over the rest of the people.
posted by
CheshireCat
on Jun 20, 2008 at 07:52 AM
Nicole Parra has always been for sale. She was nothing but a third-rate aide for Cal Dooley until Democrats seeking a female Hispanic candidate pushed her -- along with a great deal of her support -- to the forefront. Democrats need to evaluate a candidate for more than a heartbeat and their race. Obama is another example where the candidate's ethnicism drove the candidacy rather than competency.
posted by
tcrodriguez1
on Jun 20, 2008 at 08:01 AM
I really think that Parra, needs to stop acting like a hurt little girl and grow up! She needs to put her personal feelings aside and be objective and show some class. It just shows how immature and petty she really is, and what's scarier...was she got elected to a very important position... to represent the people of her district, not to use her notariety to bash Flores or his family, and/or avenge her father (He's a grown man, and I'm sure he can take care of himself). I really haven't heard anything derogatory about the Parra's from the Flores' camp (I'm sure the feelings are mutual, but they don't go around talking about it to the media, every chance they get)! She needs to get over it! It's just politics! posted by
Roysan
on Jun 20, 2008 at 08:24 AM
Flores should get his pretty wife to run instead of his mom! Cute Nicole can make a Conservative swoon. posted by
montfred
on Jun 20, 2008 at 08:45 AM
I agree with you TSM. Someone needs to tell Cindy et al , that Ms. Parra is about to " ...to lose staff, credentials, the works.". The voters have already sent Parra the message. posted by
TomW
on Jun 20, 2008 at 08:52 AM
Witter, Parra has every right to voice her opinion. Free speech does not imply freedom from consequences. posted by
citybeat
on Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55 AM
posted by
TomW
on Jun 20, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Lemme get this straight: the Kern County Democrats who won't back some Democrats in Kern County is now going after Parra for supporting a Republican. I get that it's a different thing, but it's not that different. posted by
citybeat
on Jun 20, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Do you mean they won't put money into some races? Parties do that for strategic and policy reasons all the time. But there's not supporting a Democrat, and there's actively working *against* a Democrat, and that's what the committee says Parra is up to. posted by
Lingtaowoo
on Jun 20, 2008 at 09:01 AM
These people in office are there to represent 'the people'--not put us in the middle of some family feud...it's no wonder that they can't head and 'rears' wired together and work together to get things done...in business, you get a raise when one produces results..not the other way around.... Two dogs fighting over a bone...that's the way I see it.....
posted by
Shwaine
on Jun 20, 2008 at 12:37 PM
This is what I dislike about partisan politics: the expectation that you will always support the party no matter what, even if you feel the candidate is poorly-suited for the position or you don't agree with the party on an issue. Regardless of the reason Parra doesn't support the Democratic candidate (I could care less about any family feud), it's her right to express her opinion. As Tom said, there may be consequences, but these consequences are purely motivated out of partisan, "us vs them" mentality and I'm frankly quite sick of that mentality when it comes to politics. Vote on the issues. Vote on the strengths of the candidates. Don't vote purely based on their party affliation (for candidates) or party endorsement (for issues). I guess this is why I registered non-partisan. posted by
CheshireCat
on Jun 20, 2008 at 04:53 PM
Hey Howeith, Kern County Supervisor positions are supposed to be "non-partisan" and therefore whether Rubio endorsed Maggard is irrelevant. California legislative positions like Nicole Parra's are political and endorsing party members does matter. You compared apples to oranges.
1
Our readers recommend: |