A blog about Politics, News, and Kern County.
About politicsanyone


Member Since:
May 03, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 06, 2009
Profile Views:
1831
Blog Views:
97877
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Fuller likely to run for state Senate
Costa, undecided on health care, negotiating for Valley
McCarthy to appear on CNN
Parra vs. Florez: It's on!
McCarthy draws criticism from conservative wing
Fuller offers up Assembly-R's water bill....
Rubio might have an opponent
Pete Parra: Why he might - and might not - run
Protect Marriage: Ban Divorce
Danny Gilmore just saying no?
Archives
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
E-mail & Print
Get e-mail updates from this blog, and download a PDF to print on the go with the Politics, Anyone Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


SACRAMENTO -- Bakersfield's Republican state senator, Roy Ashburn, has begun raising money for a possible race for a powerful state tax board in 2010, when he will be facing unemployment under the current term limits law.

But he said his decision to run for a seat on the Board of Equalization may be affected by pending proposals to change legislative term limits, one of which was written by Ashburn himself. If one of the changes gets on the ballot and is approved by voters, Ashburn would have the option of running for a third four-year term in the Senate.

Ashburn has made no formal announcement about the tax board race. His plans came to light when a Sacramento political newsletter reported he had a fundraising event scheduled Wednesday evening for a committee formed for the board campaign.

Asked to explain, Ashburn said under the current law, he cannot continue to raise money for a Senate campaign after he is elected to his final term. That's why many termed-out legislators have formed committees to run for statewide offices or, like Ashburn, for the Board of Equalization.

They may or may not end up running for those offices, but Ashburn said he was definitely interested in the five-member board. It is made up of the state controller and four members elected from districts that each represent 25 percent of the state's population.

"I think it's an exciting position in state government," Ashburn said. "This is California's tax board. It exists for taxpayer fairness, and the tax disputes that come before the board have a huge impact on the taxpayers of our state."

Ashburn is a former Kern County supervisor and Assemblyman who was first elected to the Senate in 2002 and re-elected last year.

He would be a candidate for the 2nd District Board of Equalization seat now held by Republican Bill Leonard from Redlands. The sprawling 32-county district covers most of the heavily Republican inland area of the state. It includes Kern County and all of Ashburn's huge 18th Senate District, which runs from Bakersfield east to the Nevada border.

A number of other state senators have been mentioned for the seat. The best known is Tom McClintock, the ultra-conservative Republican from Thousand Oaks who came in third in the recall election race for governor won by Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2003. He has also run for state controller and lieutenant governor.

Leonard and Ashburn are close friends. Leonard hired Ashburn's former wife, Diane, for his staff in 2003, several months before the senator filed for divorce. Diane Ashburn no longer works for the board, Leonard said.

About Roy Ashburn, Leonard said, "He's a friend and I think he'd make a great Board of Equalization member. I also think it will be a very competitive Republican primary for this seat in 2010."

The state Board of Equalization administers and collects more than 30 taxes, including the sales tax, tobacco tax, fuel taxes and timber yield taxes. It does not administer the personal income tax. That is collected by the Franchise Tax Board. The Board of Equalization is the appeals body for taxpayers who disagree with their bills for the taxes it administers, as well as personal income tax disputes.

--Vic Pollard

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 09:26 AM
Permalink - Comments [2] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 114 times

In one more sign that Kern County politicians know which side their bread is buttered on, Nicole Parra was the only Democrat in the Assembly to vote against the big gun control bill of the year. It was a measure to require that firing pins and other parts of semiautomatic handguns carry tiny numbers that wold transfer to shell casings when the gun is fired. Gun control advocates and some prominent police officials said it would help identify guns used in murders and trace them to their last legal owner. Critics said it would do no good because criminals wouldn't use a weapon with "microstamping" as it's called.

The bill passed the Assembly 44-29 Monday with most Democrats voting yes and most Republicans voting no. A few from both parties abstained.

Not Nicole. But why did she vote no? Even though everyone knows valley voters don't like the government messing with their guns, she wouldn't say. Her chief of staff, Derek Chernow, said she was too busy to respond to rquests for comment.

--Vic Pollard

 

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 at 01:58 PM
Permalink - Comments [5] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 116 times

At the recent state Democratic Party convention in San Diego, one of the top conversation topics was a young woman with a press credential, trailed by a TV cameraman, who identified herself as Citizen Kate. Turns out she’s some kind of cross between a You Tube hottie and an enterprising free-lance reporter.  At every chance, she explained she knows nothing about politics, but she wants to learn by covering the presidential campaign. She puts her videos up on a web site, http://citizenkate.tv/, and here’s part of what she says about herself.:

Citizen Kate here. You know, I never knew that politics
was as fun and satisfying as buying Manolo Blahniks
at a seventy percent off sale and eating pancakes right
afterward, but it is! You don't need to be a pundit to cover politics.
You just need to look cute and ask questions and have a
camera to record stuff. If you're like me, and you've never
been politically active, then together we're gonna find out
about the presidential candidates and all this politics stuff. 
Whew, it's a lot of work.

Here’s what Screen Magazine found out about her:

Sometimes, in order to get something done right, you have to leave it up to the unprofessionals. Kate Soglin is Citizen Kate, and she’s taking the virtual world by storm with her “Citizen Kate” political blog and YouTube webisode series. Claiming to know more about fashion than politics, Soglin is hot on the 2008 campaign trail and is reporting her discoveries back to her fellow laypeople, in laypeople’s terms.

Soglin’s work as Citizen Kate is a collaboration with producer/director Carey Lundin of Viva Lundin Productions, producer/director Chris Peppey and editor Steve Swanson – all Chicagoans. Coming from different professional backgrounds, Soglin and Lundin met through mutual friends and began brainstorming on the idea of a political project.

“I’m not anybody [who] knows anything about politics at all,” explains Soglin. “I’ve worked with the environment in the past and [I’ve] volunteered, but I really am clueless when it comes to politics, for the most part.” Enter Barack Obama, whom Soglin credits with igniting her interest in politics. “I have a huge love for Barack Obama,” she says. “He’s from Chicago and he is very charismatic and cute. I think everyone gets very emotional when he speaks.”

--Vic Pollard

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Thursday, May 24, 2007 at 08:35 AM
Permalink - Comments [27] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 196 times
It took him a while, but Bakersfield’s Republican congressman, Kevin McCarthy, announced today he would vote “no” on the proposed immigration bill if it came before him in its present form.
“I’ve got a real concern with how it treats the 12 million people who are here illegally,” McCarthy said by phone from Washington. “I don’t support the concept that somehow illegal actions allow people to jump in front of the line.”
As proposed, the measure would allow many illegal immigrants to apply for legal residency by paying a fine and fees and get to a path toward possible citizenship.
McCarthy said he delayed taking a position because the Senate negotiators have not produced a text of the bill. "And the devil is in the details," he said
McCarthy also stressed that the proposal being debated by the Senate is unlikely to come up in the House for weeks and may be changed dramatically before it does.
As it stands, the issue puts McCarthy, between a political rock and hard place.
Agriculture, the biggest industry in his two-county district, supports the proposal strongly because it includes a guest worker program they have been seeking for years as a solution to labor shortages.
But conservative Republicans – and many not-so-conservative ones – object to the legalization provisions for illegals.
 ---Vic Pollard
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 at 01:52 PM
Permalink - Comments [13] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 107 times
With a little help from the Senate’s leader, Don Perata of Oakland, Sen. Dean Florez today outmaneuvered cell phone industry lobbyists who – he says – were confident they could defeat his bill to require the companies to “unlock” phones so they can be used with other carriers.
To understand this item, try to picture dozens of lobbyists standing around in a Capitol hallway at the rear entrance to the Senate chamber. They’re barred by law from entering the chamber while a session is in progress. So when they want to ask a Senator to vote for or against a bill, they ask sergeants-at-arms to take their business cards to the lawmaker on the floor, and hope he or she comes out and listens.
Here’s an e-mail from Florez’ BlackBerry on what happened today.
"Despite the entire cell phone industry working in the hall to kill the bill...they lost. They were taking bets it died on floor as they were to "pull dems" (Democrats) off the floor, but Perata let me jump order and we were first vote up…that gave them a total of 1 minute after session started...so we got out without their pressure! Hooray for consumers...they can win in these halls on some days, especially as powerful as the cell phone industry is.  Seems they (the cell providers) were ‘locked out’ instead of consumers."
 
Dean
 
The bill passed the Senate on a bare-majority vote. As it moves to the Assembly, the opponents are not likely to make the same mistake twice.
--Vic Pollard
 
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 03:56 PM
Permalink - Comments [4] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 93 times

Here’s AP’s latest story on the flap that developed Saturday over ex-pres Jimmy Carter’s evaluation of the current administration.

What do you think?

ATLANTA (AP) - Former President Jimmy Carter said Monday his remarks were "careless or misinterpreted" when he said the Bush administration has been the "worst in history" for its impact around the world.

Speaking on NBC's "Today," Carter appeared to retreat from a statement he made to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for a Saturday story in which he said: "I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history."

Carter said Monday that when he made the comment, he was responding to a question comparing the Bush administration's foreign policy to that of Richard Nixon.

"And I think Richard Nixon had a very good and productive foreign policy and my remarks were maybe careless or misinterpreted. But I wasn't comparing the overall administration, and I was certainly not talking personally about any president," Carter said.

"I think this administration's foreign policy compared to president Nixon's was much worse," he said, but he said he did not mean to call it the worst in history.

Deputy White House press secretary Tony Fratto, with Bush at the president's ranch in Crawford, Texas, said Monday, "I think it just highlights the importance of being careful in choosing your words. I'll just leave it at that."

 

 

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 03:14 PM
Permalink - Comments [19] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 70 times
By VIC POLLARD
Californian Sacramento Bureau
In a rare moment of agreement, farmers and union leaders in Kern County cheered Thursday’s agreement on an immigration bill, saying it will ease labor shortages in the valley and provide a path to legalization for many thousands of illegal immigrants if it’s passed.
The county’s Democratic congressman, Jim Costa  of Fresno, joined the cheering section, but its Republican, Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield, said he was not ready to commit himself one way or another.
What they said:
AGRICULTURE:
Matthew Park, manager of the Kern County Farm Bureau, said the bill will be a major boon to local farmers.
“It’s very meaningful and it’s a step in the right direction, because here in Kern County we rely so heavily on our workers that come from south of the border,” Park said.
Manuel Cunha, head of a group that represents hundreds of valley farmers on labor and other issues, said the bill contains the major features of an agricultural labor program known as AgJOBS that the industry and the United Farm Workers Union have been trying to get passed for seven years.
It allows undocumented workers who can prove that they work regularly in the fields to apply for temporary legal residency. And in the future, farmers who can prove that they have a labor shortage can apply to import guest workers.
As president of the Fresno-based Nisei Farmers League,  Cunha was directly involved in negotiations on the bill.
He said Thursday’s agreement “Shows that our Senators and our representatives in the valley understand the importance of getting this immigration bill passed this year and making sure AgJOBS is part of it.”
LABOR:
“This is a huge step forward,” said Armando Elenes, organizing director for the United Farm Workers union. “It’s something that is deeply needed for farm workers and we’re glad that a bipartisan group, Democratic and Republican Senators, feel that farm workers deserve the right to apply for citizenship.”
UFW officials were also heavily involved in the negotiations on the bill.
CONGRESSMEN:
“I think it’s long overdue that we correct the problems and inequities associated with the de facto immigration policies that have existed for over 20  years,” said Costa. By that, he said he meant such things as looking the other way about illegal immigration and exploitation of immigrants by coyotes and unscrupulous employers.
“One thing is for sure,” he added, “If we do nothing, the existing problems will continue.”
McCarthy said he had not read the agreement and could not comment immediately.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 05:47 PM
Permalink - Comments [30] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 160 times
Did you notice that just two of the 11 members of the San Joaquin Valley air board voted against the controversial plan last month to delay the valley’s pollution cleanup deadline by more than a decade, to 2024?
Turns out there’s quite a story behind that vote. It involves some hardball local politics with state Sen. Dean Florez in the middle of it.
The dissenters were the two newest appointees to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District board, Arvin City Council member Raji Brar and Fresno Councilman Henry Perea.
Brar and Perea were appointed to the air board in February by the valley’s regional branch of the League of California Cities, made up of local council members and mayors. It should have been a routine matter because local cities get a certain number of appointments to the board.
What made it unusual is that the general membership of the regional group overrode a recommendation by the group’s executive committee for appointment of two other people.
This came in the wake of some heavy lobbying on behalf of Brar and Perea by Florez and his staff.
Florez said he supported the two because he felt they were likely to vote against the deadline extension. He has repeatedly criticized the air board for what he says is going too easy on polluters, exposing valley residents needlessly to unhealthy air.
The executive committee didn’t take kindly to Florez’s interference. It charged that Florez and his aides bullied the council members with thinly veiled threats to oppose them in their next re-election campaigns and give their issues short shrift in Sacramento if they didn’t vote for his candidates.
“This was a city appointment and for a State Senator to be involved by calling cities and speaking on behalf of a candidate was extremely inappropriate,” the executive committee said in an April 11 letter to Florez. The executive committee is headed by Wasco Councilwoman Cheryl Wegman.
Florez denied making any threats and insisted he was acting within his rights as both a citizen and a public official to express his opinion about appointments to such an important board.
“I sincerely find your letter offensive to the democratic process and the rights of free expression, especially – and ironically – coming from an organization made up of elected officials,” Florez wrote.
Stay tuned. We haven’t heard the last of this fight.
 
--Vic Pollard
 
 
 
 
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 14, 2007 at 12:04 PM
Permalink - Comments [3] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 88 times
(With apologies to The Police [the rock group of yore])

I was sickened driving through McFarland's east-of-the-freeway streets yesterday for a follow-up on the latest gang violence.

Blatant gang graffiti dominated certain areas, especially along San Lucas, where three have been killed so far this year in a two-block stretch.

Our paper's coverage thus far has focused on the mostly black street gangs in east Bakersfield. But the recent rash of shootings in McFarland has us wondering: What on earth is going on up there? We've heard even our carriers are afraid to drive the streets.

I've learned enough to know 13 stands for the massive Surenos, or southerners, Hispanic gang based in Southern California. The Sureno/Norteno rivalry supposedly stretches from Mexico to Canada.

"13" stands for the 13th letter of the alphabet, M, which reportedly refers to the Mexican Mafia. The Nortenos use 14, for N.

Delano was at one time, and perhaps still is, the de facto dividing line between the northern and southern gangs, although our recent discussions with law enforcement don't seem to reinforce this as a current driver of conflict.

Regardless, something very scary is going on in McFarland and it was chilling to see the clear allegiance to the Surenos scrawled large on streets where young kids were out playing. Even one fence along a large church had been copiously tagged.

I'm attaching a few more pics that didn't make it into the paper or on the Web. The 13 is obvious. "Sur" is shorthand for Surenos. "Myfas," according to sheriff's Sgt. Steve Hansen, is the name for McFarland's unit of the Surenos. Hansen, who led the gang unit until recently, couldn't remember exactly what Myfa meant...possibly something about "my McFarland," he said.

I wondered: What can we do as a community?

I confess: This ultra-saturated enclave made me want to send in armed guards. As in total military lockdown.

Can anything less extreme work?

-- Gretchen Wenner, staff writer
Posted in these Groups:
Topics: gangs, Politics, McFarland
posted by politicsanyone on Sunday, May 13, 2007 at 11:52 AM
Permalink - Comments [12] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 488 times
State Sen. Dean Florez emerged today as the first lawmaker to criticize Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s plan to lease the California Lottery to a private company.
As soon as he read about the plan this morning, Florez whipped out a legal opinion on the issue that he requested from the Legislative Counsel’s office three months ago.
The opinion, which does not have the force of law, concludes that California voters approved a lottery to be operated by the state and it would take another vote by them to privatize it.
“I am very concerned that the governor is floating a proposal on which he clearly has not done his homework,” Florez said in a press release.
Florez chairs the state senate committee that oversees lottery issues. This is not his first clash with the administration over what he says is its efforts to expand gambling in the state. Last year Florez went to the mat and lost a battle to stop the lottery from joining the multi-state Mega Millions lottery.
In a conference call with reporters, administration officials explained that they’re disappointed in the $1.1 billion-a-year proceeds from the lottery and think a professional, private operator could boost the revenue considerably.
Adam Mendelsohn, the governor’s communications director, said the governor’s people believe they do not need a nother vote of the people, that they can lease out the lottery under the doctrine of implied legal authority to make changes as long as the changes advance the purpose of the lottery law. That requires a law enacted with a two-thirds vote of the Legislature.
And Mendelsohn, no fan of Florez, jumped at the opportunity to say the Kern County lawmaker doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
“We look forward to working with Sen. Florez to help him understand the proposal,” Mendelsohn said with obvious sarcasm.
--Vic Pollard
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Thursday, May 10, 2007 at 03:46 PM
Permalink - Comments [2] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 67 times

"It's Dean Florez being an opportunist like he always is."

--Kern High School District board member Chad Vegas on state Sen. Dean Florez's bill to require all school trustees to take two hours of ethics training every two years. Florez said it was inspired by a Californian survey showing many local school board members do not report any outside income. In the survey, Vegas was one who did not report any income, although he may not have been required to under district rules.

Vic Pollard

 

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Thursday, May 10, 2007 at 09:20 AM
Permalink - Comments [12] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 72 times
I'm at the break in the city council meeting, where vice-man Hanson apparently helped himself to extra donuts? Check this out:

• The county invited the city to appoint TWO city councies to the new transportation funding task force;

• Hanson gets to choose;

• At tonight's early session, Hanson announced he'd chosen THREE city councies, including himself (also Scriv and Weir).

This is developing so maybe it's not as not-playing-well-with-others as it initially seems. It's not immediately clear if the county's invitation specified two city-heads or perhaps if he got a behind-the-scenes OK earlier.

Benham voted no, saying if the city has three the county will have to have three which will make a quorum of supervisors. Couch (who wanted on bad but was not surprisingly snubbed) said nothing but voted no.

No one at the meeting clarified the format of the county's invitation or whether it specifically invited two councilmembers.

Remember: INVITED!!

Hanson said he was sure the county wouldn't mind...

This will be updated later when I track down the invitation; apparently it was written down somewhere...

Comments? Rudeness??

-- Gretchen Wenner




Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Wednesday, May 9, 2007 at 06:02 PM
Permalink - Comments [7] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 110 times
 I'd like to know what thinkest the herd about upcoming appointments by the City Council on Wednesday (May 9):

Planning Commission
Three choices for two spots:
1. William Andrews, retired government worker, mostly social work in Compton and L.A.; field rep for Nicole Parra. Experience includes legislative analysis and housing/community development for CDB grants.
2. Marvin Dean, local builder and contractor, active in southeast Bakersfield redevelopment, publisher of Kern Minority Contractors Association.
3. Andy Stanley, field rep for Kevin McCarthy. Formerly safety technician/office manager at Ken Small Construction Inc. (now KS Industries, his resume says) and BJ Services Inc.

The planning comm spots are open in Carson's and Scrivner's wards after term expirations of John Spencer (longtime  planner) and Barbara Lomas (smart-as-a-whip rep for Ashburn). Neither reapplied; Lomas knew it would be a waste of time for her to bother. I'm not sure about Spencer's decision.

Big issues ultimately go to the City Council anyway.

Still, what do you think of the possible mix here? Another Thomas/McCarthy/Abernathy thread likely pulling the levers? Does it matter?

Fire Civil Service Commission:
1. Thomas Edmonds, retired Beverly Hills police detective
2. Joseph Hanson, a lawyer who represented the city fire department during the recent Pratt/Gentry fiasco
3. Lowell Manzer, a retired man whose application provides absolutely no info other than that. Well, he attended Bako High and Bako College and is "interested in fire department rules."

Does this commission matter other than the possible drama of more public disciplinary hearings?

Transportation task force
Two slots; Hanson will appoint; Couch wants on bad; will he be denied? Will Scrivner/Weir get it, a situation Couch pointed out would require special notification of every meeting due to a quorum of the city planning and development committee?
 

On an unrelated note, I saw a badger this weekend while driving back on remote Highway 58. I didn't know they were out here.

Thoughts? Feelings? (About commission appointments, not exclusively badgers)

-- Gretchen Wenner, staff writer




Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Politics
posted by politicsanyone on Tuesday, May 8, 2007 at 10:34 AM
Permalink - Comments [1] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 195 times
Dennis Tope of Tehachapi fired at state Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter, in a letter Tope sent to The Californian this week. You won't see Tope's letter printed in The Californian's letter to the editor section because it contained some factual errors. Among those errors was the contention that Florez had introduced an "unimaginable" number of bills awaiting passage in the Legislature.

Actually, the 33 bills Florez has introduced (not the 35 Tope contended he introduced) is well under the maximum Florez and every state senator is allowed to introduce. That number is 50. And, according to Florez's office, 13 of the Senate's  40 members have each introduced 30 or more bills this session.

Now that may be hard to imagine. But, like it or not, Florez's 33 bills is not "unimaginable."

But it seems Tope really has a hard time imagining the content of Florez's bills.

"Does California really need some school board ethics bill or horseracing bills that he is sponsoring?" Tope asked. "Florez doesn't need much encouragement to cook up bills. Someone gets killed at a railroad crossing and out cranks a bill for more gates. A bunch of kids are overweight and our cranks a bill for more P.E. in school. Florez is bill happy and he's out to strictly impress the 681,000 voters he represents.

"Florez needs to keep his 'loaded gun of bills in its holster' before firing out another bunch of mundane bills,'" Tope wrote.

While Florez may be swimming upstream with his P.E. bill, families who have had people killed at deadly train intersection might not consider his train gate bill mundane. And after a Californian informal survey revealed the haphazard compliance with anti-political corruption laws by area school board members, an ethics course would seem to be in order.

What's "unimaginable" in one person's eyes is certainly "imaginable" in others.

Posted by Dianne Hardisty, editorial page editor
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 05:29 PM
Permalink - Comments [3] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 57 times
Looks like former Kern County Supervisor Barbara Patrick has taken a new job — she'll be working on special projects for  the Great Valley Center.

She's now listed on the groups "About Us" sectiion of the web site at
http://www.greatvalley.org/...

The Great Valley Center is a non-profit dedicated to improving the Central Valley of California.

Here's Patrick's bio from the organization's site:

Barbara Patrick
Special Projects Coordinator

Barbara Patrick joined the Great Valley Center staff in April, 2007, as Special Projects Coordinator.  Barbara is well-versed in San Joaquin Valley issues.  She recently retired from the Kern County Board of Supervisors, serving 12 years in that capacity.  Barbara served as Kern County’s representative to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and as the San Joaquin Valley’s representative to the California Air Resources Board (CARB).  She was a member of the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley for 2 years, serving as a liaison between CARB and the Partnership.

As Kern County Supervisor, Barbara was a representative to many committees, including:  San Joaquin Valley Regional Association of California Counties Executive Committee, Kern County Employees Retirement Association, Local Agency Formation Commission, Kern Medical Center Joint Conference Committee, Museum Authority Board and Kern Economic Development Corporation.

Barbara will be working on special projects at the Center including assisting in
GVC’s role as consultant to the California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley.

Barbara was a teacher for the Bakersfield City School District prior to her election to the Board of Supervisors in November, 1994.  She is a graduate of the University of California at Santa Barbara.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 05:05 PM
Permalink - Comments [0] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 33 times

From time to time, you've probably seen metal plaques memorializing historic sites of one kind or another, signed by the sponsoring organization, E Clampus Vitus. Last week, a column of mine described the group as "a raucous, irreverent drinking society that occasionally commemorates historical sites in the West. When they’re sober enough." It drew the following reply from a Bakersfield man who said as a member,  he was terribly offended . Now,  everything I've read about E Clampus Vitus, not to mention a few encounters,  does not give it reputation as an organization with a lot  of  "responsible and sober-minded members." But he deserves to be heard. If you know any "clampers," as its members are called, what do you think? Does he have a legitimate complaint or is he putting us on?

This was written 30 years ago in your paper. By Walter E. Stewart   " Society's merits weren't emphasized" E Clampus Vitus, the oldest historical society in the western states, was inaccurately portrayed in a recent Californian article. It took the ludicrous side of the society and blew it out of proportion. Serious and worthy aspects were hardly mentioned. t The article wrongfully presented E Clampus Vitus as a bunch of decadent drunks. The responsible and sober-minded members may not be amused by such labeling for nothing could be further from the truth.E Clampus Vitus, which has been subjected to adverse publicity for years, is a serious historical society, rich in tradition, founded on truth and dedicated to the preservation of western heritage. The oder has never flaunted its achievements or sought publicity. The archives are rich with history. There would be more tolerance and less impulsive and wrongful condemnations if we would all make an endeavor to be well-versed on a subect before we contibute to the damage of innocent people's reputations by flaunting erroneous assumptions.
John Hagelstein
 ECV 1866  
Posted by Vic Pollard
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 02:35 PM
Permalink - Comments [5] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 118 times

Here, verbatim, is an article about Thomas's new role from the Capitol Hill newspaper, Roll Call:

Posted by Vic Pollard 

By Kate Ackley
Roll Call Staff
May 3, 2007
Add one more name to the list of former Members who join the K Street ranks but pledge not to lobby. Former Rep. Bill Thomas (R-Calif.), who chaired the House Ways and Means Committee from 2001 until retiring in January, is setting up shop at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney. But Thomas, who sources say will earn a base salary of around $600,000, doesn’t plan to wear out his shoes lobbying his one-time colleagues.
Thomas, who over 28 years earned a reputation as a prickly — though intellectual — partisan GOPer, said he will help the firm’s clients on big-picture advice.
“I’ll be able to work with Members and look at the bigger picture and the narrower picture, but I will not be lobbying,” insisted Thomas, who added that many of his interactions with Members will be through his current role as a visiting fellow with the American Enterprise Institute. “I have some younger Members I helped get in, and they’re growing.”
Thomas said the Buchanan Ingersoll job is part-time and that he will move between California and Washington, D.C. He said he plans to sell his house in Washington, live out of an apartment here and buy a bigger house in California.
At Buchanan Ingersoll, he will keep tabs on such issues as health care, trade promotion authority and reform of entitlement programs for Social Security and Medicare.
Thomas’ longtime committee counsel, Robert Winters; Alex Brill, a former Ways and Means senior adviser; and Thomas’ scheduler, Renee Edelen, have all joined the firm as well.
Democrat Ron Platt, who heads Buchanan’s lobby practice, said he first met Thomas and Winters in the mid-1980s while representing a client in Thomas’ Congressional district, which is just north of Los Angeles. Strange as it sounds, Platt said, the two hit it off.
“We shared an interest, which both of us have outgrown by now, in Porsches,” Platt said.
Platt said that even though Thomas is barred from lobbying Congress for one year and isn’t likely to lobby after his ban is over, Thomas can immediately provide advice for Buchanan clients like TMO Recyclables LTD, a London company that is working on cellulosic ethanol technology.
“Whether you agreed with him or not, Bill always had a grasp of where health policy or tax policy was going,” Platt said. “He can say to clients, ‘Here are things you might want to start doing now’ to position themselves for where he sees things going in the next five years.”
Platt said he is looking forward to working with Thomas, who will bring “intellectual firepower,” and the other members of Thomas’ team.
“He has a reputation for being somewhat difficult to get along with, and there are certainly people on the Hill who don’t like him,” Platt said. “Regardless of that, we spent a lot of time over the last month since we started talking and exploring that very issue — ‘Can we work together?’ — both from his end and mine, and I think we both came to the conclusion that we can.”
For his part, Thomas said that in addition to the Buchanan and AEI gigs, he is looking to serve on a corporate board. “Not a big one, but one where I might have an ability to influence in a positive way,” he said. “I’m curious about Sarbanes-Oxley and how companies deal with it. ... I’m ignorant. By serving on a board, I could help the corporation and learn more about the way the corporate world deals with Sarbanes-Oxley.”
Thomas also isn’t ruling out the option of doing some consulting independent of Buchanan Ingersoll, and he said he is busy with AEI plans that include a Hill event on Tuesday focusing on health care policy — an example of the often blurry lines between direct lobbying and policy discussions.
“If I were a lobbyist, and suggesting particular pieces of legislation, I believe my credibility would be significantly damaged,” Thomas said of his AEI events. “I would much rather maintain my reputation and integrity than to make some money lobbying.”
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 10:57 AM
Permalink - Comments [9] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 81 times
Ok. Grass roots political action alert here.

The city and county are starting a year long process to revise the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.

I can't say it loud enough — If you have EVER complained about ANYTHING in Bakersfield, now's the time to get off your butt and get involved in changing the place you live. The General Plan controls everything from how fast we grow to where growth happens and how much it impacts our everyday life.

There are four public meetings being held this month. The meetings are being run by Vision 2020 and help planners know what things they should focus on when they start studying the situation.

Go to a meeting:

Tonight (May 7) : Northeast Bakersfield, Richard Prado East Bakersfield Senior Center, 2101 Ridge Road
Tuesday: Northwest Bakersfield, Greenacres Community Center, senior room, 2014 Calloway Drive
May 21: Southeast Bakersfield, Martin Luther King Community Center, 1000 S. Owens St.
May 31: Southwest Bakersfield, Bakersfield Firefighters Association Hall, 7400 Wible Road
If you can’t make these meetings, go to www.bakersfieldvision2020
.com to express your ideas.
For more information, call Lorelei Oviatt, 862-8866, or Jim Eggert, 326-3754.


James Burger
Californian staff writer
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Permalink - Comments [1] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 39 times
When I analyzed Kern County federal political donations last week, I found no one had given a dime to Hillary. (At least not any Kern dimes that had been reported yet to the FEC.)

After the list ran in the paper May 1st, I got a voice message from a gentleman whose name sounded like Roy Hughes, or something similar.

"I just want to let you know there has been a contribution to Hillary Clinton's campaign," Mr. Hughes-or-something said. "After reading the article I mailed off a check to her. So I was letting you know that it's been updated, and she has a contribution from Kern County. Thank you, bye."

So there you have it. She's in like Flynn in Kern with at least one fellow who has polite phone manners and a pleasing drawl.

And like Mr. Hughes-or-something, I was letting y'all know it's been updated.

Posted by Gretchen Wenner, Californian staff writer



Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Politics, presidential race
posted by politicsanyone on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 07:26 PM
Permalink - Comments [3] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 83 times
Just heard our own Inga Barks will play pundit on Fox News Saturday afternoon, if you want to take a gander.

The KERN 1410 talk show host will weigh in on pit bulls, says KERN program director and news anchor Blake Taylor. Apparently Massachusetts legislators may consider legislation banning pit bulls or requiring that owners get training or a dangerous dog license.

"Inga is pro-pit bull," Taylor says.

She's to be on Fox News' Big Story Weekend with Julie Banderas at 2 p.m. Saturday. Previously she's been on the channel's Hannity & Colmes show discussing Dylan's Law.

Written by Christine Bedell

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 05:03 PM
Permalink - Comments [34] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 196 times

If you're new to Bakersfield, you may have no idea how bizarre our politics are.

If you've been here a while, you've probably sensed that they're way different from any other place in California - maybe even the country.

Your first clue should have been the defiant "Alamo/Tombstone" message and the fake missile that until recently adorned the top of the old Padre Hotel downtown. It was the legacy of a fierce battle during the 1960s and 1970s between the city council and the hotel's former owner, Milton "Spartacus" Miller, one of the most stubborn men that ever lived.

Bakersfield is still the political equivalent of the Wild West.

In local partisan politics, this is a time of transition away from more than two decades in which just-retired GOP Congressman Bill Thomas called most of the shots.

We now basically have four major political parties, instead of two.

There's the dominant local Republican Party establishment, founded by Thomas and now led by Congressman Kevin McCarthy and political consultant Mark Abernathy. Then there's the smaller conservative wing, headed by State Sen. Roy Ashburn. It is constantly battling attempts by the GOP insiders to freeze it out of power and influence.

The local Democratic Party is a battleground between two families: Florez and Parra.
It's our version of the Hatfields and McCoys, without the guns.

State Sen. Dean Florez harbors a long-running feud with Assemblywoman Nicole Parra and her dad, Pete.

Nonpartisan city and county politics are no different.

The agribusiness and oil interests that once governed Kern County with an easy-going, laissez faire outlook have faded in influence. Rising in their place is a rapidly growing urban population increasingly concerned about the quality of life here-air and water pollution and other health issues, what's happening in schools, urban sprawl, drug use, gang violence.

Politics has a bad smell to many people. Not that it doesn't deserve some of it, but politics is still the glue that holds society together while people who disagree with each other work out solutions to the problems we all face.

This blog will be devoted to bringing you the inside stories as those issues work themselves out in local, state and federal politics in the coming election year and beyond, with contributions from all Californian reporters.

We welcome your comments, but please respect the opinions of others. And if you want respect for your opinions, please have the courage to sign your real name.
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by politicsanyone on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 02:16 PM
Permalink - Comments [9] - Leave a Comment - Report a Violation
Viewed 90 times