A blog about Politics, News, and Kern County.
About politicsanyone


Member Since:
May 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
March 18, 2010
Profile Views:
2108
Blog Views:
132421
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Mettler opposes Prop. 16 at CPUC hearing
State Firefighters Endorse Pete Parra for State Assembly
Fuller switches endorsement to Whitman
Caltrans releases list of stimulus-funded transportation projects
Jim Costa still undecided on heath care
Hanford man says he will run for 30th as American Independent
Pete Parra endorsed by firefighters
Dem contender for Ashburn's seat outlines his views
Deukmejian endorses Wyman
Local Republican group accuses former treasurer of misappropriating funds
Archives
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
December 09
January 10
February 10
March 10
E-mail & Print
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download a PDF to print on the go with the Politics, Anyone Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


politicsanyone - > Politics, anyone? -> Behind the scenes of the UC Merced deal: Politico
Behind the scenes of the UC Merced deal: Politico

Politico has an in-depth look at Cardoza's (and Costa's, though he's not mentioned) deal for the possible UC Merced funding of $500 million in the health care package.

Some fun back-room details:

“It takes a lot of [chutzpah] for a guy who’s in the leadership to leverage the speaker on his own personal project and, when he got it, to continue to push,” said a senior Democratic aide.

 

Here's the McClatchy Washington bureau's take on the possibility UC Merced might not get any of the money, and a Cardoza op-ed on why he voted for the bill.

 

-- Gretchen Wenner, staff writer

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 at 10:13 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 219 times
3 comments from 3 users

1

posted by savvydude on Nov 11, 2009 at 10:38 AM

These "blue dogs", or "moderates", are nothing more than rudderless organisms looking for a deal.  We are to assume Cardoza and Costa were thinking of voting against Obamacare - except they were given $500 million taxpayer dollars to waste at the giant money pit called UC Merced.  These two cannot be trusted and should be voted out.

The Californian inferred the $500 million will have a "local" benefit.  Yeah, right.  The benefit will be just another sign on Highway 99 crowing about the "American Recovery and Renewal Act".  

posted by adampayne on Nov 11, 2009 at 12:07 PM

What's your plan, savvydude? Do you back Rep. McPartisan McCarthy and reject $100 billion per year for ten years to achieve near universal coverage, wipe out the practices of rescission and pre-existing conditions and stop bankruptcy for accidents and illness? How do you propose to solve the spirtaling costs of health care, savvydude? Open up competition across state lines for the insurance industry and allow the 5 biggest insurers to consolidate down to two in the name of efficiencies while totally deregulating the industry?  How do you control retirement costs in both the private and public sectors if each year the cost to do health business goes up 20%? How do justify spending twice as much as an individual in America for health care than do all of the individuals in the other industrialized nations currently do?

Rep. Cash-for-the-Valley Cardoza wrote a reasoned response on why he voted the way he did. Nobody seemed to mind when Bill Thomas provided a windfall to the lower San Joaquin Valley in road money, or defense money for Ridgecrest. Why the boo-hoo and outrage over the effort to get a first class medical school in the Central Valley going with grant money from the Federal government?

posted by reformer on Nov 11, 2009 at 03:49 PM

adam

If past performances by the government are your standard for a federal take over of the health system in the US, then you need to readjust your reasoning.  The past and proposed spendthrift promises of the Demos will bankrupt our nation and then we won't  have any health care at all, except perhaps a painful DRE by the local Imam.  The existing system is terrible and escalating more and more out of control, but the Demo's fix with all of the political earmarks to get the votes is a disaster.  By the way, what need is there for another gargantuan med school program in Merced?  Maybe they can fix the flu vaccine fiasco.

The 2000 page Pelosi quagmire is not the answer, and I don't think the belated ideas of the Repubs will do it either (after all, they didn't fix it when they were in control).  Our nation is in desperate straits because we really don't have a government that is operating for the overall good of the people -- only vested personal and political interests to stay in power matter.  No difference between most demos and repubs.

As for a plan, how about the elimination of the IRS as it now exists, and the institution of a flat/fair tax system?  Then the unemployed would become gov't workers, CPAs and attorneys.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement