|
Jagels' retirement profiled by AP Behind the scenes of the UC Merced deal: Politico Coffeehouse brings Florez, Parras together $500 million for UC Merced: Costa and Cardoza's "ask" in health care bill Costa: "yes" vote begets UC Merced med school Fuller likely to run for state Senate Costa, undecided on health care, negotiating for Valley McCarthy to appear on CNN Parra vs. Florez: It's on! McCarthy draws criticism from conservative wing May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download a PDF to print on the go with the Politics, Anyone Printcast.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Danny Gilmore just saying no?
Yes, we've heard the rumors too.
The California Target Book's Allan Hoffenblum has reported in his subscription Hot Sheet e-letter that Assemblyman Danny Gilmore won't be seeking re-election.
Hoffenblum told us he heard it from two reliable sources. We have calls in to Gilmore and his staffers and hope to have it confirmed or denied by the end of the day.
Gilmore's frustration with Sacramento was made clear in a piece by (supposedly retired, ha!) Dianne Hardisty in Sunday's Californian.
If the news is true, this means even more political opportunities (and shuffling) in 2010, which is turning out to be a fun-to-watch season for political junkies.
Fran Florez, Dem, has already filed papers to run for Gilmore's seat. If he's out, who will step up from the Republican side?
-- Gretchen Wenner, staff writer
1 comments from 1 users
1
posted by
BanditIvy
on Oct 24, 2009 at 09:55 AM
Let's hope Gilmore disappears. We've already learned, like Ashburn, you can't count on him to keep his promises.
1
Advertisement |